Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Ethicalabsolutismandtheidealobserver, Exercises of Literature

Abstract of Ethicalabsolutismandtheidealobserver

Typology: Exercises

2014/2015

Uploaded on 10/02/2015

Gggopieee.Gaming
Gggopieee.Gaming šŸ‡¬šŸ‡§

1 document

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Ethical Absolutism and the Ideal Observer
Abstract: Roderick Firth take the position of a dispositional objective relational empirical
absolutist. This implies that (absolutist)he will analyse an object in an non-relative fashion;
also, (dispositional) he will analyse it as ā€œcontrary-to-fact conditionalā€ under certain
condition; in addition, (objectivist) he will analyse in the the truth of ethical statement which
doesn’t need the existence of experiencing a subject; furthermore, (relational) he will analyse
if a thing is related in a certain way to some other thing, either actual or hypothetical; lastly,
(empirical) he will analyse the moral data of an ethical statement. With this position in mind
he goes to create an ideal observer. An ideal observer, according to Firth, is similar to an ideal
judge, but not one, with the qualities of being omniscient with respect to non-ethical facts,
ā€˜omnipercipient,’ disinterested, dispassionate, consistent, and normal. The ideal observer is
omniscient states that it know everything about the fact, past, future. He, ideal observer, is
ā€˜omnipercipient’ meaning that has the ultimate imagination, able to think of outcome of an
act and thinking of a stranger as families. He is disinterested, showing that he is not
influenced by particular interest. He is dispassionate, implying that he is not influenced by
emotions. He is consistent as a result of all his characteristic. Lastly, he is normal, showing
that the properties of an ideal observer can’t go beyond the limit of ā€œnormality.ā€ With this
being refer to as the ideal observer, Firth concludes that ethical statement are statements
about an ideal observer and his ethically-significant reactions.

Partial preview of the text

Download Ethicalabsolutismandtheidealobserver and more Exercises Literature in PDF only on Docsity!

Ethical Absolutism and the Ideal Observer

Abstract: Roderick Firth take the position of a dispositional objective relational empirical absolutist. This implies that (absolutist)he will analyse an object in an non-relative fashion; also, (dispositional) he will analyse it as ā€œcontrary-to-fact conditionalā€ under certain condition; in addition, (objectivist) he will analyse in the the truth of ethical statement which doesn’t need the existence of experiencing a subject; furthermore, (relational) he will analyse if a thing is related in a certain way to some other thing, either actual or hypothetical; lastly, (empirical) he will analyse the moral data of an ethical statement. With this position in mind he goes to create an ideal observer. An ideal observer, according to Firth, is similar to an ideal judge, but not one, with the qualities of being omniscient with respect to non-ethical facts, ā€˜omnipercipient,’ disinterested, dispassionate, consistent, and normal. The ideal observer is omniscient states that it know everything about the fact, past, future. He, ideal observer, is ā€˜omnipercipient’ meaning that has the ultimate imagination, able to think of outcome of an act and thinking of a stranger as families. He is disinterested, showing that he is not influenced by particular interest. He is dispassionate, implying that he is not influenced by emotions. He is consistent as a result of all his characteristic. Lastly, he is normal, showing that the properties of an ideal observer can’t go beyond the limit of ā€œnormality.ā€ With this being refer to as the ideal observer, Firth concludes that ethical statement are statements about an ideal observer and his ethically-significant reactions.