
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The views of philosophers plato, aristotle, hobbes, locke, kant, and rousseau on democracy and its alternatives. Topics include the meaning of democracy, its evolution, and the criticisms of philosophers towards it. The document also discusses the differences between direct and representative democracy, and the ideal government according to each philosopher.
Typology: Schemes and Mind Maps
1 / 1
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Intro = meaning of democracy, how it changed in history. Democracy does not coincide with republic. (example of plato's symposium). Direct vs Representative
J Plato = criticism of democracy = philosopher rules
A Aristotle = In democracy, rule is by and for the needy. In contrast, rule of law or aristocracy (literally, power [rule] of the best) or even monarchy, where the ruler has the interest of his country at heart, are better types of government. Government, Aristotle says, should be by those people with enough time on their hands to pursue virtue
J Hobbes = he describes democracy as the least stable and most partial form of government. The first in order of time and the last in order of safety, Hobbes criticizes democracy for being prone to discord and -in his words- as easily seduced by Orators as water drawn upon a plain Table is guided by a finger.
Hobbes believed that humans were basically selfish creatures who would do anything to better their position. Left to themselves, he thought, people would act on their evil impulses. According to Hobbes, people therefore should not be trusted to make decisions on their own The best government was one that had the great power of a leviathan. Hobbes believed in the rule of a king because he felt a country needed an authority figure to provide direction and leadership. Because the people were only interested in promoting their own self-interests, Hobbes believed democracy would never work.
A Locke
J Kant = (1795) opposed direct democracy since it is "necessarily despotism, as it establishes an executive power contrary to the general will; all being able to decide against one whose opinion may differ, the will of all is therefore not that of all: which is contradictory and opposite to liberty." Instead, Kant favors a constitutional republic where individual liberty is protected from the will of the majority.
A Rousseau = general will is public interest vs will of all (sum of particular wills). People when voting, vote for particular will. Rousseaus's democracy = direct democracy. Rousseau roughly distinguishes three forms of government. When all or most of the citizens are magistrates, the government is a democracy. When fewer than half the citizens are magistrates, the government is an aristocracy. When there is only one magistrate (or in some cases a small handful of magistrates), the government is a monarchy. There is not one form of government that is best for all. Rather, as Rousseau has already noted, the larger the population, the fewer magistrates there should be. Thus, large states are well suited to monarchy, small states to democracy, and intermediate states to aristocracy. When the government and the sovereign are the same body, there is a great danger that the combining of legislative and executive functions will corrupt the laws and lead to the ruin of the state. A successful democracy would need to be small, with simple and honest citizens who have little ambition or greed