Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

d'Alembert's solution of one-dimensional wave equation, Lecture notes of Physics

This is the d'Alembert formula. Let us give a geometric (or physical) interpretation of the first solution. (5). Assume without loss of ...

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

mayer
mayer 🇬🇧

4.8

(5)

227 documents

1 / 6

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
d’Alembert’s solution of one-dimensional wave
equation
A. Eremenko
January 26, 2021
1. Solution on the line
Problem. To find the general solution of the one-dimensional wave equa-
tion on the whole line,
utt =c2uxx.(1)
Solution (due to d’Alembert). Let us introduce new independent variables:
ξ=x+ct, η =xct,
so that
x= (ξ+η)/2, t = (ξη)/(2c).
Then the new function is
w(ξ, η ) = u(x, y) = u((ξ+η)/2,(ξη)/(2c)).
To obtain a differential equation for w, we differentiate with respect to ξ:
wξ=1
2ux ξ+η
2,ξη
2c!+1
2cut ξ+η
2,ξη
2c!,
and then differentiate with respect to η:
wξη =1
4uxx 1
4cuxt +1
4cutx 1
4c2utt.
Since uxt =utx the two middle terms cancel, and we obtain from (1) that
wξη = 0.(2)
1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download d'Alembert's solution of one-dimensional wave equation and more Lecture notes Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

d’Alembert’s solution of one-dimensional wave

equation

A. Eremenko

January 26, 2021

  1. Solution on the line

Problem. To find the general solution of the one-dimensional wave equa- tion on the whole line, utt = c^2 uxx. (1)

Solution (due to d’Alembert). Let us introduce new independent variables:

ξ = x + ct, η = x − ct,

so that x = (ξ + η)/ 2 , t = (ξ − η)/(2c).

Then the new function is

w(ξ, η) = u(x, y) = u((ξ + η)/ 2 , (ξ − η)/(2c)).

To obtain a differential equation for w, we differentiate with respect to ξ:

wξ =

ux

( ξ + η 2

ξ − η 2 c

)

2 c

ut

( ξ + η 2

ξ − η 2 c

) ,

and then differentiate with respect to η:

wξη =

uxx −

4 c

uxt +

4 c

utx −

4 c^2

utt.

Since uxt = utx the two middle terms cancel, and we obtain from (1) that

wξη = 0. (2)

This is easy to solve: wξ must be independent of η, so wξ = f 1 (ξ) for some function f 1 , and integrating this with respect to ξ we obtain that w(ξ, η) = f (ξ) + g(η), for some function f , such that f ′^ = f 1 , and some function g, the “constant of integration”. Returning to our original variables we obtain

u(x, t) = f (x + ct) + g(x − ct), (3)

Now it is easy to check directly that such a function u with arbitrary differ- entiable functions f and g satisfies equation (1). So we obtained a general solution which depends on two arbitrary functions.

Equation (1) describes oscillations of an infinite string, or a wave in 1- dimensional medium. To single out a unique solution we impose initial con- ditions at t = 0: u(x, 0) = φ(x) ut(x, 0) = ψ(x), (4)

that is we specify the initial position and initial velocity of the string. To simplify our computation, we can use the Superposition Principle: first find a solution with arbitrary given φ and ψ = 0, then find a solution with φ = 0 and arbitrary ψ, and then take the sum of these two solutions. For the first solution we plug t = 0 into (3) and obtain

f + g = φ, f − g = 0,

so f = g = φ/2, and the first solution, with zero initial velocity, is

u 1 (x, t) =

(φ(x + ct) + ψ(x − ct)). (5)

For the second solution we differentiate (3) with respect to t and plug t = 0. We obtain f + g = 0, c(f ′^ − g′) = ψ.

Solving this we obtain the second solution

u 2 (x, t) =

2 c

∫ (^) x+ct

x−ct

ψ(y)dy, (6)

corresponding to zero initial position. Thus the complete solution u of the initial value problem (1), (4) is given by

u(x, t) = u 1 (x, t) + u 2 (x, t) =

(φ(x + ct) + φ(x − ct)) +

2 c

∫ (^) x+ct

x−ct

ψ(y)dy.

Why this extension is works? The even extension of a smooth function with φ(0) = 0 will in general be non smooth at 0. But the main point is that every odd 2 L-periodic function is zero at the points 0 and L! So if u(x, t) remains odd and 2L-periodic with respect to x at all times t, then the boundary condition will be automatically satisfied. Check that if φ is continuous and differentiable on [0, L], and satisfies (9), then the proposed odd 2L periodic extension will be also continuous and differentiable. Suppose now that φ is an odd 2L periodic function on the whole real line, and consider the function u defined by (5). It is also an odd 2L-periodic function of x for each fixed t That it is 2L periodic is evident. To check that it is odd we write

u(−x, t) = (1/2) (φ(−x + ct) + φ(−x − ct)) = −(1/2) (φ(x + ct) + φ(x − ct)) = −u(x, t),

where we used that φ is odd. Now it remains to notice that any odd 2L-periodic function f satisfies f (0) = 0 and f (L) = 0.

Thus we obtain a unique solution of (1) on [0, L] with boundary condition (7) and initial condition (9): it is given by formula (5) where φ is the odd 2 L-periodic extension of the initial shape.

It is very instructive to look what really happens in a series of pictures showing the shape of the string at various moments. Let us take some very simple initial shape φ, say constant on a small interval near L/4 and zero outside a slightly bigger interval. I urge you to make few pictures!

Initially, for small times t, the original shape splits into two equal halves, and they start moving at speed c into opposite directions. But look carefully what happens when the bump reaches the left end x = 0. Since we made an odd 2L-periodic extension, a similar negative bump comes to 0 from the negative side. In the next moments, these two bumps interfere and eventually may cancel each other, so at some moment the solution is zero near the end x = 0. And in the next moments the negative bump re-appears at the left end

of the string and moves to the right. This is called “reflection of the wave” at the end. Same thing happens a bit later on the right end. Eventually the two negative reflected bumps will collide near the place where we had a positive bump at t = 0. Then they pass each other and this motion continues indefinitely.

Example. Suppose that c = 1 in (1), and we are solving (1) on the interval [− 1 , 1] with the boundary conditions

u(− 1 , t) = u(1, t) = 0

and the initial conditions are

u(x, 0) = φ :=

{ 1 − |x|, |x| < 1 , 0 , |x| ≥ 1 ,

and ut(x, t) = 0. Find u(0, 2021) and u(0, 2020).

Solution. By d’Alembert’s formula, u(x, t) = ( φ˜(x + t) + φ˜(x − t))/2, where φ˜ is the 2-periodic extension of φ. So

u(0, 2021) = ( φ˜(−2021) + φ˜(2021))/2 = (φ(1) + φ(−1))/2 = 0.

and similarly u(0, 2020) = 1.

Remarks. d’Alembert’s formula explains why we can communicate using light or sound. Suppose that at the time t = 0 at the place x = 0 someone makes a click. We describe this click by some function φ(x) which is localized near x = 0: φ(x) = 0 for |x| > , where  is a small number, like in the previous example. If you are sitting at some point x = A > 0, first you hear nothing. But at the time t = A/c the wave φ(x − ct) moving with speed c to the right reaches you and passes. So you hear a click. It is important that the click arrives to the point A at time A/c undistorted. It is just 2-ce smaller that the original click. So you can hear the original click, only with a time delay. Similarly if we are talking about electromagnetic waves, you can see a flash as a flash. A localized signal (a flash) arrives to your place with the speed of light undistorted. All this applies to one space dimension while we are living in three di- mensions. It turns out that in dimension 3 there is a formula for the solution