Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Evidence Law: Relevance, Authentication, Witnesses, and Privileges, Exams of Law of Evidence

A comprehensive overview of evidence law, focusing on relevance, authentication, witnesses, and privileges. It covers topics such as character evidence, best evidence rule, witness competency, leading questions, opinion testimony, credibility and impeachment, self-authenticating documents, and hearsay exceptions. The document also includes a checklist for exam preparation.

Typology: Exams

2023/2024

Available from 05/15/2024

Jayju
Jayju 🇺🇸

416 documents

1 / 21

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Evidence Questions and answers
Evidence: Relevance: Generally CORRECT ANSWERS Evidence is relevant if it
makes material fact more probable
-Judge can exclude if prejudicial value outweighs benefit:
*Confuse issue.
*Mislead jury.
*Undue delay.
*Waste of time
*Unduly cumulative.
Evidence: Relevance: Similar Occurrences CORRECT ANSWERS Six areas:
-Can't show P's accident history unless P's injuries at issue
-Can only show very similar accidents involving D if to show: 1. Dangerous
condition. 2. Causation of accident at issue. 3. Prior notice to D
-Similar occurrences admissible to raise inference of intent
-Can show comparable sales to determine issue of value
-Can use to show habit: Always, invariably, automatically
-Industrial custom as standard of care
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15

Partial preview of the text

Download Evidence Law: Relevance, Authentication, Witnesses, and Privileges and more Exams Law of Evidence in PDF only on Docsity!

Evidence: Relevance: Generally CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Evidence is relevant if it makes material fact more probable -Judge can exclude if prejudicial value outweighs benefit: *Confuse issue. *Mislead jury. *Undue delay. *Waste of time *Unduly cumulative. Evidence: Relevance: Similar Occurrences CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Six areas: -Can't show P's accident history unless P's injuries at issue -Can only show very similar accidents involving D if to show: 1. Dangerous condition. 2. Causation of accident at issue. 3. Prior notice to D -Similar occurrences admissible to raise inference of intent -Can show comparable sales to determine issue of value -Can use to show habit: Always, invariably, automatically -Industrial custom as standard of care

Evidence: Relevance: Policy Based Exclusionary Rule CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Five areas: -Liability insurance: Can only use to show ownership/control or to impeach witness -Subsequent Remedial Measure: Can only use to show control, feasibility if controverted by D -Settlement in Civil: Can't use settlement, offer to settle, facts stated, unless for impeachment or in subsequent criminal -Plea Bargain in Criminal: Offer, withdrawal, nolo contender, statement of fact made during these, are all inadmissible. -Offer to pay hospital bills inadmissible Evidence: Relevance: Character Evidence: Criminal: D's Character CORRECT ANSWERS✅ D may introduce character and reputation, opens the door -D's character trait is never an element in crime for bar -Can only testify to character trait relevant to crime -No general law abiding evidence Evidence: Relevance: Character Evidence: Criminal: D's Character: Prosecution Rebuttal CORRECT ANSWERS✅ When D opens the door, P may rebut by: have you heard/ did you know -Must have good faith rationale

Evidence: Relevance: Character Evidence: Other Crimes CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Other Crimes not admissible if propensity is the goal -UNLESS (MIMIC): *Motive *Intent (state of mind) *Mistake (show not a mistake) *Identity (closeness in time/place) *Common Scheme or Plan (similar to identity) -Conviction=Proof -Otherwise need sufficient evidence from which reasonable juror -Judge can still say prejudice outweighs -MIMIC can be used in fraud or assault Evidence: Relevance: Character Evidence: Sexual Misconduct Propensity CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Prior sexual assault or child molestation can be used for any relevant purpose Evidence: Authentication of Writing: Generally CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Document admissible if judge things reasonable juror would think original -Methods -Self Authenticating Documents -Photographs Evidence: Authentication of Writing: Methods CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Methods

