Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Assessing ESU Economics Program: Personnel, Finances, and Student Learning, Exams of Microeconomics

An assessment of the economics program at esu, including personnel needs and issues, allocation of financial resources, development of new programs, making program changes, and faculty and student participation in the assessment process. The document also includes findings from data analysis and the extent of faculty and student participation in the assessment program.

Typology: Exams

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/06/2009

koofers-user-bhm
koofers-user-bhm 🇺🇸

1

(1)

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Economics Assessment
1. Determining personnel needs/issues
The economics program at ESU is typical of respected undergraduate programs at
other universities as reported in the American Economic Review both in its core
and total hours required. The current faculty and course offerings in the College
of Liberal Arts and Sciences and the School of Business (e.g., support courses).
2. Allocating financial resources
Faculty salaries are the essential part of allocating financial resources since the
program uses existing university resources (e.g., computer labs).
3. Developing new programs
No new programs are currently being developed.
4. Making program changes
Based on student input the department is currently developing an experiential
component to the program.
5. Accomplishing departmental goals
The experiential component mentioned above is consistent with departmental
goals.
6. Any professional development targeting student teaching and learning
Faculty development through participation in economic education conferences
occurs at the National Association of Economic Educators (NAEE), Midwest
Economic Education Conference (MEEC), and the Missouri Valley Economic
Economics Association (MVEA).
7. What do your findings/conclusions from data analysis suggest about your
students, programs, student learning (content understanding/skill
development), and/or attainment of program goals/mission?
Student feedback from an independent focus group reported strengths in
analytical skills and flexibility. Areas for improvement included collective work
on projects outside the normal classroom or research projects.
8. Extent of faculty participation in the plan(s), its implementation and decision
making?
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Assessing ESU Economics Program: Personnel, Finances, and Student Learning and more Exams Microeconomics in PDF only on Docsity!

Economics Assessment

1. Determining personnel needs/issues

The economics program at ESU is typical of respected undergraduate programs at other universities as reported in the American Economic Review both in its core and total hours required. The current faculty and course offerings in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences and the School of Business (e.g., support courses).

2. Allocating financial resources

Faculty salaries are the essential part of allocating financial resources since the program uses existing university resources (e.g., computer labs).

3. Developing new programs

No new programs are currently being developed.

4. Making program changes

Based on student input the department is currently developing an experiential component to the program.

5. Accomplishing departmental goals

The experiential component mentioned above is consistent with departmental goals.

6. Any professional development targeting student teaching and learning

Faculty development through participation in economic education conferences occurs at the National Association of Economic Educators (NAEE), Midwest Economic Education Conference (MEEC), and the Missouri Valley Economic Economics Association (MVEA).

7. What do your findings/conclusions from data analysis suggest about your students, programs, student learning (content understanding/skill development), and/or attainment of program goals/mission?

Student feedback from an independent focus group reported strengths in analytical skills and flexibility. Areas for improvement included collective work on projects outside the normal classroom or research projects.

8. Extent of faculty participation in the plan(s), its implementation and decision making?

Due to the relatively small size of the program faculty participation continuous, and extensive.

9. Extent of student participation in discussing your assessment program(s).

In the major overhaul of the assessment plan for economics, students played a prominent role. Before, their input was virtually nonexistent.

10. Are both UG and Grad programs equally implemented? If not, please explain.

The graduate program in economics was discontinued at the request of the economics faculty in the late 1978 so the program could specialize in undergraduate education. A few courses in economic education are offered for teachers through the Center for Economic Education which achieved the highest level of affiliation with the National Council on Economic Education in every one of its five-year reviews.

11. What major changes are you introducing this year to the plan(s)?

The entire plan is being developed beginning with a mission statement.

12. How many semesters have your various direct and indirect measures generated data? List each tool used and the number of semesters you have data on file for that measure.

Tool Focus group: Our focus group began in February 2004.

Course achievements: We have course grades for the past twenty years.

Student evaluations: We have twenty years of student evaluations and summaries.

Portfolios: We have course portfolios for EC 101, EC 305, and EC 306 dating to

Survey: Placement office surveys and senior surveys have been reviewed annually for the past ten years.

Feedback from employers and internships: This information is not in record form.

Feedback from Alumni: This includes achievement of advanced degrees and employment activity for the past twenty years.