Barbara Coloroso
Win-Win with consequences; bullying. Punishment v. consequences
Anna Kreisheimer, Elaine Segner,
Kandace Jilek, Amy Foote
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Guidelines and tips
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
University Rankings
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Our save-the-student-ebooks!
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Barbara Coloroso: Win-Win with Consequences - Bullying and Inner Discipline, Slides of Behavioural Science
Barbara Coloroso is an internationally recognized author and speaker with a background in sociology, special education, philosophy, and experience as a classroom teacher, university instructor, and volunteer. In this document, she discusses her approach to bullying, inner discipline, and the difference between punishment and consequences. She emphasizes the importance of teaching responsibility, setting high standards, and providing a structured yet flexible learning environment.
What you will learn
- What is Barbara Coloroso's approach to bullying?
- How can teachers help prevent bullying?
- What role do bystanders play in bullying situations according to Coloroso?
- How does Coloroso differentiate between punishment and consequences?
- What are the three types of families according to Coloroso?
Typology: Slides
2021/2022
1 / 42
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Related documents
Partial preview of the text
Download Barbara Coloroso: Win-Win with Consequences - Bullying and Inner Discipline and more Slides Behavioural Science in PDF only on Docsity!
Barbara Coloroso
Win-Win with consequences; bullying. Punishment v. consequences
Anna Kreisheimer, Elaine Segner, Kandace Jilek, Amy Foote
Hero in the Hallway
Professional Background
- Multiple years of training in
- Sociology
- Special Education
- Philosophy
Professional Background
- Field experience in
- Classroom teacher
- Laboratory school instructor
- University instructor
- Seminar leader
- Volunteer in Rwanda
- Mother of her own 3 children
Fundamental
- Win-win with consequences; bullying,
punishment v. consequences
- How both parties can benefit from a consequence, how bullying can be prevented and how there is a difference between punishment and a consequence
Key Points
- Inner discipline
- Bullying
- Discipline vs. punishment
- 3 types of families: Jellyfish,
Brick-wall and Backbone
- No rewards
Inner Discipline
- Their good behavior is their reward
- Teaches problem solving
- Gives them a feeling of self-worth
Responsible Students
- Acts out of conviction
- Stands up for values
- Doesn’t wait for adult approval
- Accepts consequences
- Willing to take risks
- Everything doesn’t have to have a purpose
Sticker Praise
- Child becomes dependent on praise
- Child concerned more about pleasing
- No energy left to develop inner self
- Sets up competition among children
- Exaggerates accomplishments
Brick Wall
- Controlled environment
- Punctual, clean, and orderly
- Strict rules
- Rigid enforcement of rules
- Threats and bribes
- Use of humiliation
Backbone Classroom
- Set up behavior rules in beginning
- Be consistent
- Follow through
- Have structure with some flexibility
Bullying
- Teachers need to be aware
- Help to prevent
- Protect students
- Teach students about negative affects
Teacher’s Role
- In regards to bullying:
Sit down and talk with bully Hold bully accountable Discipline not punishment Redirect bullies energy in community service Nurture children with love
Teacher’s Role
- Give children opportunities to: ▫ Make decisions ▫ Take responsibility for actions ▫ Learn from choices
- Guide students rather than rescuing from decisions