Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Research on the Impact of CDA Training on Teacher Characteristics and Beliefs, Study notes of Human Development

Insights from a series of studies conducted over four years at Pennsylvania State University on the effects of CDA (Child Development Associate) training on various teacher characteristics and beliefs. The research focuses on areas such as self-concept, self-confidence, educational aspirations, professional involvement, child development knowledge, early childhood methods, CDA behaviors, cognitive flexibility, and teacher beliefs. Results indicate that CDA trainees gain specific knowledge, demonstrate increased self-confidence, and adopt more child-centered, cognitive beliefs.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

sctsh3
sctsh3 🇬🇧

4.8

(6)

296 documents

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
DOCUMENT R71.1SUME
ED 253 314 PS 014 844
AUTHOR Peters, Donald L.
TITLE What Does Research Tell Us About CDA Training?
PUB DATE Nov 84
NOTE 12p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
National Association for the Education of Young
Children (Los Angeles, CA, November 8-11, 1984).
PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143, --
Speeches /Conference Papers (.150)
EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage.
DESCRIPTORS *Child Caregivers; *Competency Based Teacher
Education; Early Childhood Education; *Outcomes of
Education; Postsecondary Education; *Preschool
Teachers; Program Effectiveness; *Teacher
Characteristics; *Teacher Effectiveness; Teaching
Skills; Training
IDENTIFIERS *CDA; Child Development Associate
ABSTRACT Research concerning the Child Development Associate
(CDA) program at the Pennsylvania State University aims to define
more carefully the characteristics of the adult learners enrolled in
CDA training, delineate the characteristics and process of training,
and broaden the scope of outcome variables studied. To address this
third aim, a series of studies conducted over a period of 4 years has
focused on the effects of training on a range of teacher
characteristics; teacher beliefs, dogmatism, locus of control,
self-concept, self-confidence, educational aspirations, professional
involvement, child development knowledge, early childhood methods,
CDA behaviors, and cognitive flexibility. Results of these six
studies show that (1) CDA trainees gain specific knowledge of child
development and early childhood methods; (2) trainee educational
aspirations appear to be raised by participation; (3) trainees are
more actively involved professionally and seek professional growth;
(4) trainees demonstrate increased self-confidence, and (5)
cognitively oriented, child-centered beliefs increase during the
first year of participation and slightly decrease during the second
year. It is suggested that slight differences in percentages between
these results and those of national CDA surveys indicate that
training may be enhanced by the actual assessment and credentialing
process or by the subsequent recognition credentialeJ CDA's attain.
(AS)
***********************************************************************
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made
from the original document.
*************************************************************.c*********
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Research on the Impact of CDA Training on Teacher Characteristics and Beliefs and more Study notes Human Development in PDF only on Docsity!

DOCUMENT R71.1SUME ED 253 314 PS 014 844 AUTHORTITLE WhatPeters, Does Donald Research L. Tell Us About CDA Training? PUB NOTE DATE Nov 12p.; (^84) Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for the Education of Young PUB TYPE ChildrenReports - (Los Research/Technical^ Angeles,^ CA,^ November (143, --8-11,^ 1984). Speeches /Conference Papers (.150) EDRSDESCRIPTORS PRICE MF01/PC01 *Child Caregivers; Plus Postage. *Competency Based Teacher Education; Education; EarlyPostsecondary Childhood Education; Education; *Preschool *Outcomes of Teachers; Characteristics; Program *TeacherEffectiveness; Effectiveness; Teacher Teaching IDENTIFIERS Skills;CDA; Child^ Training Development Associate ABSTRACT Research concerning the Child Development Associate

more^ (CDA) carefully^ program^ atthe^ the characteristics^ Pennsylvania^ Stateof the^ University adult learners^ aims^ to enrolled^ define in CDA and training,broaden the delineate scope of the outcome characteristics variables studied.and process To addressof training, this third focused aim, on athe series effects of ofstudies training conducted on a range over ofa periodteacher of 4 years has characteristics;self-concept, self-confidence, teacher beliefs, educational dogmatism, aspirations, locus of control, professional CDAinvolvement, behaviors,^ child and^ developmentcognitive flexibility.^ knowledge,^ earlyResults^ childhood of these^ methods, six development^ studies^ show andthat early^ (1)^ CDAchildhood^ trainees methods;^ gain^ specific (2) trainee^ knowledge educational^ of^ child moreaspirations actively^ appear involved^ to^ beprofessionally^ raised^ by^ participation; and seek professional^ (3)^ trainees growth;^ are cognitively(4)^ trainees oriented,^ demonstrate child-centered^ increased^ self-confidence, beliefs increase^ and during^ (5) the year.^ first Ityear is^ ofsuggested^ participation that slightand^ slightly differences^ decrease in percentagesduring^ the^ secondbetween these training results may beand enhanced those of by national the actual CDA assessmentsurveys indicate and credentialing that process (AS) or by the subsequent recognition credentialeJ CDA's attain.

