Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Introduction to Critical Race Theory in Educational Research Praxis, Study notes of Social Sciences

Critical Race Theory is a revolutionary and intellectual movement that puts race at the centre of critical analysis.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

stagist
stagist 🇺🇸

4.1

(27)

265 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Introduction to Critical Race Theory in Educational Research Praxis and more Study notes Social Sciences in PDF only on Docsity!

Introduction to Critical Race Theory in Educational Research and Praxis DARIA ROITHMAYR Critical race theory (CRT) is an exciting, revolutionary intellectual move- ment that puts race at the center of critical analysis. Although no set of doctrines or methodologies defines critical race theory, scholars who write within the parameters of this intellectual movement share two very broad commitments. First, as a critical intervention into traditional civil rights scholarship, critical race theory describes the relationship between ostensibly race-neutral ideals, like “the rule of law,” “merit,” and “equal protection,” and the structure of white supremacy and racism. Second, as a race-conscious and quasi-modernist intervention into critical legal scholarship, critical race theory proposes ways to use “the vexed bond between law and racial power” (Crenshaw, Gotanda, Peller, and Thomas, 1995, p. xiii) to transform that social structure and to advance the politi- cal commitment of racial emancipation. Critical race theory inherits much from critical legal scholarship and conventional legal principles generated during the civil rights movement, but it also represents a significant departure from these two movements. Like most of critical legal scholarship, critical race theory manifests a deep dissatisfaction with liberal legal ideology generally, and with contempo- rary civil rights thinking about race and racism in particular. When criti- cal race theory emerged in the late 1980s, national conversations about race and racism were still very much tied to a conventional liberal modei of law and society. Under this model, liberal political commitments fo- cused on the universalism, objectivism, and race-neutrality of concepts like “equal opportunity,” “merit,” and “equal protection.” Racism was understood to be a deviation from these race-neutral norms: To be racist was to irrationally assume on the basis of an irrelevant characteristic like skin color that people of color did not possess the universal characteristics of reason or merit. Law was supposed to eradicate these instances of race- 1