Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Tax Liability of Mr. Green and Rules for 'Own Estimate' in Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, Exams of Business Taxation and Tax Management

The legality of a tax notice issued to mr. Green regarding his shares in abc (private) limited and the rules for 'own estimate' in relation to quarterly advance tax payments under the income tax ordinance, 2001. It also covers transactions involving a pakistani citizen and a foreign company, and the impact on taxation for the year 2007.

Typology: Exams

2011/2012

Uploaded on 08/27/2012

dharmanand
dharmanand 🇮🇳

3.3

(3)

61 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
ADVANCED TAXATION (MARKS 100)
(3 hours)
Q.1 (a) Mr. Green held 25% shares of ABC (Private) Limited at the time of its winding
up on June 30, 2005. He has now received a notice from the Commissioner of
Income Tax requiring him to pay Rs 500,000 on account of tax payable by the
Company for the tax year 2005.
Discuss the legality of the notice issued to Mr. Green and the extent of his
liability, if any.
(05)
(b) Discuss the rules relating to “own estimate” with reference to quarterly payment
of advance tax under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001.
(04)
Q.2 (a) Red, Blue & Co. has recently started business as Construction Contractors.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, they have undertaken the following
transactions:
(i) They entered into a contract for construction of a housing scheme with
Mr. Ghalib, a Pakistani citizen. The project is likely to take three years to
complete. Upto December 31, 2006 payments aggregating to Rs 10,000,000
were received from Mr. Ghalib. No tax has been deducted from these
payments.
(ii) The firm was also awarded a contract by XYZ (Private) Limited for
construction of residential quarters for its factory workers. The work shall
commence from January 15, 2007 and will be completed within six months.
However, a mobilization advance amounting to Rs 1,000,000 was paid by
XYZ (Private) Limited in December 2006, after deducting tax of Rs 60,000.
The firm’s partners are not very sure about the impact of the above transactions
on the firm’s taxation for tax year 2007. They are of the view that:
Payments received from Mr. Ghalib should have been subjected to final tax.
However, as he has not deducted the tax, they want to discharge the tax
liability on their own.
Work on contract with XYZ (Private) Limited has not commenced upto
December 31, 2006 and therefore, the advance received is not taxable. The
tax deducted should, therefore, be claimed as refundable.
Required:
Explain to the partners, the basis of taxation of the above payments received by
the firm.
(06)
(b) Under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, every importer is required to pay tax on
the value of goods at the prescribed rates. State the conditions under which a
manufacturer can obtain exemption certificate from the Commissioner of Income
Tax, with regard to payment of tax at the import stage.
(04)
docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Tax Liability of Mr. Green and Rules for 'Own Estimate' in Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 and more Exams Business Taxation and Tax Management in PDF only on Docsity!

ADVANCED TAXATION (MARKS 100)

(3 hours)

Q.1 (a) Mr. Green held 25% shares of ABC (Private) Limited at the time of its winding up on June 30, 2005. He has now received a notice from the Commissioner of Income Tax requiring him to pay Rs 500,000 on account of tax payable by the Company for the tax year 2005.

Discuss the legality of the notice issued to Mr. Green and the extent of his liability, if any. (05)

(b) Discuss the rules relating to “own estimate” with reference to quarterly payment of advance tax under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. (04)

Q.2 (a) Red, Blue & Co. has recently started business as Construction Contractors. During the year ended December 31, 2006, they have undertaken the following transactions:

(i) They entered into a contract for construction of a housing scheme with Mr. Ghalib, a Pakistani citizen. The project is likely to take three years to complete. Upto December 31, 2006 payments aggregating to Rs 10,000, were received from Mr. Ghalib. No tax has been deducted from these payments.

(ii) The firm was also awarded a contract by XYZ (Private) Limited for construction of residential quarters for its factory workers. The work shall commence from January 15, 2007 and will be completed within six months. However, a mobilization advance amounting to Rs 1,000,000 was paid by XYZ (Private) Limited in December 2006, after deducting tax of Rs 60,000.

The firm’s partners are not very sure about the impact of the above transactions on the firm’s taxation for tax year 2007. They are of the view that:

− Payments received from Mr. Ghalib should have been subjected to final tax. However, as he has not deducted the tax, they want to discharge the tax liability on their own. − Work on contract with XYZ (Private) Limited has not commenced upto December 31, 2006 and therefore, the advance received is not taxable. The tax deducted should, therefore, be claimed as refundable.

Required: Explain to the partners, the basis of taxation of the above payments received by the firm. (06)

(b) Under the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001, every importer is required to pay tax on the value of goods at the prescribed rates. State the conditions under which a manufacturer can obtain exemption certificate from the Commissioner of Income Tax, with regard to payment of tax at the import stage. (04)

Q.3 MNO Pakistan Limited is a public limited company whose shares are listed on all the registered stock exchanges in Pakistan and remained so listed during the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company is involved in the following activities:

− Supply of telecommunication equipment. The equipments are assembled in Pakistan after importing the major components from EU countries. − Providing consultancy services in Pakistan to companies operating in the telecommunication sector.

