Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Cosmological Arguments: Aquinas and Leibniz on the Existence of God, Summaries of Philosophy

Two cosmological arguments for the existence of god: aquinas' argument from efficient causes and leibniz's argument from sufficient reason. Aquinas argues that there must be a first efficient cause, while leibniz suggests that the entire series of dependent beings requires a self-existent cause, or god.

What you will learn

  • What is Aquinas' argument from efficient causes for the existence of God?
  • How do these arguments differ in their approach to explaining the cause of the universe?
  • What is Leibniz's argument from sufficient reason for the existence of God?

Typology: Summaries

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

journalyyy
journalyyy 🇬🇧

4.7

(12)

215 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Cosmological Arguments Ted Sider
Intro Philosophy
Basic idea: there has to be a reason or cause for everything, and this is God.
1. Aquinas’s cosmological argument
Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274): “There are five ways in which one can prove
that there is a God.”
The second way is from the nature of efficient causes. For we find in
observable things that there is an order of efficient causes. Nevertheless,
we do not find—nor is it possible—that something is the efficient cause
of itself; for then a thing would be prior to itself, which is impossible.
However, it is not possible that efficient causes go on to infinity. This
is because in any order of efficient causes, the first is the cause of the
intermediate, and the intermediate is the cause of the last, whether the
intermediate cause consists of many or only one. Now if the cause is
removed, the effect is removed. Therefore, if there were no first efficient
cause, there would not be any final or intermediate ones. But if the series
of efficient causes should proceed to infinity, there would not be a first
efficient cause, and so there would not be a final effect, nor intermediary
efficient causes, which is clearly false. Therefore, it is necessary to posit
some first efficient cause, which everyone calls God. (Aquinas, p. 48.)
2. Representing the argument in numbered-premise format
1. Formulate the argument
2. Give the justifications of the premises
3. Evaluate the argument
Step 1: formulating the argument
Aquinas’s cosmological argument
1. Some objects are caused by others
1
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Cosmological Arguments: Aquinas and Leibniz on the Existence of God and more Summaries Philosophy in PDF only on Docsity!

Cosmological Arguments Intro PhilosophyTed Sider

Basic idea: there has to be a reason or cause for everything, and this is God.

1. Aquinas’s cosmological argument

Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274): “There are five ways in which one can prove that there is a God.”

The second way is from the nature of efficient causes. For we find in observable things that there is an order of efficient causes. Nevertheless, we do not find—nor is it possible—that something is the efficient cause of itself; for then a thing would be prior to itself, which is impossible. However, it is not possible that efficient causes go on to infinity. This is because in any order of efficient causes, the first is the cause of the intermediate, and the intermediate is the cause of the last, whether the intermediate cause consists of many or only one. Now if the cause is removed, the effect is removed. Therefore, if there were no first efficient cause, there would not be any final or intermediate ones. But if the series of efficient causes should proceed to infinity, there would not be a first efficient cause, and so there would not be a final effect, nor intermediary efficient causes, which is clearly false. Therefore, it is necessary to posit some first efficient cause, which everyone calls God. (Aquinas, p. 48.)

2. Representing the argument in numbered-premise format

  1. Formulate the argument
  2. Give the justifications of the premises
  3. Evaluate the argument

Step 1: formulating the argument

Aquinas’s cosmological argument

  1. Some objects are caused by others
  1. Any object that is caused by another lies at the end of a causal series, in which the first member has no cause
  2. Any uncaused first member of a causal series would be God
  3. Therefore, God exists

Causal series: A series of objects in which each object causes the next

Step 2: justifying the premises

Premise 1: we know this from observation.

Premise 2: Let’s trace the causes of a forest fire (say), back as far as we can:

spark fire

How will this process end? With a self-caused thing?:

spark fire

…we never observe, nor ever could, something causing itself, for this would mean it preceded itself, and this is not possible. (Aquinas, p. 48)

Could it go back forever?:

spark fire

However, it is not possible that efficient causes go on to infinity. This is because in any order of efficient causes, the first is the cause of the intermediate, and the intermediate is the cause of the last, whether the intermediate cause consists of many or only one. Now if the cause is removed, the effect is removed. Therefore, if there were no first efficient cause, there would not be any final or intermediate ones. But if the series of efficient causes should proceed to infinity, there would not be a first efficient cause, and so there would not be a final effect, nor intermediary efficient causes, which is clearly false. (Aquinas, p. 48)

Clark’s argument

  1. The aggregate of all dependent things is not self-existent
  2. If the aggregate of all dependent things is not self-existent, it must depend on God
  3. Therefore God exists

Justification of 1: a self-existent thing can’t be made of dependent parts

Justification of 2: the PSR implies that the aggregate must depend on some- thing; and that something would need to be very powerful.

Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) Anything that isn’t self-existent de- pends on something

Advantages over original argument:

  • Evades the problem that the causes could go back forever
  • PSR can be used to rebut the big bang objection

But one can object to the PSR: all explanations end somewhere; why not stop with the whole material world, rather than with God?