Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Student Feedback on MATH 1552 Integral Calculus TA: Spring 2018, Lecture notes of Calculus

Georgia Institute of Technology. Spring 2018, MATH 1552 Integral Calculus Section G4. Instructor: Mckean, Stephen (Additional).

Typology: Lecture notes

2022/2023

Uploaded on 05/11/2023

wilbur
wilbur 🇺🇸

212 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Georgia Institute of Technology
Spring 2018, MATH 1552 Integral Calculus Section G4
Instructor: Mckean, Stephen (Additional)
There were: 29 possible respondents.
0
0
1
1
4
19
4.8
25
TA: Engaged students
37
0
0
0
0
6
19
4.8
25
TA: Classroom management
36
N/A
1 Very Poor
2
3
4
5 Exceptional
0
0
0
0
1
24
5
25
TA: Preparedness
35
N/A
1 Completely
Unprep
2
3
4
5 Extremely
Well
0
0
0
0
2
23
5
25
TA: Approachability
34
N/A
1 Strongly
Disagree
2
3
4
5 Strongly
Agree
0
0
0
0
9
16
4.7
25
TA: Stimulated interest
33
N/A
1 Ruined
Interest
2
3
4
5 Made Me
Eager
0
0
0
0
1
24
5
25
TA: Attitude about teaching
32
N/A
1 Detached
2
3
4
5 Extremely
Enthus
0
0
0
0
0
25
5
25
TA: Respect for students
31
N/A
1 Very Poor
2
3
4
5 Exceptional
0
0
0
0
1
24
5
25
TA: Concept familiarity
30
0
0
0
1
4
20
4.9
25
TA: Explained concepts clearly
29
N/A
1 Strongly
Disagree
2
3
4
5 Strongly
Agree
0
0
0
0
4
21
4.9
25
TA: Written communication
28
0
0
0
0
4
21
4.9
25
TA: Oral communication
27
N/A
1 Very Poor
2
3
4
5 Exceptional
0
12
12
25
0
25
TA: Role
25
Other
Office
Hours
Grade /
Test
Recitation
TA
Lab TA
Interpol.
Median
RR
N
Question Text
Page 1/3
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Student Feedback on MATH 1552 Integral Calculus TA: Spring 2018 and more Lecture notes Calculus in PDF only on Docsity!

Georgia Institute of Technology

Spring 2018, MATH 1552 Integral Calculus Section G Instructor: Mckean, Stephen (Additional)

There were: 29 possible respondents.

37 TA: Engaged students 25 86% 4.8 19 4 1 1 0 0

36 TA: Classroom management 25 86% 4.8 19 6 0 0 0 0

5 Exceptional 4 3 2 1 Very Poor N/A

35 TA: Preparedness 25 86% 5 24 1 0 0 0 0

5 ExtremelyWell 4 3 2 1 CompletelyUnprep N/A

34 TA: Approachability 25 86% 5 23 2 0 0 0 0

N/A

1 Strongly (^432) Disagree

5 Strongly Agree

33 TA: Stimulated interest 25 86% 4.7 16 9 0 0 0 0

N/A

1 Ruined (^432) Interest

5 Made Me Eager

32 TA: Attitude about teaching 25 86% 5 24 1 0 0 0 0

5 ExtremelyEnthus 4 3 2 1 Detached N/A

31 TA: Respect for students 25 86% 5 25 0 0 0 0 0

5 Exceptional 4 3 2 1 Very Poor N/A

30 TA: Concept familiarity 25 86% 5 24 1 0 0 0 0

29 TA: Explained concepts clearly 25 86% 4.9 20 4 1 0 0 0

N/A

1 Strongly (^432) Disagree

5 Strongly Agree

28 TA: Written communication 25 86% 4.9 21 4 0 0 0 0

27 TA: Oral communication 25 86% 4.9 21 4 0 0 0 0

5 Exceptional 4 3 2 1 Very Poor N/A

25 TA: Role 25 86% 0 25 12 12 0

Office Other Hours

Grade / Test

Recitation TA

Interpol. Lab TA Median

Question Text N RR

Classes this semester 26 90% 1 24 1 0 0 0 0 0

1-3 4-6 7-9 10-12 13-15^ 16- 18 19- 21 22+

38 TA: Overall effectiveness 24 83% 5 22 2 0 0 0 0

N/A

1 Strongly (^432) Disagree

5 Strongly Agree

TA: Improvements

Always knowledgeable, excited to help, and glad to give tips or explain what needs to be explained.

The TA was able to go through each topic clearly and work examples in a very clever way.

Great vibe within the classroom

His ability to take material from the lecture and explain it while working through the recitation problems

Understanding Students perspective on difficult topics. He ws able to communicate processes of problems effectively.

Ability to explain concepts in more than one way, and always check to see if students were understanding the material. If we were not, he would figure out which step he lost the majority of the class and try to explain the step in a different way.

Very approachable and helpful

Availability, always open to meet and discuss topics.

Very nice and respected his students.

Stephen had an ability to teach the material very similar to Grodzinzky, in a method that was the same each time, and taught the importance in understanding each step as well.

doing examples with the class to make sure we understood the concept

Great ability at explaining problems and concepts

How he helped students through the worksheets and wouldn't let them leave without a good understanding.

Very easy to understand and helpful

Stephen is hands down the best TA I've had at Tech. He clearly loves what he does and goes above and beyond what I expected of him. I would go to his office hours when my lab let out early, and he almost always stayed late, answering everyone's questions. Truly lucked out in having him as my TA. I would love to have him again.

Very enthusiastic and knew calculus very well. Always willing to help and made time for his students. Wanted to be there teaching and explained problems really well and made sure we understood

Explanations that did not simply give answers, but helped improve student learning. Such a great TA!

TA: Greatest strength

Text Responses