Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Material Type: Exam; Professor: Ulferts; Class: Police Community Relations; Subject: Criminal Justice; University: Sauk Valley Community College; Term: Unknown 1989;
Typology: Exams
1 / 7
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Chapter Objectives z 1. Recognize the importance of evaluations under Community Oriented Policing. z 2. Recognize the importance of the “Kansas City Experiment”. z 3. Articulate the 5 main criteria for evaluating Community Oriented Policing.
Chapter Objectives z 4. Evaluate the two types of program evaluation. z 5. Discuss methods of program evaluation.
z 1. In the evaluation of traditional policing, what was the bottom-line assessment? p. 331. z 2. What additional methods of determining traditional police effectiveness does the text describe? p. 332.
z 3. What was the Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment, and what did it show? pp. 332-333. z 4. What are the 5 evaluation criteria for Community Oriented Policing? z 1. Effectiveness pp. 337-338. z How is it determined?
z 4. Five evaluation criteria, continued z 2. Efficiency pp. 339-341. z Why are government agencies often less efficient than private corporations? z 3. Equity pp. 341-342. z What is equity?
z 9. What are the 3 basic types of surveys? p. 352. z 10.What are case studies, as related to evaluation research? pp. 356-357.
Comparative Community Oriented Policing
Chapter Objectives z 1. Recognize that Community Oriented Policing is not limited to the United States. z 2. Understand what it means to study policies from a comparative perspective. z 3. Define comparative Community Oriented Policing.
Comparative Community Oriented Policing
Chapter Objectives z 4. Discuss Community oriented policing in Canada, England and Japan. z 5. Briefly review Community Oriented Policing in other countries.
Comparative Community Oriented Policing
z 1. What is comparative Community Oriented Policing? p. 406. z 2. What 3 important reasons does Erika Fairchild (1993) list for comparing justice systems of different countries? pp. 406-408. z 1. To benefit from the experience of others.
Comparative Community Oriented Policing
z 2. Three reasons, continued z 2. To broaden understanding of other cultures and approaches to problems. z 3. To help deal with international criminal problems such as terrorism and drug smuggling.
Comparative Community Oriented Policing
z 10.Has “Community Oriented Policing” been successful in Japan? Why or why not? p. 424. z 11.What country may be the best “test case” in the world for Community Oriented Policing? p. 429. z 12.Which city and country adopted the use of a “Rollerblade Patrol”? p. 431.
Comparative Community Oriented Policing
Are there any
questions over
Chapters 12 and
14?
