Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Internal Customer Satisfaction Survey – 2013, Study notes of Finance

Our seven internal-facing Departments (DGS, DTS, Finance, OCA, OHR, OMB, & ... The initial 2007 survey consisted of 12 questions designed to ...

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

freddye
freddye 🇺🇸

4.3

(11)

235 documents

1 / 92

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
CountyStat
Montgomery County:
Internal Customer Satisfaction Survey 2013
January 8, 2014
CountyStat Office
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a
pf3b
pf3c
pf3d
pf3e
pf3f
pf40
pf41
pf42
pf43
pf44
pf45
pf46
pf47
pf48
pf49
pf4a
pf4b
pf4c
pf4d
pf4e
pf4f
pf50
pf51
pf52
pf53
pf54
pf55
pf56
pf57
pf58
pf59
pf5a
pf5b
pf5c

Partial preview of the text

Download Internal Customer Satisfaction Survey – 2013 and more Study notes Finance in PDF only on Docsity!

CountyStat

Montgomery County:

Internal Customer Satisfaction Survey – 2013

January 8, 2014

CountyStat Office

CountyStat

CountyStat Principles

 Require Data Driven Performance

 Promote Strategic Governance

 Increase Government Transparency

 Foster a Culture of Accountability

2013 Internal Customer 2 01/08/

CountyStat

Meeting Goal

 Deliver CountyStat analysis of results of the 2013 Internal Customer

Satisfaction Survey, and identify trends in order to help departments better

serve their internal customers

2013 Internal Customer 4 01/08/

Desired Outcome

 Ensure quality service to County’s internal customers and identify

targeted areas for improvements

CountyStat

Agenda

 Welcome and Introductions

 Meeting Goals

 Follow-up Items from 2012 Survey

 Survey Methodology & Survey Questions

 Summary of Findings & Survey Response Rates

 Overview of Scores

 Quantitative Data Analysis by Question

– Quality of Service; Level of Effort; Success Rate; Communication;

Professional Knowledge; Availability; Responsiveness; Initiative;

Process; Guidance & Assistance; Timeliness; Information; Innovation

 Quantitative & Qualitative Analysis & Discussion by Department

– County Attorney; Finance; Management and Budget; Public

Information; Technology Services; Human Resources; General

Services

 Wrap up

2013 Internal Customer 5 01/08/

CountyStat

Status of 2012 Internal Survey Follow-Up Items (2/2)

Department / Action Item Status

OHR / Conduct quarterly briefings to address workforce issues to improve service delivery Complete

OHR / Implement communications with internal and external customers to attract, recruit, retain, and develop a well-qualified diverse workforce

Complete/ Ongoing

OHR / Develop a cadre of division staff capable of accessing and using the County Oracle systems Ongoing

DTS / Undertake a more inclusive enterprise technology strategic planning process which will hopefully give DTS more insight into departments' systems and support needs Complete

DTS / Undertake a more inclusive enterprise technology strategic planning process which will hopefully allow DTS to better align its services to support the departments In Process

DTS / Strengthen customer feedback channels by conducting a mid-year customer survey Complete

DTS / Document, publish, and publicize Service Request service levels In Process

OCA / Having division chiefs meet with their counterparts to get a more ground level view of how the process is working Incomplete

2013 Internal Customer 7 01/08/

CountyStat

Agenda

 Welcome and Introductions

 Meeting Goals

 Follow-up Items from 2012 Survey

 Survey Methodology & Survey Questions

 Summary of Findings & Survey Response Rates

 Overview of Scores

 Quantitative Data Analysis by Question

– Quality of Service; Level of Effort; Success Rate; Communication;

Professional Knowledge; Availability; Responsiveness; Initiative;

