Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Divine Command Theory, Summaries of Religious Studies

Almost every religion on earth has some divine entity. The followers belive in divin might without any questions.

Typology: Summaries

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

sumaira
sumaira 🇺🇸

4.8

(57)

263 documents

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
An Introduction to Religion and Ethics Eduqas AS Knowledge Organiser:
Theme 1A Divine Command Theory
Key words:
Divine Command revelation strong weak
Euthyphro dilemma omnipotence omnibenevolence modified
arbitrariness injustices Adams
benevolent nature Baggini another question
Key quotes:
“...if you obey my voice and keep my covenant,
you shall be my treasured possession out of all the
peoples.” (Exodus 19:5)
“There are some whose killing God orders, either
by law, or by an express command to a particular
person at a particular time.” (Augustine)
“If I am liable to be sent to hell for not doing what
God commands, I am thereby provided with a
corrupting...motive for serving the good.”
(A. McIntyre)
“God, if he exists, is the greatest relativist of them
all.” (J. Baggini)
Key arguments/debates
The main debate is that some philosophers see
morality as something external to God and there are
many different non-theistic explanations for morality.
Others would argue that if morality had a divine
source there would be similar moral systems between
religions.
Key questions
Does Adams solve the Euthyphro dilemma?
Are there better alternatives to Divine Command
theory?
Issues for analysis and evaluation:
Divine Command theory is usually associated with
religious traditions that see morality as part of divine
revelation.
God establishes a moral order as an omnipotent and
omnibenevolent being for the good of humanity.
Divine Command Theory followers associate the sense of
‘right’ and ‘wrong’ as something given by God and directly
related to teachings of scripture.
For example, the 10 commandments or the revelations
found in the Qur’an. From this, human beings are
directed to right behaviour.
Strong Divine Command Theory sees all scripture as
detailing behaviour; weak Divine Command Theory
argues that God gives commands that determine the
boundaries and content of one’s decision making e.g. the
general moral duties extracted from teachings such as
the Sermon on the Mount.
Other challenges have been raised including:
There is too much variation within and between religions
to take Divine Command theory seriously.
Divine Command Theory seemingly promotes injustices
against women, homosexuality and accepts the existence
of slavery.
Jesus demonstrated the internal conflict between the
old laws and the new kingdom he was establishing
suggesting that some Divine Command theory rules can
be dispensed with or at best reinterpreted.
Key concepts:
The traditional challenge to Divine Command theory is
Euthyphro dilemma.
Plato’s historical character Socrates raises an important
question for the character Euthyphro about the
foundation of ‘goodness’.
Is the holy approved by the Gods because it is holy or is
it holy because it is approved by the Gods? (holy refers to
ethical goodness).
This has two important implications for the omnipotence
and omnibenevolence of God:
1. If God commands something because it is morally right
then this means morality is independent of God and is
something God neither created nor controls. Therefore
God is not omnipotent.
2. If something is good because God says it is then this
means that the ‘objectivity’ of morality is dependent
upon God. This means that it is arbitrary in theory since
God could will genocide to be good. The arbitrariness
problem begs the question of God’s omnibenevolence.
The philosopher Robert Adams modified Divine
Command theory to meet the Euthyphro challenge,
specifically the second criticism.
Adams proposed that goodness is part of God’s being and
as such cannot be arbitrary since goodness dictates that
God would never command anything beyond this.
Julian Baggini responded by pointing out that this just
raises another question: is God’s nature good because it
is God’s or because it is good?

Partial preview of the text

Download Divine Command Theory and more Summaries Religious Studies in PDF only on Docsity!

An Introduction to Religion and Ethics Eduqas AS Knowledge Organiser:

Theme 1A Divine Command Theory

Key words:

Divine Command revelation strong weak Euthyphro dilemma omnipotence omnibenevolence modified arbitrariness injustices Adams benevolent nature Baggini another question

Key quotes:

“...if you obey my voice and keep my covenant,

you shall be my treasured possession out of all the

peoples.” (Exodus 19:5)

“There are some whose killing God orders, either

by law, or by an express command to a particular

person at a particular time.” (Augustine)

“If I am liable to be sent to hell for not doing what

God commands, I am thereby provided with a

corrupting...motive for serving the good.”

(A. McIntyre)

“God, if he exists, is the greatest relativist of them

all.” (J. Baggini)

Key arguments/debates The main debate is that some philosophers see morality as something external to God and there are many different non-theistic explanations for morality. Others would argue that if morality had a divine source there would be similar moral systems between religions. Key questions Does Adams solve the Euthyphro dilemma? Are there better alternatives to Divine Command theory?

Issues for analysis and evaluation:

Divine Command theory is usually associated with religious traditions that see morality as part of divine revelation. ■ God establishes a moral order as an omnipotent and omnibenevolent being for the good of humanity. ■ Divine Command Theory followers associate the sense of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ as something given by God and directly related to teachings of scripture. ■ For example, the 10 commandments or the revelations found in the Qur’an. From this, human beings are directed to right behaviour. ■ Strong Divine Command Theory sees all scripture as detailing behaviour; weak Divine Command Theory argues that God gives commands that determine the boundaries and content of one’s decision making e.g. the general moral duties extracted from teachings such as the Sermon on the Mount. ■ Other challenges have been raised including: ■ There is too much variation within and between religions to take Divine Command theory seriously. ■ Divine Command Theory seemingly promotes injustices against women, homosexuality and accepts the existence of slavery. ■ Jesus demonstrated the internal conflict between the old laws and the new kingdom he was establishing suggesting that some Divine Command theory rules can be dispensed with or at best reinterpreted.

Key concepts:

■ The traditional challenge to Divine Command theory is Euthyphro dilemma. ■ Plato’s historical character Socrates raises an important question for the character Euthyphro about the foundation of ‘goodness’. ■ Is the holy approved by the Gods because it is holy or is it holy because it is approved by the Gods? (holy refers to ethical goodness). ■ This has two important implications for the omnipotence and omnibenevolence of God: ■ 1. If God commands something because it is morally right then this means morality is independent of God and is something God neither created nor controls. Therefore God is not omnipotent. ■ 2. If something is good because God says it is then this means that the ‘objectivity’ of morality is dependent upon God. This means that it is arbitrary in theory since God could will genocide to be good. The arbitrariness problem begs the question of God’s omnibenevolence. ■ The philosopher Robert Adams modified Divine Command theory to meet the Euthyphro challenge, specifically the second criticism. ■ Adams proposed that goodness is part of God’s being and as such cannot be arbitrary since goodness dictates that God would never command anything beyond this. ■ Julian Baggini responded by pointing out that this just raises another question: is God’s nature good because it is God’s or because it is good?