Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Importance of Integrating Critical Thinking & Knowledge Acquisition in College, Essays (university) of Education Planning And Management

The importance of intertwining critical thinking and knowledge acquisition in college education, as opposed to focusing solely on content coverage. The article argues that students' ability to think critically is most likely to develop when they are encouraged to ask and answer questions about the subject matter. The document also suggests various teaching methods, such as small group work and frequent writing assignments, to facilitate this process. The article provides references to several studies and educational programs that have implemented this approach.

Typology: Essays (university)

2020/2021

Uploaded on 05/04/2021

oliver97
oliver97 🇺🇸

4.4

(43)

324 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Essays on Teaching Excellence
Toward the Best in the Academy
Volume 1, Number 1, 1989-90
A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in
Higher Education.
Critical Thinking by Design!
Joanne Gainen Kurfiss, Santa Clara University
Students frequently complain when professors require them to think
critically about course concepts. Professors, in turn, are often
surprised or even offended by these complaints. Yet when we
consider the intellectual demands of critical thinking, and the virtual
absence of instruction students receive in how to use knowledge, we
can see why thinking critically about an unfamiliar subject might be
challenging- even threatening-to many students.
Critical thinking is often thought to be a general ability that students
either possess or lack, but much of what critical thinking entails is
specific to particular fields and can be learned (see Kurfiss, 1988, for
a review). However, learning to think rarely enters the educational
scene when "covering" a fixed quantity of "content" occupies center
stage in teaching. Must acquisition of knowledge precede thinking,
as many educators seem to believe?
Critical thinking is the mental work involved when we investigate
complex questions. The quality of the outcome depends upon many
factors, including:
How much we know about the subject and how easily we can
retrieve relevant information;
What we know about how to conduct inquiry in a particular
subject (which includes the kinds of questions we ask and how
we attempt to answer them);
How well we organize our inquiry (for example, the goals we set
and the ways we monitor and revise them);
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Importance of Integrating Critical Thinking & Knowledge Acquisition in College and more Essays (university) Education Planning And Management in PDF only on Docsity!

Essays on Teaching Excellence

Toward the Best in the Academy

Volume 1, Number 1, 1989- 90 A publication of The Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education.

Critical Thinking by Design

Joanne Gainen Kurfiss, Santa Clara University

Students frequently complain when professors require them to think critically about course concepts. Professors, in turn, are often surprised or even offended by these complaints. Yet when we consider the intellectual demands of critical thinking, and the virtual absence of instruction students receive in how to use knowledge, we can see why thinking critically about an unfamiliar subject might be challenging- even threatening-to many students. Critical thinking is often thought to be a general ability that students either possess or lack, but much of what critical thinking entails is specific to particular fields and can be learned (see Kurfiss, 1988, for a review). However, learning to think rarely enters the educational scene when "covering" a fixed quantity of "content" occupies center stage in teaching. Must acquisition of knowledge precede thinking, as many educators seem to believe? Critical thinking is the mental work involved when we investigate complex questions. The quality of the outcome depends upon many factors, including:

  • How much we know about the subject and how easily we can retrieve relevant information;
  • What we know about how to conduct inquiry in a particular subject (which includes the kinds of questions we ask and how we attempt to answer them);
  • How well we organize our inquiry (for example, the goals we set and the ways we monitor and revise them);
  • Our assumption that knowledge is constructed through human inquiry and must be judged according to criteria of adequacy rather than standards of ultimate truth (a view shared by academics but generally not by undergraduates), and
  • How much we care about the work (Kurfiss, 1988). When courses are designed to emphasize knowledge acquisition, only the first of these facets of critical thinking comes into play. The rest are left to a hypothetical future which materializes, if at all, in graduate school. So when we ask students to think about course content, we should not be surprised if they object. They have not been taught how to think about the subject, and they may have no intrinsic reason to pursue it. If we believe students cannot think until they "know" a lot, and if teaching for information crowds out learning to think, how and when will critical thinking abilities develop? To escape this impasse, let's explore an alternative proposition: students' ability and willingness to think critically are most likely to develop when knowledge acquisition and thinking about content are intertwined rather than sequential. I have said that critical thinking is the mental work involved in formulating and pursuing complex questions. Questions are powerful motivators of inquiry; what frontiers of knowledge have ever been pushed back without them? Yet questions are disturbingly absent from college classrooms. Less than 4% of class time is spent in questioning, and fewer than one-third of professors' questions invite complex thinking. Students' questions are rarely heard in classrooms (Barnes, 1983). The absence of questions is the direct consequence of our faith in the content coverage myth. When our goal is to "cover" the content, efficiency and accuracy in delivery of information become measures of "effectiveness." If we ask questions, we may have to "waste" time correcting inaccuracies in students' responses. If we permit students to ask questions, we may fail to reach our content goals. Yet students' "inaccurate" answers to our questions, and their "irrelevant" questions to us, reveal the true "effectiveness" of our "delivery system."

grading less traumatic and even potentially satisfying. You can still test "content." Students learn it because they have been using it to develop their ideas and bolster their arguments. Courses that use questioning to integrate knowledge acquisition and thinking contradict widely shared assumptions about learning. But the benefits of learning based on questions are being recognized. For example, two major medical schools, McMaster and Harvard, have designed their programs to involve students in active problem- solving rather than memorization. Other examples can be found in Bouton and Garth (1983), Kurfiss (1988) and Weaver (1989). The Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky said that what a child can do with assistance today, she can do by herself tomorrow. Conversely, what she does not receive assistance to do today, she is unlikely to do on her own in the future. College professors are the people most qualified to assist students in learning to think critically. The responsibility is as great as the rewards. References Barnes, C. P. "Questioning in College Classrooms." In Studies of College Teaching, edited by C.L. Ellner & C. P. Barnes. Lexington, MA.: Lexington Books. 1983. Bouton, C. and R. Y. Garth, eds. Learning in Groups. New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 14. San Francisco: JosseyBass. 1983. Griffith, C. W. Teaching Writing in All Disciplines. New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 12. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 198 2. Kurfiss, J. C. Critical Thinking: Theory, Research, Practice, and Possibilities. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.2. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education.

Newell, G. "Learning from Writing in Two Content Areas: A Case

Study/Protocol Analysis." Research in the Teaching of English, 18 (3), 265-287. 1984. Weaver, F.W., ed. Promoting Inquiry in Undergraduate Learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 38. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1989.