Process; Guidance & Assistance; Timeliness; Information; Innovation

 Quantitative & Qualitative Analysis & Discussion by Department

– County Attorney; Finance; Management and Budget; Public

Information; Technology Services; Human Resources; General

Services

 Wrap up

2013 Internal Customer 8 01/08/

CountyStat

Internal Survey Questions

  1. Quality of Service: Rate your satisfaction with the overall quality of service received by the following Departments.
  2. Level of Effort: Rate the level of effort your Department must invest to successfully utilize the Department's service(s).
  3. Success Rate: Rate how often the following Departments successfully meet the needs and requirements of your Department.
  4. Communication: Rate how often Department staff were able to explain and answer questions to your satisfaction.
  5. Professional Knowledge: Rate how often you were satisfied with the professional knowledge exhibited by the Department staff.
  6. Availability: Rate how often your first attempt to reach Department staff was successful.
  7. Responsiveness: Rate how often you were satisfied with the responsiveness of the Department staff.
  8. Initiative: Rate how often you were satisfied with the amount of initiative taken by Department staff in addressing your needs and requirements.
  9. Process: Rate your overall satisfaction with the process(es) the Department uses to address your needs or requirements.
  10. Guidance & Assistance: Rate your satisfaction with the guidance and assistance provided for the process(es).
  11. Timeliness: Rate your satisfaction with the timeliness of the process(es) to satisfy your needs and requirements.
  12. Information: Rate your satisfaction with the amount of information provided to you about the status of your request.
  13. Innovation: Rate your satisfaction with the Department’s ability to innovate in order to satisfy your needs.

Overall

ratings

Personnel

ratings

Process

ratings

2013 Internal Customer 10 01/08/

CountyStat

Agenda

 Welcome and Introductions

 Meeting Goals

 Follow-up Items from 2012 Survey

 Survey Methodology & Survey Questions

 Summary of Findings & Survey Response Rates

 Overview of Scores

 Quantitative Data Analysis by Question

– Quality of Service; Level of Effort; Success Rate; Communication;

Professional Knowledge; Availability; Responsiveness; Initiative;

Process; Guidance & Assistance; Timeliness; Information; Innovation

 Quantitative & Qualitative Analysis & Discussion by Department

– County Attorney; Finance; Management and Budget; Public

Information; Technology Services; Human Resources; General

Services

 Wrap up

2013 Internal Customer 11 01/08/

CountyStat

Survey Response Rates

2013 Internal Customer 13 01/08/

Department Percent

*OEMHS 150.0% DHCA 100.0% MCERP (BIT) 100.0% OCA 100.0% OCP 100.0% OHR 100.0% REC 100.0% DGS 84.0% FIN 84.0% MCPL 80.0% CUPF 75.0% DLC 71.4% MCPD 71.4% DPS 68.8% IGR 66.7% DEP 62.5% OMB 60.0% PIO 60.0% DTS 58.3% CEC 57.1% DOT 53.5% CEX 53.3% DOCR 52.9% BOE 50.0% HHS 50.0% HRC 50.0% MCFRS 40.9% DED 28.6% CCL 25.0%

  • Surveys were sent to two OEMHS Managers. Three survey respondents identified OEMHS as their home Department/Office. Therefore, the survey may have been forwarded to a third recipient.

26 out of the 29 Departments/

Offices had at least 50% of

survey recipients respond to

the survey.

CountyStat

Agenda

 Welcome and Introductions

 Meeting Goals

 Follow-up Items from 2012 Survey

 Survey Methodology & Survey Questions

 Summary of Findings & Survey Response Rates

 Overview of Scores

 Quantitative Data Analysis by Question

– Quality of Service; Level of Effort; Success Rate; Communication;

Professional Knowledge; Availability; Responsiveness; Initiative;

Process; Guidance & Assistance; Timeliness; Information; Innovation

 Quantitative & Qualitative Analysis & Discussion by Department with

Departments’ self -ratings removed

– County Attorney; Finance; Management and Budget; Public

Information; Technology Services; Human Resources; General

Services

 Wrap up

2013 Internal Customer 14 01/08/

CountyStat

All Scores (1/2):

2013 Survey County

Attorney Finance

DGS-Bldg Services

DGS-Capital^ Dev Needs DGS

-Fleet Services

DGS

-Leased Space

Needs

DGS-Print/Mail/

Archives

DGS- Procurement Human Resources-

Benefits

Human Resources-

Records Management

Q2: Quality of service 3.47 3.27 2.71 2.79 3.13 3.05 3.22 2.76 3.06 3.

Q3: Level of effort 3.18 2.98 2.50 2.47 3.00 2.93 3.19 2.31 3.02 3.

Q4: Success rate 3.31 3.12 2.49 2.56 2.98 2.84 3.16 2.66 2.99 3.

Q5: Communication 3.35 3.19 2.56 2.72 3.05 2.97 3.16 2.76 2.97 3.

Q6: Professional knowledge 3.47 3.29 2.75 2.88 3.14 3.02 3.20 2.87 3.03 3.

Q7: Availability 3.17 3.01 2.50 2.86 3.07 2.92 2.97 2.69 2.69 2.

Q8: Responsiveness 3.35 3.18 2.45 2.72 3.00 2.86 3.07 2.68 2.92 3.