Reproductions supplied from theby EDRSoriginal are document.the best that can be made *************************************************************.c*********

What Does Research Tell. Us About CDA Training? NATIONALINSTITUTEOFEDUCATION^ U.S.DEPARTMENTOFEDUCATION

.^ EDUCATIONALRESOURCESINFORMATION^ CENTERIERIC) Donald L. Peters )f,,Thisdocumenthasbeenreproducedas receivedfromthepersonororganization The Pennsylvania State University ;^ originatingrt.Minorchangeshavebeenmadetoimprove reproductionquality. Pointsofvieworopinionsstatedinthisdocu- mentdonotnecessarilyrepres,fitofficialNIE positionorpolicy. The Child Development Associate (CDA) program embodies many innovative concepts for training as wP11 as fOr the assessment and credentialing of early childhood personnel. Indeed, assessing the impact o-F the CDA "process" on the individuals involved, it is often-difficult to separate out the effects of the formal assessment .and credentialing procedures from those of the training that brought the person to "readiness," and both -from the selection factors that brought the individuals into the program in the first place. It is to the effects of training that this report is directed. Few studies are available that address either the perbcess or outcomes of CDA training. CDA training is going on in some form

throughout the United Sttes. Over 300 institutions of higher.'

education are now,. or have been, providers of training. The wrfAH federal government early on provided funds +or- the development of

re

a variety of training models, and, even within a single institution programs may differ in systematic ways. It seems strange then that so little is known and documented about the CDA training process.

",^ Even^ stranger^ is^ the^ lack^ of^ solid^ data^ about^ the^ effects^ of-

:4r4A4 CDA training on the individuals involved. The -few published studies have focused upon such variables as the success of "PERMISSIONTOREPRODUCETHIS MATERIALHASBEENGRANTEDBY 00\r"sek..\4 L.k--)tiRi-s TOTHEEDUCATIONALRESOURCESINFORMATIONCENTER(ERIC)."

What Does Research Tell

analysis of Head Start, CDA, and a wide range of other early childhood -education materials suggests a broader set of teacher characteristics ti-at "excellent" early childhood teachers 41ould

have.'" The include: flexibilityl^ the^ ability^ to^ adapt^ to^ the

needs of individual children and parents, self-directedness, the understanding and adoption of a consistent belief systscm about children's learning and development, a child-centered approach toward teaching, a positive self-image as a person and as a teacher-, and a sense of professionalism and professional grdwth. The teacher demonstrating these characteristics is likely to be successful in ALL situations. In a series of studies conducted over the last four years, we have sought to determine the effects of training on this^ range of teacher characteristics. We^ have^ attempted^ to^ design^ studies with Gufficient control to allow reasonable.attribution to the effects 04: training over and above such other factors as self-selection. The^ vast^ majority^ of^ our^ data^ have^ been collacted prior to CDA assessment and credentitling. Lt^ me briefly summarize our findings to date. Summary of Results Table 1 summarizes^ the^ result^ of^ six^ studies.^ In^ essence, our data show that

  1. CDA^ trainees^ gain^ specific^ knowledge^ of^ child deveiopment and early childhood methods and that such knowledge is reflected in classroom behavi or. These^ results^ are^ manifest on paper-and-pencil assessments (Llewellyn, 1983 Prudhoe,^ 1983), through classroom observations (Prudhoe, 1983) ,and^ through

Study Sample

Table 1 .Summary of Study Samples and Results

CDA Variables Programs

What Does. Research Tel! Us

Results.

Peters & Sutton N=5 CDA t ress) N=44^ Undergraduates

(^7) DogmatismTeacher beliefs Locus of control Self-concept Self-confidence Educational aspirations

Suttqp & Peters N=9 CDA 3 Teacher^ beliefs (Longitudinal^ (Note^ 1)- replication)

Peters (1984) N=108 N=70 HeadCDA^ Start control 18 Self-confidenceTeacher^ beliefs ProfessionalEducational^ aspirationsinvdl ment,

Llewellyn (1983) N=

Prudhoe (1983) N=8 N=8^ TraditionalCDA only N=8 CDA & traditional

*.

beliefs.^ Increased^ child-centered,^ cognitive Increased educational aspira- tions. Increased self-confidence, Improved performance ir. several^ areas of No classroomsignificant performance. differences in CDA's or Undugraduates in beliefs, dogmatise, locus of control, or self-concept..

Increased child-centered, cognitive beliefs.

CDA's more than control involved in CH's^ educational more than^ activities. control professionally CDA's^ involved, stronger than control in child- centered, cognitive beliefs, A

ra

1 Child Early^ developmentchildhood methods and^ knowledge^ Increased early^ educationknowledge methods.of^ child^ development

Child development knowledge Increased knowledge and improved class- ! CDA behaviors room functional^ competence areas.^ in^ some,^ but^ not^ all, CDA and traditional significantly better.

