














Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Guidelines for establishing pharmacist peer review committees in Texas, as mandated by the Texas Pharmacy Act in 1999. Peer review committees are designed to suggest improvements in pharmacy systems, assess system failures, and make recommendations for continuous quality improvement. the basic steps to implement peer review, including conducting periodic self-audits, setting quality standards, and providing appropriate feedback mechanisms.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 22
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
1. Selecting Members for the Pharmacy Peer Review Committee The composition of the committee is the responsibility of the entity which establishes the committee. The committee should include individuals familiar with pharmacy practice, continuous quality improvement, causes and prevention of adverse quality- related events, and the work environment. At a minimum, a peer review committee should consist of two or more people and be predominantly composed of peer pharmacists. Other members may include pharmacist-interns, pharmacy technicians, nurses, physicians, other health-care professionals, attorneys, consumers, and/or other personnel necessary for the proper functioning of the committee. Supervisors may participate in the committee but not for the purpose of performance evaluations. 2. Setting Quality Standards and Indicators One of the initial duties of a pharmacy peer review committee is to establish standards for quality against which pharmacy services will be evaluated to determine whether pharmacy services are improving or declining. Once a standard has been established, indicators should be identified to measure whether the standard is being met. As with any quality improvement process, standards and indicators will continually evolve. 3. Developing Reporting Procedures and Forms The pharmacy peer review committee should develop reporting procedures and forms for: - an ongoing assessment of the pharmacy’s activities against the quality standards; and - an assessment of adverse quality-related events.
Procedures and forms should be designed to provide the information necessary for the next step in the process, an evaluation against the standard. For an ongoing assessment, the data collected should permit an evaluation of quality performance over time.
For an adverse quality-related event, the data collected should permit an evaluation of how the system failed. To be effective, adverse quality-related events must first be detected and documented, then reported to the peer review committee. Procedures should be established concerning how to report an adverse quality-related event and to whom the initial report must be given. Information concerning the event should be documented as soon as possible after discovery of the adverse event, while recall is still fresh.
4. Evaluating Activities Against the Standard Information gathered during an ongoing assessment should be evaluated to determine whether the quality of pharmacy services is improving or declining. For an adverse quality-related event, the committee should direct an investigation and complete a root cause analysis to identify the basic or causal factors for the event.
The pharmacy peer review committee may decide not to review all assessment or incident reports, but rather, may wish to establish priorities and review only reports relating to those priorities. When determining priorities, the committee needs to consider activities that:
If a pharmacy peer review committee takes action that could result in censure, license suspension, restriction, limitation, or revocation by the board or denial of membership or privileges in a health-care entity, the affected pharmacist shall be provided a written copy of the recommendation of the pharmacy peer review committee and a copy of the committee’s final decision, including a statement of the basis for the decision.
A complete, written record of the pharmacy peer review committee’s review should be maintained by the committee for a minimum of two years. To maintain the confidentiality of peer review records, they must be kept separately from patient or drug order records.
6. Conducting Periodic Self-Audits Peer review is a part of the facility’s continuous quality improvement program. An essential component of any continuous quality improvement program is to periodically evaluate how well peer review is working to improve quality. Questions should be asked, such as: - Are the quality standards being met? - Are the quality standards adequate? - Do the results, over time, show an improvement in quality for the pharmacy?
The self-audit provides feedback for the entire peer review system. These audits should be conducted at least annually, the results evaluated, and appropriate adjustments made to the standards or process. Changes will inevitably be made to improve the system and provide a way to measure quality performance.
