

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
ES MI CUADERNO DE FOTOCOPIAS DE LAS ACTIVIDADES
Typology: Thesis
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación Managing Unit: Escuela de Ciencias de la Educación Program: Licenciatura en Lenguas Extranjeras con Énfasis en Inglés Course: English III Code: 518007 Evaluation Rubric - Task 2 - Lessons from My English Teachers Table 1. Evaluation Rubric. Element Description Learning outcome: Learning Outcome 2: Explain learning ideas and experiences demonstrating fluency and coherence in oral and written interaction through academic discussions. Type of activity: Independent Activity score: 80 points First evaluation criterion : The student reflects on the teaching styles, strengths and weaknesses of their previous English teachers. This criterion has a maximum score of: 30 points High Level : The analysis is logically structured, with clear connections between ideas. Transitions are smooth, and the overall flow enhances comprehension of the reflective content. If your work is at this level, you can get between 24 points and 30 points. Medium Level : The analysis is generally coherent, with some logical connections between ideas. However, transitions may be awkward or unclear at times, affecting overall flow. If your work is at this level, you can get between 18 points and 23 points Low Level : The analysis lacks coherence, with poorly connected ideas that make it difficult to follow. Transitions are missing or ineffective, disrupting the flow of the content.
If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point and 17 points. Not Submitted : The student did not submit the document. 0 points will be awarded at this level Second evaluation criterion : The student uses correct grammar structures when imagining themselves as their past teachers. This criterion has a maximum score of: 30 points High Level : The student demonstrates excellent control of grammar, using the third conditional tense, comparatives, superlatives, and correct past tense verb structures accurately throughout the analysis. Language is varied and precise, enhancing clarity. Minor errors, if any, do not affect overall communication. If your work is at this level, you can get between 24 points and 30 points. Medium Level : The student demonstrates reasonable control of grammar, using the third conditional tense, comparatives, and superlatives and past tense verb structures, but occasional mistakes are present. These errors do not usually interfere with overall understanding. Language is clear but may lack variety and precision at times. If your work is at this level, you can get between 18 points and 23 points. Low Level : The student shows limited control of grammar, with frequent mistakes in the use of the third conditional tense, comparatives, and superlatives. Errors in past tense verb structures are common and may occasionally affect clarity. The language used is simple and may lead to some confusion due to grammatical inaccuracies. If your work is at this level, you can get between 1 point and 17 points. Not Submitted : No reflections were submitted. 0 points will be awarded at this level.