Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Hypothesis, Laws and Theory, Study notes of Philosophy of Law

Define the hypothesis, theory and laws and also describe theory vs law which is better.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

birkinshaw
birkinshaw 🇺🇸

4.7

(9)

239 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Hypothesis, Theory, or Law?
Posted By: Joshua Filmeron: August 31, 2013In: Science
Print Email
Background image credit: NASA
What is the difference between a scientific hypothesis, theory, and law?
When reading scientific articles (and many of the articles on From Quarks to Quasars), you will see the terms hypothesis,
theory, and law used to describe something. In the scientific community these words have very specific definitions. For
laypeople, sometimes these definitions get confusing because many time these words are used differently in a colloquial
context.
So, what does it mean when you call something a hypothesis, a theory, or a law?
Hypothesis:
A hypothesis is a reasonable guess based on what you know or observe. Hypotheses (plural of hypothesis) are proven and
disproven all of the time. Hypotheses play a strong role in the scientific method where you formulate a question, create a
hypothesis, make a testable prediction, test, and then analyze the data. Even then, a hypothesis needs to be tested and retested
many times before it is generally accepted in the scientific community as being true.
Example: You observe that, upon waking up each morning, your trashcan is overturned with trash spread around the yard. You
form a hypothesis that raccoons are responsible. Through testing, the results will either support or refute your hypothesis.
Theory:
A scientific theory consists of one or more hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. Theories are one of the
pinnacles of science and are widely accepted in the scientific community as being true. To remain a theory, it must never be
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Hypothesis, Laws and Theory and more Study notes Philosophy of Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Hypothesis, Theory, or Law?

Posted By: Joshua Filmeron: August 31, 2013In: Science Print Email

Background image credit: NASA

What is the difference between a scientific hypothesis, theory, and law?

When reading scientific articles (and many of the articles on From Quarks to Quasars), you will see the terms hypothesis, theory, and law used to describe something. In the scientific community these words have very specific definitions. For laypeople, sometimes these definitions get confusing because many time these words are used differently in a colloquial context.

So, what does it mean when you call something a hypothesis, a theory, or a law?

Hypothesis:

A hypothesis is a reasonable guess based on what you know or observe. Hypotheses (plural of hypothesis) are proven and disproven all of the time. Hypotheses play a strong role in the scientific method where you formulate a question, create a hypothesis, make a testable prediction, test, and then analyze the data. Even then, a hypothesis needs to be tested and retested many times before it is generally accepted in the scientific community as being true.

Example: You observe that, upon waking up each morning, your trashcan is overturned with trash spread around the yard. You form a hypothesis that raccoons are responsible. Through testing, the results will either support or refute your hypothesis.

Theory:

A scientific theory consists of one or more hypotheses that have been supported with repeated testing. Theories are one of the pinnacles of science and are widely accepted in the scientific community as being true. To remain a theory, it must never be

shown to be wrong; if it is, the theory is disproven (this also happens). Theories can also evolve. This means the old theory wasn’t wrong, but it wasn’t complete either. Here are some examples.

Creating a more complete theory – Newtonian physics and General relativity

When Sir Isaac Newton discovered the theory of gravity and wrote laws that explained the motions of objects, he was not wrong; but he wasn’t fully right either. Einstein later discovered the theories of special and general relativity and this creates a more complete theory of gravity. In fact, when you stay far below the speed of light, many of the equations in general and special relativity give you Newton’s equations. NASA, for the record, uses Newton’s equations when planning missions for their spacecraft.

Overturning a theory – Steady State vs Big Bang

What happens when you have two theories that contradict each other, as is the case with the Steady State and Big Bang theories? For a very brief summery on these theories. the Steady State theory says the universe is Steady and doesn’t change whereas the Big Bang theory says the universe started at some point in time in a ‘big bang’.

In this case, scientists make observations, hypothesis and testable predictions to figure out which one is right (Example: I observe the universe is expanding, I hypothesize there was a beginning, I test by doing the math). Eventually, either one theory is overturned completely (as is the case with Steady State vs Big Bang) or the correct aspects of each theory are combined to form a new theory.

In either case, the theories then need to withstand the rigors of testing and retesting. After a theory proves itself overtime, it is accepted into the scientific community as being correct. In many cases, these theories are the groundwork on which other theories are built on. An example is general/special relativity, these theories lay the foundation for many, many other theories and equations (such as Hubble’s law and the Schwarzschild radius). If relativity were ever overturned, that would be very bad (but, also good because it means science advanced).Note: In cases like relativity, since the math always works out, the likelihood of that happening is very, very small. Rather, relativity will probably be proven a smaller piece in a lager more complete theory scientists hypothesize about called Grand Unification – but that is a post for another time.