Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Criminal Procedure GPSTC 320-321 Questions And Answers 2024-2025, Exams of Law

Criminal Procedure GPSTC 320-321 Questions And Answers 2024-2025 probable cause - ANS-✔✔*facts or circumstances* that would make a reasonable or prudent *person* believe a crime is being or has been committed. Probable cause to search v probably cause to arrest - ANS-✔✔Two types of probable cause An arrest without probable cause is - ANS-✔✔illegal PC is the basis for - ANS-✔✔a *legal* search or a *legal* arrest The Exclusionary Rule definition - ANS-✔✔A rule that provides that otherwise admissible evidence cannot be used in a criminal trial if it was the result of illegal police conduct ex: illegally searching someone and finding contraband does not allow that evidence to be used in court Evidence seized in violation of due process or some provision of ___________ (based on exclusionary rule) - ANS-✔

Typology: Exams

2024/2025

Available from 10/14/2024

passlist-passlist
passlist-passlist 🇺🇸

5

(3)

2.1K documents

1 / 26

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a

Partial preview of the text

Download Criminal Procedure GPSTC 320-321 Questions And Answers 2024-2025 and more Exams Law in PDF only on Docsity!

probable cause - ANS-¥ / *facts or circumstances* that would make a reasonable or prudent *person* believe a crime is being or has been committed. Probable cause to search v probably cause to arrest - ANS- “Two types of probable cause An arrest without probable cause is - ANS-¥ v illegal PCis the basis for - ANS-V Wa *legal* search or a *legal* arrest The Exclusionary Rule definition - ANS-¥ WA rule that provides that otherwise admissible evidence cannot be used in a criminal trial if it was the result of illegal police conduct ex: illegally searching someone and finding contraband does not allow that evidence to be used in court Evidence seized in violation of due process or some provision of (based on exclusionary rule) - ANS-V “ the Bill of Rights Weeks v. US - ANS-V / Case law that established exclusionary rule, evidence gotten without a warrant isn't admissible in a *federal court* Lottery tickets were seized from a home without a SW Wolfe v. Colorado (1949) - ANS-Y Y FEDS would go to *local* officers and make them obtain evidence because the exclusionary rule did not apply to local and state officers also known as *Silver Platter Doctrine* - was ultimately struck down