Docsity
Log inSign up
Docsity
Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity

Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan

Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips
Sell on Docsity
Sell on Docsity
Log inSign up

Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity

Find documents

Prepare for your exams with the study notes shared by other students like you on Docsity

Search Store documents

The best documents sold by students who completed their studies

Search through all study resources
Docsity AINEW

Summarize your documents, ask them questions, convert them into quizzes and concept maps

Explore questions

Clear up your doubts by reading the answers to questions asked by your fellow students

Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan

Share documents
download point icon20 Points

For each uploaded document

Answer questions
download point icon5 Points

For each given answer (max 1 per day)

All the ways to get free points
Get points immediately

Choose a premium plan with all the points you need

Study Opportunities

Choose your next study program

Get in touch with the best universities in the world. Search through thousands of universities and official partners

Community

Ask the community

Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts

University Rankings

Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users

Free resources

Our save-the-student-ebooks!

Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors

From our blog

Exams and Study
Go to the blog

Good Faith in Development Agreements: Implied and Express Duties, Study notes of Civil Law

Arts University Bournemouth (AUB)Civil Law

The concept of good faith in development agreements through various case studies and identifies the general principles that apply. English contract law does not recognize a general doctrine of good faith, but it may be implied in certain categories of contracts, such as development agreements, which are considered 'relational contracts'. the implications of good faith in development agreements, the limits of the duty to act in good faith, and the consequences of breaching this duty.

What you will learn

  • How is the duty of good faith determined in the context of a development agreement?
  • What is the role of good faith in development agreements?
  • What are the implications of breaching the duty of good faith in a development agreement?

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

juno
juno 🇬🇧

4.8

(10)

317 documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
Good Faith Clauses in Development
Agreements
Jonathan Upton
Introduction
1. In recent years it has become increasingly common for parties to a
development agreement to agree to act towards one another with “good
faith”. The meaning and extent of the obligations on the contracting
parties imposed by such clauses is often difficult to ascertain. The
purpose of this paper is to consider a number of cases in which good faith
clauses, implied and express, are discussed and identify the general
principles that apply to development agreements.
Good faith in English contract law
2. The courts have repeatedly held that there is no general doctrine of “good
faith” in English contract law. In Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto
Visual Programmes Ltd [1989] 1 QB 433 at 439 Bingham LJ said:
“In many civil law systems, and perhaps in most legal systems
outside the common law world, the law of obligations recognises and
enforces an overriding principle that in making and carrying out
contracts parties should act in good faith. This does not simply mean
that they should not deceive each other, a principle which any legal
system must recognise; its effect is perhaps most aptly conveyed by
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8

Partial preview of the text

Download Good Faith in Development Agreements: Implied and Express Duties and more Study notes Civil Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Good Faith Clauses in Development

Agreements

Jonathan Upton

Introduction

  1. In recent years it has become increasingly common for parties to a development agreement to agree to act towards one another with “good faith”. The meaning and extent of the obligations on the contracting parties imposed by such clauses is often difficult to ascertain. The purpose of this paper is to consider a number of cases in which good faith clauses, implied and express, are discussed and identify the general principles that apply to development agreements.

Good faith in English contract law

  1. The courts have repeatedly held that there is no general doctrine of “good faith” in English contract law. In Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd [1989] 1 QB 433 at 439 Bingham LJ said: “In many civil law systems, and perhaps in most legal systems outside the common law world, the law of obligations recognises and enforces an overriding principle that in making and carrying out contracts parties should act in good faith. This does not simply mean that they should not deceive each other, a principle which any legal system must recognise; its effect is perhaps most aptly conveyed by

such metaphorical colloquialisms as “playing fair”, “coming clean” or “putting one’s cards face upwards on the table”. It is in essence a principle of fair open dealing … English law has, characteristically, committed itself to no such overriding principle but has developed piecemeal solutions in response to demonstrated problems of unfairness.”

  1. Three main reasons have been given for the hostility towards a doctrine of good faith. First, the preferred method of English law is to proceed incrementally by fashioning particular solutions in response to particular problems rather than by enforcing broad overarching principles. Second, English law is said to embody an ethos of individualism, whereby the parties are free to pursue their own self-interest not only in negotiating but also in performing contracts provided they do not act in breach of a term of the contract. Third, the fear that recognising a general requirement of good faith in the performance of contracts would create too much uncertainty: there is concern that the content of the obligation would be vague and subjective and that its adoption would undermine the objective of contractual certainty to which English law has always attached great weight.

What does “good faith” mean?

  1. In Manifest Shipping Co Ltd v Uni-Polaris Insurance Co Ltd [2001] UKHL 1, [2003] 1 AC 469 insurers alleged that shipowners had failed to observe “utmost good faith” (as required by s. 17 of the Marine Insurance Act
    1. in the presentation of a claim. The Commercial Court judge, the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords all rejected that defence. Their Lordships held that in the particular context the duty of utmost good faith required no more than that the insured should act honestly and not in bad faith.

return for a fee payable in certain circumstances. The contract contained an express term that: “[i]n all matters relating to this Agreement the parties will act with the utmost good faith towards one another and will act reasonably and prudently at all times.”