(2) a failure to identify and take appropriate action concerning: (a) over-utilization or under-utilization; (b) therapeutic duplication; (c) drug-disease contraindications; (d) drug-drug or food-drug interactions; (e) incorrect drug dosage or duration of drug treatment; (f) drug-allergy interactions; (g) clinical abuse/misuse; and/or (B) failure to provide counseling or providing inadequate or incorrect counseling to a patient or patient’s agent; and/or (C) providing inadequate or incorrect information to health-care professionals involved in a patient’s care. Continuous quality improvement - an ongoing process which improves the standards and procedures used to identify and evaluate quality-related events and to improve patient care. Indicator - an objective, measurable activity used to monitor and evaluate whether a process is performed within a set standard. Outcome-based - considers the result of the performance (or non-performance) of a function or process(es). Pharmacy peer review committee - (A) a pharmacy peer review, judicial, or grievance committee of a pharmacy society or association that is authorized to evaluate the quality of pharmacy services or the competence of pharmacists and suggest improvements in pharmacy systems to enhance patient care; or (B) a pharmacy peer review committee established by the owner of a pharmacy or an employer of pharmacists that is authorized to evaluate the quality of pharmacy services or the competence of pharmacists and suggest improvements in pharmacy systems to enhance patient care. Pharmacy peer review process - part of an ongoing, outcome-based, continuous quality improvement process which goes beyond traditional personnel evaluations, risk management activities, or supervisory reviews of a pharmacy process and involves: (A) the setting and periodic re-evaluation of standards for quality by which a pharmacy operation will be evaluated; (B) the collection of data necessary to identify when those standards are not being met and data necessary to evaluate the reason(s) the deficiency occurred; (C) an objective review of the data by an appropriate peer review committee to make recommendations for quality improvement; and (D) an appropriate feedback mechanism to ensure that the process is operating in a manner which continually improves the quality of care provided to patients. Quality standard - an expected level of performance measured by specific criteria or
indicators established by the pharmacy peer review committee. Peer - an individual who is of equal standing with another. Root cause analysis - A process of identifying the basic or causal factors that underlie the occurrence or possible occurrence of an adverse quality-related event. A root cause analysis focuses primarily on systems and processes, not individual performance.
Illustrations for Basic Steps - Suggestions
Peer review is one part of a continuous quality improvement program. Different practice settings will have different programs. The following charts list some of the considerations for each of the basic steps in the peer review process. This is not intended to be a complete discussion of the details of a peer review process. Any peer review process must be tailored to the individual practice setting. However, the following six steps are basic to the process and contain suggestions or examples to start the development process for a peer review program. Remember, to protect the confidentiality of peer review records, they must be kept separate from patient or drug order records.
Composition Two or more people.
Predominantly peers of the those involved in the provision of pharmacy services.
To the extent possible, should be predominantly composed of people familiar with: (1) Pharmacy practice; (2) Continuous quality improvement; (3) Work environment; and (4) Causes and prevention of adverse quality-related events.
Examples of potential members
Non-Employee Members of the Committee
Obtain signed statement that they will maintain the confidentiality of the Peer Review Committee.
Develop procedures for reporting the indicators established
Need to determine:
Adverse Quality-Related Events
Develop reporting forms
For the ongoing assessments.
For adverse quality-related events.
Documentation Documentation of an adverse quality-related event should be made as soon as possible after discovery, while recall of the event is fresh.
Community Pharmacy Example
Example of initial documentation for a dispensing error
Reporting form may contain:
Hospital Pharmacy Example
Determine what to review
Set priorities for what the peer review committee will review.
When establishing priorities, the committee needs to consider activities that:
Discussions Should be candid and non-punitive.
Intended to determine where quality performance failed.
Evaluation of data Ongoing Assessments
Adverse quality-related events
Review and documentation of ongoing assessments and adverse quality- related events
A written record should be made which contains at least:
Reporting of recommendations
Determine the appropriate entity within the organization with the authority to evaluate and implement the recommendations.
Protection of the Public If the committee identifies an individual who can no longer practice safely, the peer review committee should recommend to management, or other appropriate entity, that the individual be reported to the appropriate regulatory authority.
Records A complete, written record of the pharmacy peer review committee’s review should be maintained by the committee for a minimum of two years.
To maintain the confidentiality of peer review records, they must be kept separate from patient or drug order records.
Notification If a pharmacy peer review committee takes action that could result in censure, license suspension, restriction, limitation, or revocation by the board or denial of membership or privileges in a health-care entity, the affected pharmacist shall be provided a written copy of the recommendation of the pharmacy peer review committee and a copy of the committee’s final decision, including a statement of the basis for the decision.
Conducted At least annually or more frequently as determined by the committee.
Periodically evaluate how well peer review is working to improve quality
Questions like the following should be asked:
Adjustments to the peer review process
Changes should be identified and made to any portion of the peer review process which does not facilitate improvement in quality performance.