Q9: Initiative 3.19 2.98 2.35 2.67 2.91 2.72 2.91 2.53 2.83 3.

Q10: Process 3.44 3.20 2.56 2.81 3.09 2.98 3.18 2.73 3.04 3.

Q11: Guidance & Assistance 3.43 3.22 2.64 2.82 3.09 2.98 3.18 2.76 3.06 3.

Q12: Timeliness 3.33 3.16 2.59 2.78 3.05 2.93 3.10 2.61 3.08 3.

Q13: Information 3.30 3.18 2.60 2.80 3.09 2.99 3.05 2.81 3.05 3.

Q14: Innovation 3.09 2.98 2.48 2.67 2.92 2.83 3.01 2.55 2.98 3.

Overall Average Rating 3.31 3.14 2.55 2.74 3.04 2.93 3.11 2.67 2.98 3.

2013 Internal Customer 16 01/08/

Department showed statistically significant increase from 2012

Department showed statistically significant decline from 2012

CountyStat

All Scores (2/2):

2013 Survey

Human Resources

EEO & Diversity Human Resources-

Labor/Employee

Relations

Human Resources-

Occupational Medical Services Human Resources

Recruitment &

Selection

Human Resources-

Classification &^ Compensation Human Resources

Change Management &Organizational^ Development Management &

Budget^ Public Information TechnologyServices^ Average

Rating

Q2: Quality of service 3.11 3.06 3.11 3.03 2.87 3.00 2.93 3.19 3.17 3.

Q3: Level of effort 3.24 3.00 3.11 2.81 2.68 2.99 2.65 3.27 2.98 2.

Q4: Success rate 3.03 2.95 3.03 2.96 2.78 2.93 2.81 3.12 3.02 2.

Q5: Communication 3.01 2.96 3.09 3.02 2.84 3.02 2.91 3.20 3.11 3.

Q6: Professional

knowledge

Q7: Availability 2.91 2.87 2.88 2.85 2.81 2.90 2.98 3.12 3.16 2.

Q8: Responsiveness 2.97 2.99 3.04 2.99 2.81 2.99 2.96 3.16 3.12 2.

Q9: Initiative 2.94 2.83 2.92 2.88 2.72 2.92 2.77 3.08 3.07 2.

Q10: Process 3.06 2.95 3.09 2.99 2.83 3.03 2.91 3.20 3.13 3.

Q11: Guidance &

Assistance

Q12: Timeliness 3.03 3.01 3.03 2.91 2.83 3.03 2.92 3.14 3.15 2.

Q13: Information 3.07 3.06 3.01 2.99 2.84 3.04 2.96 3.17 3.16 3.

Q14: Innovation 2.94 2.87 2.90 2.80 2.70 2.95 2.76 3.06 3.08 2.

Overall Average Rating 3.04 2.97 3.03 2.95 2.81 2.99 2.89 3.16 3.12 2.

2013 Internal Customer 17 01/08/

Department showed statistically significant increase from 2012

Department showed statistically significant decline from 2012

CountyStat

County-wide Overall

County Attorney

Finance

DGS-Bldg Services

DGS-Capital Dev Needs

DGS-Fleet Services

DGS-Leased Space Needs

DGS-Print/Mail/Archives

DGS-Procurement

Management & Budget

Public Information

Technology Services

Quantitative Data Analysis: Quality of Service (1/2)

3.07*

*2009 baseline overall average

Very dissatisfied (1.0)

Dissatisfied (2.0)

Satisfied (3.0)

Very satisfied (4.0)

2013 Internal Customer 19 01/08/

Rate your satisfaction with the overall quality of service received by the following Departments.

County-wide Overall Avg.

2010 3.

2011 2.

2012 3.

2013 3.

CountyStat

County-wide Overall

Human Resources (2010-2012)

**HR-Benefits

**HR-Records Management

**HR-EEO & Diversity

**HR-Labor/Employee Relations

**HR-Occupational Medical Services

**HR-Recruitment & Selection

**HR-Classification & Compensation

**HR-Change Mgmt & Org Dev

Quantitative Data Analysis: Quality of Service (2/2)

3.07*

*2009 baseline overall average

Very dissatisfied (1.0)

Dissatisfied (2.0)

Satisfied (3.0)

Very satisfied (4.0)

2013 Internal Customer 20 01/08/

Rate your satisfaction with the overall quality of service received by the following Departments.

County-wide Overall Avg.

2010 3.

2011 2.

2012 3.

2013 3.