

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
A court order from the high court of justice, queen’s bench division, regarding a lawsuit involving chelsea football club limited and several claimants. The order includes provisions for witness identity protection, responses to part 18 requests, re-amending defenses, setting aside or varying orders, and trial dates. The order also includes instructions for costs and interim payments.
What you will learn
Typology: Study notes
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
In the HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN’S BENCH DIVISION Before the Honourable Mrs Justice Stacey
Claim No
Fee Account Number PBA
(including ref)
AXM, ZXQ, YXC and RXS DNO53436.
Defendant(s) (including ref) Chelsea Football Club Limited
UPON hearing Counsel for the Claimants and Counsel for the Defendant.
AND UPON the Defendant, through its Counsel, agreeing to provide a copy of the application notice and any evidence in support of the application made to Master McCloud for permission to rely upon the witness summaries, referred to in her order dated 26 January, by 4 pm on 25 May 2021.
AND UPON it appearing that the application bundle inadvertently contains references to the real name of the witness who otherwise is known as BXA in these proceedings.
AND UPON consideration of BXA’s Article 8 right to respect for private and family life and the Article 10 right of freedom of expression and that the case is likely to attract publicity and that revealing the identity of BXA is likely unfairly to damage the interests of BXA and that, accordingly, publication of details revealing BXA’s identity ought to be prohibited.
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
Dated the 11 May 2021