The Tax Manager of the Company has computed the taxable income for the Tax Year 2007, as under: Note

Rupees in “000”

Profit before tax as per Profit & Loss Account 100,

Add: Accounting depreciation 20, Accounting amortization (i) 6, Excess cost of perquisites to employees 1, Provision for bad debts 2, Profit on debt to a foreign bank (ii) 5, Tax gain on disposal of fixed assets (iii) 5, 39,

Less: Tax depreciation - initial (iv) 5,

  • normal 10, Deferred expenditure (v) 1, Accounting gain on disposal of fixed assets (iii) 7, Bad debts actually written off (vi) 1, 24, Less: Income attributable to services’ revenue subject to Final Tax Regime (vii) 15, Taxable income for the year 99,

Notes to the Computation: (i) On December 29, 2006, the Company has acquired rights for use of trade mark owned by a US company for a period of three years. The trade mark will be used for the equipments to be sold after March 31, 2007. For accounting purposes, the cost is being amortized equally over the three-year period.

(ii) The Company obtained a working capital loan from a foreign bank, the proceeds of which were utilized during the year. The Company did not deduct tax while paying interest on the loan. The Company is of the view that interest is not taxable in Pakistan as the bank does not have a Permanent Establishment in Pakistan.

(iii) Tax gains on disposal of fixed assets include a tax profit of Rs 60,000 on the sale of a car. It was acquired during the year ended December 31, 2004 at a cost of Rs 1,500,000. However, for the purpose of tax depreciation, the value was restricted at Rs 1,000,000. As a policy, the car was sold to the Managing Director of the Company for Rs 200,000. Tax gain represents the difference between fair market value i.e. Rs 700,000 and the tax written down value i.e. Rs 640,000.

(iv) During the year, the Company acquired second hand equipment at a cost of Rs 8,000,000. The Company is of the view that since the equipment was not used by the Company itself, it is entitled to claim initial depreciation allowance.

(v) The Company incurred an expenditure of Rs 2,000,000 on sales promotion. It has been estimated that the benefit of such expenditure will extend to three years and, therefore, the same is being amortized over a period of three years. However, for tax purposes, the whole of the expenditure has been claimed.

Q.5 (a) To receive and retain recognition, a provident fund has to satisfy various conditions mentioned in the Sixth Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001. Based on these conditions, comment on the legality of each of the following:

(i) The recognition can also be granted by the Commissioner of Income Tax to an employer whose principal place of business is not in Pakistan. (ii) Employer does not have the power to recover any sum whatsoever from the employees’ provident fund balance, under any circumstances. (04)

(b) During the tax year 2006 and 2007, a local bank provided various types of consumer loan facilities to its customers. Details of interest earned on consumer loans and bad debts provided against consumer loans are as follows:

2006 2007 Rupees in million Interest earned on consumer loans Bad debt provision for the year

Required: Compute the allowable bad debt provision on consumer loans in accordance with the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 for tax years 2006 and 2007. (^) (06)

Q.6 (a) DEF Limited supplied goods valuing Rs 1,000,000 to one of its distributor, Mr. Pink who is also registered for sales tax purposes. Sales tax invoice was issued for the said amount plus sales tax of Rs 150,000. The transaction was recorded in the monthly sales tax return for the month of January 2007.

In February 2007 the internal auditor of the Company observed that the accountant had applied incorrect selling prices. As a result, the Company will have to refund the excess amount to Mr. Pink.

Required: Advise the procedure to be adopted by the Company and the distributor to adjust the excess amount of sales tax. (05)

(b) Mr. Lal, an unregistered person, is engaged in the supply of imported and locally purchased good. He has received a notice from a local registration office of the sales tax for compulsory registration.

Before submitting the application for registration, he wants to know whether he will be able to claim the input tax paid on the unsold stocks purchased before registration.

Required: Explain the legal provisions of the Sales Tax Act, 1990 regarding tax paid on stocks before registration. (06)

Q.7 GHI Limited has been engaged in the import and supply of taxable goods which are listed in the Third Schedule to the Sales Tax Act, 1990. You have been provided the following quarterly information relating to the company’s operations:

Rupees in million July–Sept 2006

Oct–Dec 2006

Jan–Mar 2007 Sales 35.00 28.00 26. Value of goods imported determined under section 25 of the Customs Act, 1969 20.00 22.00 19. Closing Stock 4.00 5.00 3.

Following additional information is available:

(i) There was no opening stock as at July 1, 2006; (ii) Custom duty is payable at the rate of 20%; (iii) Minimum value addition on the goods is prescribed at 15% of import value; (iv) Retail price of goods sold in first, second and third quarter amounted to Rs 45 million, Rs 37 million and Rs 32 million respectively.

Required: (a) Compute the sales tax payable, if any, in respect of each of the three quarters; (b) Work out the amount of input tax, foregone by the commercial importer, if any, in each of the three quarters. (17)

Q.8 (a) Explain the basis of determination of Federal Excise Duty in each of the following cases: (i) Services provided free of charge; and (ii) Goods liable to duty at a rate dependent on their value. (06)

(b) Explain the term “Franchise” and “Franchiser”. (03)

(THE END)