Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Assessing Govt. Interventions to Stabilize Commodity Prices & Enhance UK Trade Balance, Study notes of Economics

The case for and against government intervention to stabilize commodity prices, specifically copper, through buffer stock schemes. It also explores policies to improve the uk balance of trade in goods and services, including reducing import spending, influencing exchange rates, and implementing supply side policies.

What you will learn

  • How can the UK improve its balance of trade in goods and services?
  • What are the potential drawbacks of government policies to reduce import spending and improve the UK balance of trade?
  • What are the arguments for and against government intervention to stabilize copper prices through a buffer stock scheme?

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

jeena
jeena 🇬🇧

4.2

(6)

215 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
P
Target Price
Q
D
TP
P1
Q1 Q2
1. Evaluate the case for and against governments intervening to try to
stabilise the price of copper, for example, through setting up a buffer
stock scheme.
The price of copper can be volatile for various reasons. Firstly, in the short
term, the supply of copper is inelastic. Demand can change rapidly due to
speculation causing prices to rise or fall rapidly. A buffer stock scheme is a
government policy which aims to stabilise prices and therefore benefit both
consumers and producers from excess volatility in the price.
For example, if there was an unexpected increase in supply or a fall in
demand, the government could intervene to buy the excess supply and keep
prices high. If the government allowed prices to fall, then some producers
would go out of business. It is not desirable to allow firms to go out of
business because of falling prices. It would lead to unemployment and could
lead to a shortage of supply in future years.
Diagram of Buffer Stock
To maintain price at TP the government buy Q1 to Q2 * TP
Similarly, if prices increase significantly, then consumers will be faced with
higher prices, therefore, there will be a decline in consumer surplus. Also
copper is an important raw material for electric wiring. If the price of copper
increases firms would be faced with unexpected costs which can cause
problems and decrease confidence to invest. If the government bought
copper, when prices were falling they could increase supply when prices are
rising. This greater stability of prices would be beneficial for both producers
and consumers.
However, governments tend to be more concerned about falling prices. Falling
prices could cause producers to go out of business leading to unemployment.
S2
S1
Buffer Stock
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Assessing Govt. Interventions to Stabilize Commodity Prices & Enhance UK Trade Balance and more Study notes Economics in PDF only on Docsity!

P Target Price Q D TP P Q1 Q

1. Evaluate the case for and against governments intervening to try to stabilise the price of copper, for example, through setting up a buffer stock scheme. The price of copper can be volatile for various reasons. Firstly, in the short term, the supply of copper is inelastic. Demand can change rapidly due to speculation causing prices to rise or fall rapidly. A buffer stock scheme is a government policy which aims to stabilise prices and therefore benefit both consumers and producers from excess volatility in the price. For example, if there was an unexpected increase in supply or a fall in demand, the government could intervene to buy the excess supply and keep prices high. If the government allowed prices to fall, then some producers would go out of business. It is not desirable to allow firms to go out of business because of falling prices. It would lead to unemployment and could lead to a shortage of supply in future years. Diagram of Buffer Stock To maintain price at TP the government buy Q1 to Q2 * TP Similarly, if prices increase significantly, then consumers will be faced with higher prices, therefore, there will be a decline in consumer surplus. Also copper is an important raw material for electric wiring. If the price of copper increases firms would be faced with unexpected costs which can cause problems and decrease confidence to invest. If the government bought copper, when prices were falling they could increase supply when prices are rising. This greater stability of prices would be beneficial for both producers and consumers. However, governments tend to be more concerned about falling prices. Falling prices could cause producers to go out of business leading to unemployment. S

Buffer Stock^ S

Rising prices create some discomfort for consumers, but it is not as damaging. Though, if the product was a basic food necessity like rice, it may become important to prevent price rises However, there are problems with implementing buffer stocks. Firstly, it can be difficult for a government to set up a buffer stock scheme for a commodity produced in many countries. For example, several countries may try to prevent prices falling, but, one or two countries may continue to increase supply benefiting from higher prices. Therefore, if not all countries take part in the buffer stock scheme, the price will remain low. The difficulty of stabilising prices of commodities can be seen by the failure of OPEC to stabilise oil prices. Buffer stocks can be expensive to implement. The government will need to buy excess supply and there is no guarantee they will be able to sell for a profit; especially if government intervention encourages more firms to enter the market. Buffer stocks may distort market incentives. For example, if prices fall this may be an indication of oversupply in the market. By buying this supply, it may encourage oversupply even more. Therefore, it doesn't address the fundamental problem in the industry. Also government intervention may encourage the firms to be inefficient because they can rely on the government intervention to boost supply. Finally, the government may have poor information about future prices and supply; therefore, they may end up buying too much or too little. In conclusion, a buffer stock scheme is fine in practice, but is often much more difficult to practically implement. Also, for a commodity like copper, it requires international co-operation, which is unlikely to exist.

1. Evaluate government policies which might improve the UK balance of trade in goods and services The balance of trade in goods and services measures the value of exports minus the value of imports. An improvement in the balance of trade in goods and services requires the value of exports to increase faster than the value of imports, and therefore reduce the trade deficit. The first policy is to reduce import spending. This can be done through contractionary fiscal policy. Higher tax rates and lower government spending should reduce consumers’ disposable income. Therefore, there will be a fall in spending on imports of goods and services. In the UK, we have a high propensity to import, therefore any increase in taxes (e.g. higher income tax rates) might be effective in reducing

spending through contractionary fiscal policy. Reducing consumer spending through higher taxes, will reduce imports. However, this policy also has the biggest drawback of leading to lower economic growth and higher unemployment. The best policy would be effective supply side policies, such as education, more flexible labour markets and increased competitiveness - which should help make UK exports more attractive. This will improve the balance of trade over time. The drawback to this supply side approach is that, in practice, it is not so easy for the government to improve the productivity of UK industry through supply side policies.