Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

The Plight of Farmers: The Rise of the Populist Party in the Late 1800s, Study notes of Voice

The economic struggles of farmers in the late 1800s, leading to the formation of the Populist Party. Farmers faced falling crop prices, excessive railroad shipping costs, and high-interest loans. The Populist Party proposed reforms such as an increased money supply, a graduated income tax, and government control over railroads and banks.

What you will learn

  • Why did farmers support an increased money supply?
  • What economic reforms did the Populist Party propose?
  • What were some causes of farmers' economic problems?

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

eklavya
eklavya 🇺🇸

4.5

(22)

266 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download The Plight of Farmers: The Rise of the Populist Party in the Late 1800s and more Study notes Voice in PDF only on Docsity!

Changes on the Western Frontier 219

One American's Story

Farmers and the

Populist Movement

As a young adult in the early 1870s, Mary Elizabeth Lease left home to teach school on the Kansas plains. After marrying farmer Charles Lease, she joined the growing Farmers’ Alliance movement and began speaking on issues of concern to farmers. Lease joked that her tongue was “loose at both ends and hung on a swivel,” but her gold- en voice and deep blue eyes hypnotized her listeners.

A PERSONAL VOICE MARY ELIZABETH LEASE “ What you farmers need to do is to raise less corn and more Hell! We want the accursed foreclosure system wiped out.... We will stand by our homes and stay by our fire- sides by force if necessary, and we will not pay our debts to the loan-shark companies until the Government pays its debts to us.” —quoted in “The Populist Uprising”

Farmers had endured great hardships in helping to transform the plains from the “Great American Desert” into the “breadbasket of the nation,” yet every year they reaped less and less of the bounty they had sowed with their sweat.

Farmers Unite to Address Common Problems

In the late 1800s, many farmers were trapped in a vicious economic cycle. Prices for crops were falling, and farmers often mortgaged their farms so that they could buy more land and produce more crops. Good farming land was becoming scarce, though, and banks were foreclosing on the mortgages of increasing numbers of farmers who couldn’t make payments on their loans. Moreover, the railroads were taking advantage of farmers by charging excessive prices for shipping and storage.

MAIN IDEAMAIN IDEA Terms & Names Terms & Names

•Oliver Hudson Kelley •Grange •Farmers’ Alliances •Populism

•bimetallism •gold standard •William McKinley •William Jennings Bryan

Farmers united to address

their economic problems,

giving rise to the Populist

movement.

Many of the Populist reform

issues, such as income tax

and legally protected rights of

workers, are now taken for

granted.

WHY IT MATTERS NOWWHY IT MATTERS NOW

Mary Elizabeth Lease, the daughter of Irish immigrants, was a leader of the Populist Party.

AnalyzingAnalyzing

ECONOMIC DISTRESS The troubles of the

farmers were part of a larger economic prob- lem affecting the entire nation. During the Civil War, the United States had issued almost $500 million in paper money, called greenbacks. Greenbacks could not be exchanged for silver or gold money. They were worth less than hard money of the same face value. Hard money included both coins and paper money printed in yellow ink that could be exchanged for gold. After the war, the government began to take the greenbacks out of circulation. Retiring the greenbacks caused some discontent. It increased the value of the money that stayed in circulation. It meant that farmers who had borrowed money had to pay back their loans in dollars that were worth more than the dol- lars they had borrowed. At the same time they were receiving less money for their crops. Between 1867 and 1887, for example, the price of a bushel of wheat fell from $2.00 to 68 cents. In effect, farmers lost money at every turn. Throughout the 1870s, the farmers and other debtors pushed the government to issue more money into circulation. Those tactics failed—although the Bland- Allison Act of 1878 required the government to buy and coin at least $2 million to $4 million worth of silver each month. It wasn’t enough to support the increase in the money supply that the farmers wanted.

PROBLEMS WITH THE RAILROADS Meanwhile, farmers paid outrageously

high prices to transport grain. Lack of competition among the railroads meant that it might cost more to ship grain from the Dakotas to Minneapolis by rail than from Chicago to England by boat. Also, railroads made secret agreements with middlemen—grain brokers and merchants—that allowed the railroads to control grain storage prices and to influence the market price of crops. Many farmers mortgaged their farms for credit with which to buy seed and supplies. Suppliers charged high rates of interest, sometimes charging more for items bought on credit than they did for cash purchases. Farmers got caught in a cycle of credit that meant longer hours and more debt every year. It was time for reform.

THE FARMERS’ ALLIANCES To push effectively for reforms, however, farmers

needed to organize. In 1867, Oliver Hudson Kelley started the Patrons of

220 C HAPTER 5

THE PLIGHT OF THE FARMERS Farmers were particularly hard hit in the decades leading to the financial panic of 1893. They regarded big business interests as insurmountable enemies who were bringing them to their knees and leaving them with debts at every turn. This cartoon is a warning of the dangers confronting not only the farmers but the entire nation.

