Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Diatomic Molecules: Nuclear and Electronic Interactions, Lecture notes of Chemistry

The interactions between nuclei and electrons in diatomic molecules using the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Topics include potential energy curves, rigid rotor and harmonic oscillator approximations, centrifugal distortion, and vibrational-rotational coupling. The document also discusses the use of a minimal basis set in a LCAO approach.

What you will learn

  • How does a minimal basis set LCAO approach help in understanding the ground state of diatomic molecules?
  • What is vibrational-rotational coupling and how does it arise in diatomic molecules?
  • What is the Born-Oppenheimer approximation and how is it used to study diatomic molecules?
  • What is centrifugal distortion and how does it affect the rotational terms in diatomic molecules?
  • What are the rigid rotor and harmonic oscillator approximations in the context of diatomic molecules?

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

dewan
dewan 🇺🇸

4.6

(17)

254 documents

1 / 11

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Diatomic Molecules
Chem 2430
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Diatomic Molecules: Nuclear and Electronic Interactions and more Lecture notes Chemistry in PDF only on Docsity!

Diatomic Molecules

Chem 2430

2

2

2

2

2

2

ˆ^2

i^2 i^

i^

j^ i

e^

B^

i^

ij

Z Z e^

Z e^

e

H^

m^

m^

r^

r^

r

^ 

 

^ 

^

 ^
^ ^
^ ^
^

^

^

^

^

^

,^ :i j^

,^ :  ^ nuclei

electrons

Born-Oppenheimer approximation

2

2

2

2

ˆ^1 e^2

i i

i^

j^ i

e^

i^

ij

Z e

h^

e

H^

m^

r^

r

 



^ ^

^

^

Assumes that we can separate the electronic andnuclear degrees of freedom, since electrons movemuch faster than nuclei

For fixed nuclear positions

 ^

 ^

  1 1

1 1

ˆ^

i^

i^

i e^ e^

e^ e

H^

E

v = 0^

De

U

2

ˆ^
(^ )
N^2
H^
U R

^ m  ^

^ 

Full^ non

‐relativistic

H^ for

molecules

( )^

( ) 1

(^ )^

(^ )^

(^ )

i^

i e

NN

U R^

E^ R

V^

R

^

^

Here^ R

is^ used

to^ represent

the

collection

of^ all^

nuclear

positions

v = 1

D^0 R

Potential

energy

curve

of

a^ diatomic

molecule

V^ representsNN^

the^ nuclear repulsion

^ ^

^ 

^ ^

^

^

^ 

^ 

^

 2

2

2

2 2 e 2

2

3

R

e

e

e^

e

J^ J^

R^ R

J^ J^

J^ J

U^ R^

U^

k^ R^

R

R^

R^

R

^ 

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

^

If we keep only the first three terms we obtain

^ ^

1 ^  v^

1 2 e^

e

E^ U^

R^

J^ J^

B  ^

 ^   ^

^ 

^

 ^ ^ 

i.e., the rigid rotor plus harmonic oscillator

^

^  1 ^202 e

J^ J e

dU^ k

R^ R

dR^

R 

^

^ 

^ 

(^2)

min^

e

J^ J e

R^

R^

R^

k

^ 

^ 

However, due to the last term in the Eq. for

U(R),

the potential energy minimum is shifted from R

.e

To find the new minimum calculate dU/dRSubstituting back into the rotational terms gives

^ ^

(^22 2)     (^42) 2

3 1

1 2

2 e^

e J^ J^

J^ J R^

R^ k 

 ^

 ^

 ^

Centrifugal distortion

^ 

(^1) v

e

J^ J

^ ^ R 

^
^

The vibrational/rotational couplingcan be interpreted as a v-dependentrotational constant, B

v^ e^

e

B^ B

^ v 

^ 

^

^

If we keep the next term (quadratic in R-R

) in the series expansion of the rotational,e

this leads to a modified force constant for the vibration, and leads to vibrational-rotational coupling:^ Actually

the^ coefficient

of^ the

(v^ +^ ½)J(J+1)

is supposed to be negativeThere is another contribution whicharises from the cubic term in the potential

1 |^

AA^

A^

A

H^

s^ H^

s ^

1 |^

BB^

B^

B

H^

s^ H^

s

1 |^

AB^

A^

B

H^

s^ H^

s

^

1 |1AB A^

B

S^

s^ s

For H^2

+^ AA

H^ H^ BB

(if we were considering

(^2)

,^

AA^

BB

HeH^

H^

H

^

kR

S^ e^ AB

kR^

k R

^ 

^

^ 

^

Let

3

krA,

ks A

e 

3

krB

ks B

e 

 ^

2

2

1

kR

H^ AA

k^ k^

e^ k

R

 R

^

^ ^

^

^  

kR

AB^

AB H^

k S^

k^ k

kR e

 ^
^ 

For^ derivation

see http://www2.chem.umd.edu/groups/alexander/chem691/Chap3.pdf

^

^

^  

^

2

2

2

2 2

kR^

kR

kR

k^ k^

kR e^

k^ k^

kR e

R^ R

E^

k^

k R

e^

^ kR

^

^ ^

^

^

^

^

 ^

^

^ 

As^

R^  

E^

k^ k^

k

 ^ 

^ 

12 k^ k ^2

Note if

1,^

k^

E  

which is just the energy of anH atom

U^ E

  R

For^

k^ goes from

1 at^ R =

^ to^2

at^ R = 0

at^ R,^ (~ 2.0 Bohrs)e

k = 1.

E

U^ and^ E

for^ theel

ground

state^ of

+ H 2

(from^ Levine)

k^ =^2 in

the^ R^ ‐

^0 limit from^ the

above eq.

R^  ^0 R

H^

H

 He

U^  

E^  ^

U^   2 E^  

E at minimum = -1.1033auU at minimum= -0.6026au

(D

= 2.79eV)e

1 ^ g 1 ^ u^11 bondinganti-bonding ^ g ^ u

1 1 A^

B

s^ s 1 1 A^

B

s^ s

in the separated atom limit

^1 He s^ ^  ^2 He p^ 

For^ the^ in the united atom limit

ground

state^

+of H 2

Low‐lying

MO's^

from^ AOs

United

atom^

to^ separated

atom^

orbital

correlation

diagram