  1. Although the developer made efforts to promote the owners’ land (including towards obtaining a planning consent of considerable value), the owners wished to sell the land in question to a third party for a very large sum. The developer, which argued that the would-be sale price reflected the significant improvement in its planning prospects, applied for an injunction to prevent the owners from selling or otherwise disposing of the land. Morgan J held at [97] that, as a matter of construction, the express term imposed on the owners. “… a contractual obligation to observe reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing in accordance with their actions which related to the Agreement and also [required] faithfulness to the agreed common purpose and consistency with the justified expectations of the [developer].”
  2. In the circumstances, Morgan J considered that the intended sale would amount to breach of the owners’ obligation of good faith on the grounds that: the developer had invested considerable time and incurred expense as a result of which the value of the land had been significantly enhanced; on the terms of the contract, the owner was not obliged to pay a reasonable fee to the developer on the sale; in any event, the developer’s expectations were that they would promote the land to obtaining planning consent and sale in the open market (whereupon they would be entitled to a fee under the express terms of the contract); the third party buyer would not be bound by the terms of the contract; and, finally, the owner put forward no extenuating circumstances or hardship.
  3. In CPC Group Ltd v Qatari Diar Real Estate Investment Co [2010] EWHC 1535 (Ch) the parties entered into a joint venture agreement to acquire

Chelsea Barracks with a view to its development. A sale and purchase agreement between the parties imposed an obligation upon both of them to act “in utmost good faith”. Vos J held at [246] that, having regard to the context, the content of this obligation was: “to adhere to the spirit of the contract, which was to seek to obtain planning consent for the maximum Developable Area in the shortest possible time, and to observe reasonable commercial standards of fair dealing, and to be faithful to the agreed common purpose, and to act consistently with the justified expectations of the parties.”

  1. While Vos J did not need “to decide whether this obligation could only be broken if [the defendant or the claimant] acted in bad faith”, he considered that “it might be hard to understand, as Lord Scott said in Manifest Shipping , how, without bad faith, there can be a breach of a ‘duty of good faith, utmost or otherwise’”. On the facts, however, he found that there had been no breach of the obligation of utmost good faith as so interpreted.

An implied duty of good faith?

  1. Although there is no general doctrine of “good faith” in English contract law, a duty of good faith is implied by law as an incident of certain categories of contract, for example, contracts between partners to a joint venture or others whose relationship is characterised as a fiduciary one.
  2. In the Yam Seng case Leggatt J saw no difficulty in implying a duty of good faith in any ordinary commercial contract based on the presumed intention of the parties. The process of implication of terms has been analysed as an exercise in the construction of the contract as a whole: see Attorney General of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009] 1 WLR 1988. The relevant background includes not only matters of fact known to the parties but also shared values and norms of behaviour. A general norm
  1. At first instance, the judge held that “it accorded with commercial common sense for there to be a general obligation on both parties to co-operate in good faith” and that the Trust’s behaviour in awarding excessive service failure points constituted a breach of this obligation. The Court of Appeal disagreed, reversing the decision below. Jackson LJ held: “the obligation to co-operate in good faith is not a general one which qualifies or reinforces all of the obligations on the parties in all situations where they interact. The obligation to co-operate in good faith is specifically focused upon the two purposes stated in the second half of the clause [namely: (i) the efficient transmission of information and instructions; and (ii) enabling the Trust or any beneficiary to derive the full benefit of the contract.]”
  2. More recently, in Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Limited v Bristol Rovers (1883) Limited [2015] EWHC 2002 (Ch), Proudman J had to decide whether Sainsbury’s reliance on a specific provision in an agreement could amount to a breach of the duty to act in good faith. In that case, Sainsbury’s agreed to buy the club’s stadium with the intention of developing it as a supermarket. The agreement was subject to a number of conditions, including that Sainsbury’s obtained ‘Acceptable Store Planning Permission’. It was agreed that if certain conditions were not satisfied by the ‘Cut Off Date’ then either party might terminate the agreement. Sainsbury’s agreed to “use all reasonable endeavours to procure the grant of an Acceptable Store Planning Permission”. Clause 2.11 provided: “[Sainsbury’s] may in its absolute discretion pursue an Appeal against a Planning Refusal but shall be obliged to do so if: (a) Planning Counsel confirms that such an Appeal has a 60% chance or greater of achieving an Acceptable Store Planning Permission on or before the Long Stop Date”. Both parties agreed “to act in good faith in relation to their respective obligations in this Agreement and to assist the other in achieving Acceptable Planning Permission for the Store Development and the Stadium Development.” Planning permission was granted but with a condition limiting deliveries to the store to certain hours, the effect of which was that there was a deemed ‘Planning

Refusal’. Sainsbury’s initial application to vary the condition was refused. Sainsbury’s wanted to terminate the agreement if it lawfully could and so, thereafter, it refused to appeal or to withdraw and resubmit an application to vary the conditions on the grounds that Planning Counsel had determined that the prospects of success were not sufficient. The club argued that Sainsbury’s reliance on the ‘black letter’ of clause 2.11 was a breach of the duty to act in good faith. Proudman J held that the duty to act in good faith did not mean that Sainsbury’s was obliged to act contrary to a specific provision of the agreement.

Conclusions

  1. Although English contract law recognises no general principle of good faith, it has become increasingly common for parties to a development agreement to agree to such clauses. In the absence of an express clause, it is now more likely that the courts will imply a duty to act in good faith, particularly where the parties have entered into a joint venture which is dependent upon co-operation between the parties. The content and scope of the duty of good faith depends on its context. Developers and landowners should not overlook the duty of good faith when taking decisions affecting a development agreement.

JONATHAN UPTON TANFIELD CHAMBERS OCTOBER 2015