SKILLBUILDER Analyzing Political Cartoons

  1. How does this cartoon depict the plight of the farmers?
  2. Who does the cartoonist suggest is responsible for the farmers’ plight? SEE SKILLBUILDER HANDBOOK, PAGE R24.

A

B

MAIN IDEAMAIN IDEA

A

Analyzing Issues Why did farmers think that an increased money supply would help solve their economic problems?

MAIN IDEA MAIN IDEA

B

Analyzing Causes What were some of the causes of farmers’ economic problems?

Investments declined, and consumer purchases, wages, and prices also fell. Panic deepened into depression as 3 million people lost their jobs. By December 1894, a fifth of the work force was unemployed. Many farm families suffered both hunger and unemployment.

SILVER OR GOLD Populists watched as the two major

political parties became deeply divided in a struggle between different regions and economic interests. Business owners and bankers of the industrialized Northeast were Republicans; the farmers and laborers of the agrarian South and West were Democrats. The central issue of the campaign was which metal would be the basis of the nation’s monetary system. On one side were the “silverites,” who favored bimetallism , a monetary system in which the government would give citi- zens either gold or silver in exchange for paper currency or checks. On the other side were President Cleveland and the “gold bugs,” who favored the gold standard —backing dollars solely with gold. The backing of currency was an important campaign issue because people regarded paper money as worthless if it could not be turned in for gold or silver. Because silver was more plentiful than gold, backing currency with both metals, as the silverites advocated, would make more cur- rency (with less value per dollar) available. Supporters of bimetallism hoped that this measure would stimulate the stagnant economy. Retaining the gold standard would pro- vide a more stable, but expensive, currency.

BRYAN AND THE “CROSS OF GOLD” Stepping into the

debate, the Populist Party called for bimetallism and free coinage of silver. Yet their strategy was undecided: should they join forces with sympathetic candidates in the major parties and risk losing their political identity, or should they nominate their own candidates and risk losing the election? As the 1896 campaign progressed, the Republican Party stated its firm com- mitment to the gold standard and nominated Ohioan William McKinley for president. After much debate, the Democratic Party came out in favor of a com- bined gold and silver standard, including unlimited coinage of silver. At the Democratic convention, former Nebraska congressman William Jennings Bryan , editor of the Omaha World-Herald , delivered an impassioned address to the assembled

222 C HAPTER 5

bankers and businessmen gold standard less money in circulation Loans would be repaid in stable money. DEFLATION

  • Prices fall.
  • Value of money increases.
  • Fewer people have money.

Gold Bugs Silverites

Gold Bugs and Silverites

Who They Were What They Wanted

Why Effects

farmers and laborers bimetallism more money in circulation Products would be sold at higher prices. INFLATION

  • Prices rise.
  • Value of money decreases.
  • More people have money.

Gold Bugs Silverites

D

KEY KEYPPLLAAYYEERR

WILLIAM JENNINGS BRYAN

William Jennings Bryan might be considered a patron saint of lost causes, largely because he let beliefs, not politics, guide his actions. He resigned his position as secretary of state (1913–

  1. under Woodrow Wilson, for example, to protest the president’s movement away from neutrality regarding the war in Europe. Near the end of his life, he went to Tennessee to assist the prosecu- tion in the Scopes “monkey trial,” contesting the teaching of evolution in public schools. He is perhaps best characterized by a quote from his own “Cross of Gold” speech: “The humblest citizen in all the land, when clad in the armor of a righteous cause, is stronger than all the hosts of error.”

MAIN IDEA MAIN IDEA

D

Analyzing Causes What caused the panic of 1893?

delegates. An excerpt of what has become known as the “Cross of Gold” speech follows.

A PERSONAL VOICE WILLIAM JENNINGS BRYAN “ Having behind us the producing masses of this nation and the world, supported by the commercial interests, the laboring interests, and the toilers everywhere, we will answer their demand for a gold standard by saying to them: You shall not press down upon the brow of labor this crown of thorns, you shall not crucify mankind upon a cross of gold.” Democratic convention speech, Chicago, July 8, 1896

Bryan won the Democratic nomination. When the Populist convention met two weeks later, the delegates were both pleased and frustrated. They liked Bryan and the Democratic platform, but they detested the Democratic vice-presidential candidate, Maine banker Arthur Sewall. Nor did they like giving up their identity as a party. They compromised by endorsing Bryan, nominating their own candidate, Thomas Watson of Georgia, for vice-president, and keeping their party organization intact.