Resources As entities develop a peer review process as part of a continuous quality improvement program, they may need to access resources on these topics. Appendix B contains a partial list of resources.
confidentiality provisions provided by this section. If a pharmacy peer review committee takes action that could result in censure, license suspension, restriction, limitation, or revocation by the board or denial of membership or privileges in a health care entity, the affected pharmacist shall be provided a written copy of the recommendation of the pharmacy peer review committee and a copy of the pharmacy peer review committee’s final decision, including a statement of the basis for the decision. (f) Unless disclosure is required or authorized by law, records or determinations of or communications to a pharmacy peer review committee are not subject to subpoena or discovery and are not admissible as evidence in any civil judicial or administrative proceeding without waiver of the privilege of confidentiality executed in writing by the committee. The evidentiary privilege created by this section may be invoked by any person or organization in any civil judicial or administrative proceeding unless the person or organization has secured a waiver of the privilege executed in writing by the chairman, vice chairman, or secretary of the affected pharmacy peer review committee. If a pharmacy peer review committee, a person participating in peer review, or any organization named as a defendant in any civil action filed as a result of participation in peer review may use otherwise confidential information in the committee’s, person’s, or organization’s own defense or in a claim or suit under Subsection (i) of this section, a plaintiff in such proceeding may disclose records or determinations of or communications to a peer review committee in rebuttal to information supplied by the defendant. Any person seeking access to privileged information must plead and prove waiver of the privilege. A member, employee, or agent of a pharmacy peer review committee who provides access to otherwise privileged communications or records in cooperation with law enforcement authorities in criminal investigations is not considered to have waived any privilege established under this section. (g) All persons, including governing bodies and medical staffs of health care entities, shall comply fully with a subpoena for documents or information issued by the board as otherwise authorized by law. The disclosure of documents or information under such subpoena does not constitute a waiver of the privilege associated with pharmacy peer review committee proceedings. Failure to comply with such subpoena constitutes grounds for disciplinary action against the facility or individual by the appropriate licensing board. (h) A cause of action does not accrue against the members, agents, or employees of a pharmacy peer review committee from any act, statement, determination, or recommendation made or act reported, without malice, in the course of peer review according to this section. (i) A pharmacy peer review committee, a person participating in peer review, or a health care entity named as a defendant in any civil action filed as a result of participation in peer review may use otherwise confidential information obtained for legitimate internal business and professional purposes, including use in the committee’s, person’s, or entity’s own defense. Such use does not constitute a waiver of the confidential and privileged nature of pharmacy peer review committee proceedings. (j) Reports, information, or records received and maintained by the board pursuant to this section are considered investigative files and are confidential and may only be released as specified in Section 17(q) of this Act.
Institute of Medicine 2101 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20418 www.nationalacademies.org
Useful Publication The IOM Report - To Err is Human - Building a Safer Health System
Institute for Safe Medication Practices 1800 Byberry Rd., Suite 810 Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006 215/947- www.ismp.org
Useful Publications Medication Errors , edited by Michael R. Cohen, M.S., R.Ph. Medication Safety Self Assessment
National Patient Safety Foundation 515 North State Street Chicago, IL 60610 312/464- www.npsf.org
Pharmacy Quality Council c/o Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy 100 N. Pitt Street, Suite 400 Alexandria, VA 22314 703/683- www.amcp.org
Participating Organizations Academy of Managed Care Pharmacies American College of Apothecaries American College of Clinical Pharmacy American Pharmaceutical Association American Society of Consultant Pharmacists American Society of Health-System Pharmacists National Association of Chain Drug Stores National Community Pharmacists Association Pharmaceutical Care Management Association
Useful Publication Summary of National Pharmacy Quality Measures , February 1999
Texas Pharmacy Association P.O. Box 14709 Austin, TX 78761 512/836- www.txpharmacy.com
Texas Society of Health-System Pharmacists 1224 Centre West, Suite 200B Springfield, IL 62704 800/242- www.tshp.org
Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations One Renaissance Boulevard Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181 630/792- www.jcaho.org
National Committee for Quality Assurance 2000 L Street NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20036 202/955- www.ncqa.org
American Accreditation Healthcare Commission (Formerly the Utilization Review Accreditation Commission) 1275 K Street NW, # Washington, DC 20005 202/216- www.urac.org
Foundation for Accountability 202 SW Sixth Ave., Suite 700 Portland, OR 97204 503/223- www.facct.org
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research 2101 E. Jefferson Street, Suite 501 Rockville, MD 20852 301/594- www.ahcpr.gov
Health Care Financing Administration 7500 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21244 410/786- www.hcfa.gov
Texas State Board of Pharmacy 333 Guadalupe Street Box 21 Austin, TX 78701- 512/305- www.tsbp.state.tx.us