Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

International Political Economy - Short Paper I | PLSC 356, Papers of Political Science

Material Type: Paper; Class: INTERNATNAL POLITICAL ECONOMY; Subject: Political Science; University: University of Richmond; Term: Summer 2008;

Typology: Papers

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/18/2009

koofers-user-lfi
koofers-user-lfi 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
PLSC 356
Short Paper 1: due 2/7/2008
Write a succinct essay (about 250 words) to answer the following question. Please
consult the syllabus and the handout “How to Write a Good Paper in Political Science”
for details and expectations. You must pledge your work.
Which of the three major theoretical paradigms of International Political Economy –
mercantilism, liberalism, and Marxism – is most compelling to you? Why?
[Note: Your paper should not just describe or summarize the main points of these three schools,
but to analyze them, state clearly your position, and support it with evidence (sound reasoning
and / or empirical facts).]

Partial preview of the text

Download International Political Economy - Short Paper I | PLSC 356 and more Papers Political Science in PDF only on Docsity!

PLSC 356

Short Paper 1: due 2/7/

Write a succinct essay (about 250 words) to answer the following question. Please consult the syllabus and the handout “How to Write a Good Paper in Political Science” for details and expectations. You must pledge your work.

Which of the three major theoretical paradigms of International Political Economy – mercantilism, liberalism, and Marxism – is most compelling to you? Why? [Note: Your paper should not just describe or summarize the main points of these three schools, but to analyze them, state clearly your position, and support it with evidence (sound reasoning and / or empirical facts).]