-Witness -Proof of handwriting (Some familiarity, expertise) -Ancient document rule *At least 20 years old, free of suspicion, found in place of natural -Solicited Reply Document *Receive document in response to prior communication Evidence: Authentication of Writing: Self Authenticating Docs CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Self Authenticated Documents (Burden shifted to other side) *Official publication (gov) *Certified copies of public or private records (deed) *Newspaper periodicals *Labels or trade inscriptions *Acknowledged document *Commercial paper (promissory note, check) Evidence: Authentication of Writing: Photographs CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Witness may testify that "photograph is fair and accurate" -Just has to have personal knowledge Evidence: Best Evidence Rule CORRECT ANSWERS✅ If seek to prove contents of writing, must present original or excuse -Applies when: *Writing is legally operative document (deed, patent, mortgage)

Evidence: Witnesses: Generally CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Competency -Leading Questions -Using Writing *Refreshing Recollection *Past Recollection Recorded -Opinion Testimony *Lay *Expert Cross Examination Credibility and Impeachment Evidence: Witnesses: Competency CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Personal knowledge -Oath or affirmation -Dead man's statute *Some states don't allow those with interest against estate to testify about estate Evidence: Witnesses: Leading Questions CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Isn't it a fact that..." -Generally not allowed on direct. Unless: *Preliminary matters *Youthful or forgetful witness *Hostile -Generally allowed on cross

Evidence: Witnesses: Using Writing: Refreshing Recollection CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Refreshing recollection -Can't read from prepared memo (must be memory) -If memory fails, can show memo to jog (any writing) -Can't read refresher into evidence -Adversary can inspect, cross examine, introduce into evidence Evidence: Witnesses: Using Writing: Past Recollection Recorded CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Past Recollection Recorded (Hearsay exception) -Showing writing fails to jog memory -Witness has personal knowledge at former time -Writing either made by witness or adopted -Making or adopting occurs while event was fresh -Witness can vouch for accuracy of writing -Can be read into record, not evidence -Opponent can see the memo Evidence: Witnesses: Opinion Testimony: Lay CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Lay person can testify as to opinion if: -Rationally based on witness perception (personal knowledge) -Opinion will be helpful in deciding pertinent fact (drunk, sober, speeding, sane, insane) Evidence: Witnesses: Opinion Testimony: Expert CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Need -Education or experience

*Character for Truthfulness -Rehabilitation Evidence: Witnesses: Credibility and Impeachment: Bolster/impeach Own Witness CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Bolster own witness *Can't do it until credibility has been attacked *Witness can't reiterate prior consistent statement *Can say I picked him out of lineup Impeachment of own witness *Allowed without limit Evidence: Witnesses: Credibility and Impeachment: Impeachment Methods: Prior Inconsistent Statement CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Only for impeachment unless prior statement under oath, then evidence -Witness must have ability to address statement. -If witness is opposing party, this can be evidence Evidence: Witnesses: Credibility and Impeachment: Impeachment Methods: Bias, Interest or Motive to Misrepresent CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Party, friend, relative or employee of party -Expert witness being paid -Person with grudge -Court decides if witness must be confronted on stand -You can prove bias through extrinsic evidence

Evidence: Witnesses: Credibility and Impeachment: Impeachment Methods: Sensory Deficiencies CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Anything that could effect perception or memory -No confrontation required -Can use extrinsic evidence Evidence: Witnesses: Credibility and Impeachment: Impeachment Methods: Character for untruthfulness CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Any witness. -Can use criminal convictions and bad acts -Extrinsic evidence required for convictions *Felony or misdemeanor if prosecution was required to prove false statement as element of crime. *If conviction did not require proof of false statement, it must be felony *Conviction or release must be within 10 Proving -Ask witness to admit -Introduce record of conviction with intrinsic Inquiry about Bad Acts -Confrontation -No extrinsic evidence -Must have good faith basis -Must involve deceit or lying (not assault)

-No third party listening Attorney must be member of the bar or client reasonably believes -Can be representative of attorney Client -Includes person seeking to become client. Doesn't have t retain -Can be representative of client Waiver -Voluntary -Only client has power. -Survives death of client Subject matter -Partial waiver will waive other parts:

  1. If the partial disclosure is intentional
  2. If the disclosed and undisclosed concern same
  3. If fairness requires they be considered together Inadvertent waiver -Does not waive privilege if reasonable steps Exceptions -Future crime or fraud

