Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Attachment Theory: John Dollard and Neal Miller, Study notes of Psychology

John Dollard and Neal Miller collaborated to develop the learning theory of attachment that connects theories from Sigmund Freud and Clark Hull to reconcile psychoanalysis and behaviorism.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 03/31/2022

yorket
yorket 🇺🇸

4.4

(38)

276 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Attachment Theory: John Dollard and Neal Miller
Carla Cabrera, M.S., Lisa Lashley, Psy.D., and Charles Golden, Ph.D.
Nova Southeastern University, College of Psychology
John Dollard and Neal Miller collaborated to develop the learning theory of attachment
that connects theories from Sigmund Freud and Clark Hull to reconcile psychoanalysis and
behaviorism. Their combined interests helped with the efforts to develop a unified theory
incorporating psychodynamic theory, learning theory, and influence of sociocultural factors.
Dollard and Miller suggested that attachment becomes a learned behavior acquired
through classical and operant conditioning. Dollard and Miller’s learning theory of attachment
stated hat the cause for attachment between the child and the mother was because the mother fed
the infant and not due to a profound and enduring emotional connection, as described by Bowlby
and Robertson. Dollard and Miller suggested that infants are born without rules for processing
information, and that information is added and rules for processing are formed by sensory
experiences. Therefore, for attachment to occur, behaviors are learned rather than innate.
The learning theory of attachment consists of four processes: drive, cue, response and
reinforcement. Drives are innate, biologically determined urges to attain goals or satisfy needs.
They produce discomfort that impels humans to act when encountering a cue. A cue is anything
that serves as a signal, triggering a behavioral response to reduce the drive. The more a child
becomes successful at reducing the drive, the more likely the response to the cue is expected to
occur.
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Attachment Theory: John Dollard and Neal Miller and more Study notes Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Attachment Theory: John Dollard and Neal Miller Carla Cabrera, M.S., Lisa Lashley, Psy.D., and Charles Golden, Ph.D. Nova Southeastern University, College of Psychology John Dollard and Neal Miller collaborated to develop the learning theory of attachment that connects theories from Sigmund Freud and Clark Hull to reconcile psychoanalysis and behaviorism. Their combined interests helped with the efforts to develop a unified theory incorporating psychodynamic theory, learning theory, and influence of sociocultural factors. Dollard and Miller suggested that attachment becomes a learned behavior acquired through classical and operant conditioning. Dollard and Miller’s learning theory of attachment stated hat the cause for attachment between the child and the mother was because the mother fed the infant and not due to a profound and enduring emotional connection, as described by Bowlby and Robertson. Dollard and Miller suggested that infants are born without rules for processing information, and that information is added and rules for processing are formed by sensory experiences. Therefore, for attachment to occur, behaviors are learned rather than innate. The learning theory of attachment consists of four processes: drive, cue, response and reinforcement. Drives are innate, biologically determined urges to attain goals or satisfy needs. They produce discomfort that impels humans to act when encountering a cue. A cue is anything that serves as a signal, triggering a behavioral response to reduce the drive. The more a child becomes successful at reducing the drive, the more likely the response to the cue is expected to occur.

According to Dollard and Miller, the basis for the learning of attachments is the provision of food. Before attachment is learned, classical and operant conditioning occur. In classical conditioning an infant gains pleasure by being fed. The unconditioned stimulus is food and the unconditioned response is pleasure, which refers to a learned response to the previously neutral stimuli. When the infant is being fed, it begins to associate the person providing the food with the food itself. The primary caregiver providing food is initially the neutral stimulus. Progressively, the primary caregiver becomes the unconditioned stimulus as the infant associates him/her with food. Attachment is learned when the infant gains pleasure in the presence of the primary caregiver, at which point, the primary caregiver becomes the conditioned stimulus and pleasure becomes the conditioned response. The infant therefore is regarded to form an attachment with whomever feeds it. During operant conditioning, a behavior must be reinforced in order to be maintained. This requires multiple responses to find the one that is best suited to satisfy the drives. Infants cry when they are hungry, causing their mother to provide food, an example of a primary reinforcement. At the same time, they may feel the comfort and connection with their mother, causing a secondary reinforcement. When the infant perceives an uncomfortable state, the caregiver will act upon comforting it. Food will comfort the infant and, as a result, crying will be learned through negative reinforcement which would result in drive reduction. Because there was initial disturbance to the child’s level of homeostasis, a drive was developed to fulfill that specific need, such as being fed, and bring the child to a level of relaxation. As time progresses, the child associates the pleasure of feeling comfortable by being fed with the primary caregiver.

psychology. Their learning theory of attachment aimed to clarify attachment formation as they sought to combine various behavioral and psychoanalytic concepts. Further Reading Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E. (1950). Personality and psychotherapy; an analysis in terms of learning, thinking, and culture. New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill. Kelland, M. (2015). Learning theory and personality development. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/ccabr/AppData/Local/Packages/Microsoft.MicrosoftEdge_8wekyb3d8bb we/TempState/Downloads/learning-theory-and-personality-development-1.pdf “Learning Theory of Attachment.” (n.d.). Retrieved on February 27, 2018 from http://www.psychteacher.co.uk/attachment/learning-theory-of-attachment.html McLeod, S. A. (2009). Attachment Theory. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/attachment.html