Sutton (1983) 13 TeacherCognitive^ beliefs flexibility 5

Teachertion, to beliefs closeness related of supervision, to routiniza- and to and complexitthings* of^ work^ with^ people,^ data,

What Does Research Tell.

  1. CDA^ trainees^ have^ increased^ self-confidence^ as^ teachers based upon self -- reports (Peters, 1984; Peters & Sutton, in press). However,^ when^ lookea^ against^ the^ Head^ Start^ control

group and across time in.traning, an interesting picture

emerges. ,It appears that entry in the CDA program initially depresses self-confidence (X = 24.1, one month into the program, as.compared to controls, X = 25.3, and second-year trainees, X = 26.1), but that this is .restored by the end of the initial year, (X = 25.6). Second-year"^ trainees^ were^ found^ to^ have^ consistently and significantly higher self-confidence levels than their Head Start controls. No significant changes in the control group's self- confidence were noted over time. By far, the most robust of our findings to date have been in the area of cognitively oriented, child-centered^ beliefs. SLich beliefs have been found to increase with time in (MA training during the first year and slightly decrease during^ the second year (Peters & Sul.ton, in press). This^ cross-sectional finding was replicated in an 18 month longitudinal study^ (Sutton & Peters, 1983). CDA^ trainees^ were^ found^ to^ be^ significantly more likelY to endorse such beliefs than Head^ Start^ controls (Peters, 1984) , both^ initially^ and^ after^ training,^ and^ showed^ a trend toward greater endorsement than undergraduates completing a

four-yea early childhood teacher training program (Peters &

Sutton, in press). Adherence^ to^ such^ beliefs^ was^ founo^ to^ he related to specific characteristics^ of^ the^ CDA^ training^ program (low routinization,wand supervision and high levels of complexity) 'k

What Does Research Tell

(Sutton, 1983). That sulth trainees more strongly endorse child-centered, cognitively oriented beliefs at the outset of training clearly points to a self-selection factor for those entering -the program. Dicussion We at Penn State have gained, considerable experience with CDA training over the past several year. We have trained close to 3CD CDA's and currently have 175 CDA trainees in our programs. We have incorporated CDA raining^ in^ our^ undergraduate^ program and have involved CDA trainees from almost all of HHS Region III CDA Training programs in our research. Our research findings' corroborate our -gut' reactions. Our data are consistent with those of the national survey of CDA's andjwith those of smaller studies conducted by ot..hers. CDA training has made a difference in the lives of those involved. CDA's are better, more self-confident teachers who view themselves as professionals. They^ seek^ additional^ professional growth through formal educational programs. Additionally, they have a better understanding of child development, a coherent set of beliefs about learning and development, and endorse child-centered approaches toward early childhood education. In shortl.those enterinb the CDA process, completing training, and getting credentialed are likely to have the observed competence and personal attributes of excellent early childhood teachers. Some^ of^ the^ "success"^ of^ the^ program

likely due to selfselection. Directors^ and^ Education

WhatDoes Research Tell

Footnotes Paper presented as part' of^ CLA^ Preconference^ Sessii.on,^ Annual Meeting of the National Association -For theEducationof Young Children, Los Angeles, Cal i:f Ornia, November^ 8,^ 1984.

  1. The^ CDA^ functional^ area^ indicators^ get^ at^ these characteristics as well, but, with some excepti.ons, the characterist,ics,cutacross-functionalareas and^ represent^ a di-F-Ferent/11"-flctor" structure.

10 9

Re-ferences

What Does Research Tell

4 Srawley, G., Gerstein, H., & Watkin's, K. A. '(1T81). compe.cency-based training program for daycare personnel. Child Care Quarterly1.10(2) 125-136: Llewellyn, E. (1983). The _effects of groviding independence and

generalization oggortunities on the lernintro+ ChiLd

Development Associate trainees. , 41, ,Unpublished doctoral disSerttion" The Pennsylvania State University.' Peters, D. L. (1984)., Introductory skills grogram for services aersonnef (CDA -Training: Description and ' evaluation). 'The, Pennsylvania State University, College of Human DeVelopment. Peters, D. L., & Sutton, R. E. (In press). The effects of CDA training on the beliefs, attitudes., and behaviors of Head Start personnel. Child^ Care^ Quarterly. Pettycirove, W. (1981). The Child Development Associate credential as a dhild care staff standard: Accuracy, career development, and policy implications. Child Care Quarterly,

10(1), 43Fq.

Prudhoe, C. Ni. (1983). An evaluation of three greservice grogr.ams for early childhood gersonnel. Unpublished Master's thesis, The Pennsylvania State University. Sutton, R. E. (1993). The dev.elogment. qf a mea.sunp to psseps dimensions o+ inservice training grogra.ms. (^) Unpublished doctoral, dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.

ii