



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The importance of intertwining critical thinking and knowledge acquisition in college education, as opposed to focusing solely on content coverage. The article argues that students' ability to think critically is most likely to develop when they are encouraged to ask and answer questions about the subject matter. The document also suggests various teaching methods, such as small group work and frequent writing assignments, to facilitate this process. The article provides references to several studies and educational programs that have implemented this approach.
Typology: Essays (university)
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Volume 1, Number 1, 1989- 90 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education.
Students frequently complain when professors require them to think critically about course concepts. Professors, in turn, are often surprised or even offended by these complaints. Yet when we consider the intellectual demands of critical thinking, and the virtual absence of instruction students receive in how to use knowledge, we can see why thinking critically about an unfamiliar subject might be challenging- even threatening-to many students. Critical thinking is often thought to be a general ability that students either possess or lack, but much of what critical thinking entails is specific to particular fields and can be learned (see Kurfiss, 1988, for a review). However, learning to think rarely enters the educational scene when "covering" a fixed quantity of "content" occupies center stage in teaching. Must acquisition of knowledge precede thinking, as many educators seem to believe? Critical thinking is the mental work involved when we investigate complex questions. The quality of the outcome depends upon many factors, including:
grading less traumatic and even potentially satisfying. You can still test "content." Students learn it because they have been using it to develop their ideas and bolster their arguments. Courses that use questioning to integrate knowledge acquisition and thinking contradict widely shared assumptions about learning. But the benefits of learning based on questions are being recognized. For example, two major medical schools, McMaster and Harvard, have designed their programs to involve students in active problem- solving rather than memorization. Other examples can be found in Bouton and Garth (1983), Kurfiss (1988) and Weaver (1989). The Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky said that what a child can do with assistance today, she can do by herself tomorrow. Conversely, what she does not receive assistance to do today, she is unlikely to do on her own in the future. College professors are the people most qualified to assist students in learning to think critically. The responsibility is as great as the rewards. References Barnes, C. P. "Questioning in College Classrooms." In Studies of College Teaching, edited by C.L. Ellner & C. P. Barnes. Lexington, MA.: Lexington Books. 1983. Bouton, C. and R. Y. Garth, eds. Learning in Groups. New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 14. San Francisco: JosseyBass. 1983. Griffith, C. W. Teaching Writing in All Disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 12. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 198 2. Kurfiss, J. C. Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice, and Possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.2. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Newell, G. "Learning from Writing in Two Content Areas: A Case
Study/Protocol Analysis." Research in the Teaching of English, 18 (3), 265-287. 1984. Weaver, F.W., ed. Promoting Inquiry in Undergraduate Learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 38. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1989.