-Client puts legal advise at issue -Attorney client dispute, unpaid fees Evidence: Privileges: Doctor Patient CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Confidential communication or information -For purpose of diagnosis or treatment of medical condition -Also applicable for psychotherapist or social worker -In federal actions solely on federal law, no psychotherapy -Can't have third party present if does not relate to medical treatment/diagnosis no privilege Exception -If patient puts physical/mental at issue Evidence: Privileges: Husband Wife CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Spousal Immunity- Criminal Cases Only -A spouse not compelled to testify against D spouse -Witness spouse can waive -Have to be married at time of trial Confidential Communication -In any type of case a spouse without consent cant disclose confidential communication -Both hold privilege -Statement or acts

-Fine if oral, under oath and during trial, hearing, deposition -Fine if being used now to rebut fabrication, motive, influence Evidence: Hearsay: Party Admissions CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Any statement made by party if it is offered against party for truth -Made by party -Is it offered against his interest Vicarious party admissions -Statement by agent/employee is admissible against principal/employer if concerns matter within scope of agency/employment and made during same Evidence: Hearsay: Criminal Right of Confrontation CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Prosecution may not use exception if: -Statement is testimonial *Grand jury *Statement made in response to police interrogation if point was to prove events relevant to criminal prosecution *Non testimonial if enabled police to meet emergency *Documents *Affidavits prepared for use are testimonial *Business record are non testimonial *Police reports prepared for prosecutorial purposes are testimonial Evidence: Hearsay: Exceptions CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Forfeiture

-Unavailable Witness (Can't use if witness is available) *Former Testimony *Statement against interest *Dying Declaration -Spontaneous Statements (Unavailability not required) *Excited utterance *Present Sense Impression *Present State of Mind *Declaration of Intent *Present Physical Condition *For purpose of medical treatment or diagnosis *Business records Evidence: Hearsay: Exceptions: Forfeiture CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Hearsay admissible if Ds wrongdoing made unavailable -Court must find preponderance of the evidence that D's conduct was motivated to prevent witness from testifying -D forfeits both hearsay exception and 6th Amendment objection Evidence: Hearsay: Exceptions: Unavailable Witness: Former Testimony CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Unavailable witness -Testimony given at former proceeding or deposition -Against party who had an opportunity and motive to cross examine or develop testimony of witness -With issue in both proceedings essentially the same

Evidence: Hearsay: Exceptions: Spontaneous Statements: Present Sense impression CORRECT ANSWERS✅ A description of an event made while the event is occurring -Declarent doesn't have time to fabricate -Don't need startling event -Doesn't matter if declarent available Evidence: Hearsay: Exceptions: Spontaneous Statements: Present State of Mind CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Contemporaneous statement about matter to which declarant has unique knowledge -State of mind -Feelings -Emotions Evidence: Hearsay: Exceptions: Spontaneous Statements: Declaration of Intent CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -Statement of intent to do something in the future Evidence: Hearsay: Exceptions: Spontaneous Statements: Present Physical Condition CORRECT ANSWERS✅ -To anyone about declarant current physical condition -Can't be backward looking Evidence: Hearsay: Exceptions: Spontaneous Statements: Medical Diagnosis CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Statement made to anyone concerning: -Past symptoms -Present symptoms

-General cause of condition -If made for purpose of medical treatment and diagnosis Evidence: Hearsay: Exceptions: Spontaneous Statements: Business Records CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Records of public office or agency setting fort: *Activities of the office or agency *Matters observed pursuant to legal duty *Finding of fact or opinion resulting from an investigation authorized by law *We don't allow police report prepared for prosecutorial purposes. Bias. Evidence: Hearsay: Exceptions: Impeachments CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Any method may be used to attack credibility of a hearsay declarant whose statement was admitted into evidence (E) EXAM CHECK LIST CORRECT ANSWERS✅ Objections Purpose (Why)

  • Relevance
  • Policy
  • Character
  • Impeachment Presentation (How)
  • Testimony
  • Document
  • Jud. Notice Hearsay