THE END OF POPULISM Bryan faced a difficult campaign. His free-silver stand

had led gold bug Democrats to nominate their own candidate. It also weakened his support in cities, where consumers feared inflation because it would make goods more expensive. In addition, Bryan’s meager funds could not match the millions backing McKinley. Bryan tried to make up for lack of funds by campaigning in 27 states and sometimes making 20 speeches a day. McKinley, on the other hand, campaigned from his front porch, while thousands of well-known people toured the country speaking on his behalf. McKinley got approximately 7 million votes and Bryan about 6.5 million. As expected, McKinley carried the East, while Bryan carried the South and the farm vote of the Middle West. The voters of the industrial Middle West, with their fear of inflation, brought McKinley into office. With McKinley’s election, Populism collapsed, burying the hopes of the farm- ers. The movement left two powerful legacies, however: a message that the down- trodden could organize and have political impact, and an agenda of reforms, many of which would be enacted in the 20th century.

Changes on the Western Frontier 223

•Oliver Hudson Kelley •Grange

•Farmers’ Alliances •Populism

•bimetallism •gold standard

•William McKinley •William Jennings Bryan

  1. TERMS & NAMES For each term or name, write a sentence explaining its significance.

MAIN IDEA

  1. TAKING NOTES Identify the causes of the rise of the Populist Party and the effects the party had.

Which effect has the most impact today? Explain.

CRITICAL THINKING

  1. EVALUATING What do you think were the most significant factors in bringing an end to the Populist Party? Think about: - monetary policy - third-party status - source of popular support - popular participation policy

4. MAKING INFERENCES

How did the Grange and the Farmers’ Alliances pave the way for the Populist Party?

Populist Party

Causes Effects

E

William Jennings Bryan’s “Cross of Gold” speech inspired many cartoonists.

MAIN IDEAMAIN IDEA

E

Analyzing Issues Why was the metal that backed paper currency such an important issue in the 1896 presidential campaign?

Changes on the Western Frontier 225

THE BALLAD OF GREGORIO CORTEZ

In the border ballads, or corridos, of the American Southwest, few figures are as

famous as the Mexican vaquero, Gregorio Cortez. This excerpt from a ballad

about Cortez deals with a confrontation between Cortez and a group of

Texas lawmen. Although he is hotly pursued, Cortez has an amazingly long

run before being captured.

... And in the county of Kiansis They cornered him after all; Though they were more than three hundred He leaped out of their corral.

Then the Major Sheriff said, As if he was going to cry, “Cortez, hand over your weapons; We want to take you alive.”

—Anonymous, “The Ballad of Gregorio Cortez,” translated by Américo Paredes

Then said Gregorio Cortez, And his voice was like a bell, “You will never get my weapons Till you put me in a cell.”

Then said Gregorio Cortez, With his pistol in his hand, “Ah, so many mounted Rangers Just to take one Mexican!”

CHIEF SATANTA’S SPEECH AT THE MEDICINE LODGE CREEK COUNCIL

Known as the Orator of the Plains, Chief Satanta represented the Kiowa people in

the 1867 Medicine Lodge Creek negotiations with the U.S. government. The

speech from which this excerpt is taken was delivered by Satanta in Spanish but

was translated into English and widely published in leading newspapers of the day.

All the land south of the Arkansas belongs to the Kiowas and Comanches, and I don’t want to give away any of it. I love the land and the buffalo and will not part with it. I want you to understand well what I say. Write it on paper. Let the Great Father [U.S. president] see it, and let me hear what he has to say. I want you to understand also, that the Kiowas and Comanches don’t want to fight, and have not been fighting since we made the treaty. I hear a great deal of good talk from the gentlemen whom the Great Father sends us, but they never do what they say. I don’t want any of the medicine lodges [schools and churches] within the country. I want the children raised as I was. When I make peace, it is a long and lasting one—there is no end to it.... A long time ago this land belonged to our fathers; but when I go up to the river I see camps of soldiers on its banks. These soldiers cut down my timber; they kill my buffalo; and when I see that, my heart feels like bursting; I feel sorry. I have spoken. —Chief Satanta, speech at the Medicine Lodge Creek Council (1867)

Chief Satanta

▼ THINKING CRITICALLYTHINKING CRITICALLY

  1. Comparing and Contrasting Compare and contrast the views these selections give of the American frontier in the second half of the 19th century. Use details from the selections to help explain your answer. SEE SKILLBUILDER HANDBOOK, PAGE R8.

From the gauchos of the Argentine pampas to the workers on Australian sheep stations, many nations have had their own versions of the cowboys of the American West. Use the links for American Literature to research one such nation. Prepare a bulletin-board display that shows the similarities and differences between Western cowboys and their counterparts in that country.

IINTERNET ACTIVITY CLASSZONE.COM

Vaquero (modeled 1980/cast 1990), Luis Jiménez. National Museum of American Art/Art Resource, New York.