1) 1) iPhone are better than androids.
2) 9 out of 10 users
3) no, I think that the groups being interviewed need to be chosen from a wider basis.
Not chosen from a bias group.
2) 1) Toyota lasts longer than other brands.
2) experts research shows
3) yes, I think that if experts have done research and no other group disputes then it very
well could be legitimate. The life time of a vehicle is a measurable thing.
3) 1) New girl, peoples favorite show on TV.
2) “peoples” show preference
3) No, I assume that the group was bias towards the show. If a neutral group was
chosen, then it could be proven.
4) 1) Asics, top of the line.
2) running experts
3) No, they could have very well used experts to prove the quality of the shoes, but they
lack specification.
5) 1) Carmex, the number one dermatologist recommended Chapstick
2) dermatologists
3) Yes, they chose a legitimate source to represent the quality of their brand.