Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Company Law Exam Questions and Answers for the Companies Ordinance 1984, Exams of Corporate Law

A set of questions and answers for a company law exam focused on the companies ordinance 1984. The questions cover various topics such as liability of a company for lawyer fees, legality of certain articles of association clauses, conditions for raising capital from the public, and more. Students preparing for a company law exam based on the companies ordinance 1984 will find this document useful for understanding the key concepts and requirements.

Typology: Exams

2011/2012

Uploaded on 08/26/2012

devashish
devashish 🇮🇳

4.3

(24)

114 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
COMPANY LAW (Marks 100)
Module D (3 hours)
Q.1 (a) A newly incorporated company has received a bill from a corporate lawyer for
services relating to company’s incorporation. The lawyer was hired by the
promoters who have refused to make the payment.
Explain whether the company is liable to pay this amount. (03)
(b) Articles of association of JS Cement Limited, a listed company, includes a clause
according to which, one member is prohibited from casting his vote in general
meeting.
Comment on the legality of the above clause. (02)
(c) Under what conditions, the Companies Ordinance 1984 would override the
memorandum of association of the company? (02)
Q.2 Rajab Limited operates an approved employees’ provident fund. The employer and
employees contribute 8.33% of the basic salary every month.
The annual accounts of the company for the year ended December 31, 2006, presented in
the board meeting revealed that an amount of Rs. 3.5 million is payable to the fund by the
company. It has been classified as a long term loan payable in installments up to
December 31, 2010 at an interest of 15% per annum. This loan was obtained for the
purpose of the company’s business only. The company has paid the first installment due
on December 31, 2006.
You are required to:
(a) Discuss the provisions of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 regarding collection and
deposit of contributions relating to the provident fund; and
(b) Explain whether the loan obtained by Rajab Limited is in compliance with the
requirements of the Companies Ordinance, 1984.
(07)
(02)
Q.3 (a) Muharram Limited, a listed company, has found out that one of its directors does not
meet the eligibility criteria provided in the Companies Ordinance, 1984. The said
director has already attended three meetings of the Board of Directors.
Describe the impact of the above on the resolutions passed by the Board. Also
explain whether the concerned director can attend future meetings of the Board. (03)
(b) The election of directors of Ramadan Limited, a listed company, is due in March
2007. The directors of the company have decided that liability of one of the
directors, to be appointed in March 2007, will be unlimited.
Briefly describe the additional steps which the company is required to follow, with
regards to appointment of a director with unlimited liability. (03)
docsity.com
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Company Law Exam Questions and Answers for the Companies Ordinance 1984 and more Exams Corporate Law in PDF only on Docsity!

COMPANY LAW (Marks 100)

Module D (3 hours)

Q.1 (a) A newly incorporated company has received a bill from a corporate lawyer for services relating to company’s incorporation. The lawyer was hired by the promoters who have refused to make the payment.

Explain whether the company is liable to pay this amount. (03)

(b) Articles of association of JS Cement Limited, a listed company, includes a clause according to which, one member is prohibited from casting his vote in general meeting.

Comment on the legality of the above clause.

(c) Under what conditions, the Companies Ordinance 1984 would override the memorandum of association of the company? (02)

Q.2 Rajab Limited operates an approved employees’ provident fund. The employer and employees contribute 8.33% of the basic salary every month.

The annual accounts of the company for the year ended December 31, 2006, presented in the board meeting revealed that an amount of Rs. 3.5 million is payable to the fund by the company. It has been classified as a long term loan payable in installments up to December 31, 2010 at an interest of 15% per annum. This loan was obtained for the purpose of the company’s business only. The company has paid the first installment due on December 31, 2006.

You are required to:

(a) Discuss the provisions of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 regarding collection and deposit of contributions relating to the provident fund; and (b) Explain whether the loan obtained by Rajab Limited is in compliance with the requirements of the Companies Ordinance, 1984.

Q.3 (a) Muharram Limited, a listed company, has found out that one of its directors does not meet the eligibility criteria provided in the Companies Ordinance, 1984. The said director has already attended three meetings of the Board of Directors.

Describe the impact of the above on the resolutions passed by the Board. Also explain whether the concerned director can attend future meetings of the Board. (03)

(b) The election of directors of Ramadan Limited, a listed company, is due in March

  1. The directors of the company have decided that liability of one of the directors, to be appointed in March 2007, will be unlimited.

Briefly describe the additional steps which the company is required to follow, with regards to appointment of a director with unlimited liability. (03)

(c) The Board of directors of RS Limited wants to appoint Mr. Salahuddin, an employee of the company, as Chief Executive of the company. You are required to explain the following:

(i) The minimum number of shares required to be acquired by Mr. Salahuddin. (ii) The tenure of office for which Mr. Salahuddin may be appointed. (iii) Will it be necessary to obtain members’ approval of the terms and conditions being offered to him? (06)

(d) The directors or promoters are responsible for any untrue statement contained in a prospectus. What are the grounds on the basis of which directors or promoters can escape such liability? (06)

Q.4 (a) Safar Textile Limited was incorporated in December 2006. In February 2007, the company offered its shares to the general public. The offer has been fully subscribed.

Explain the requirements of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 in respect of moneys received from share subscriptions and when the company would be able to utilize the subscription money. (05)

(b) The board of directors of Shaban (Pvt.) Limited have approved a major expansion program for which they are planning to raise Rs 35 million from the general public. The current authorized and paid up capital of the company is Rs. 100 million and Rs. 65 million respectively.

Advise the company about the changes required to be incorporated in the memorandum and articles of association, to make the company eligible for raising capital from the public. (^) (05)

(c) RA Limited is a public limited company. It has two classes of shares namely ‘A’ and ‘B’. The directors of the company have decided to restrict the voting rights of Class ‘A’ shareholders. In lieu thereof, they shall be allowed to get preference in payment of dividend.

State the procedures through which the decision of directors can be put into effect. (03)

(d) Zilhaj Limited has been incurring losses since last many years. The directors have now decided to restructure the company’s business. As part of the financial restructuring, one of the suggestion is to reduce the capital of the company which is not represented by available assets.

State the procedures that the company has to follow for reduction of capital, under the Companies Ordinance, 1984. (07)

Q.5 (a) The shareholders of Ramadan Limited holding 20% of the voting power submitted a requisition to hold an extraordinary general meeting (EOGM) to remove the auditor of the company. The company neither called the EOGM nor allowed them to hold the meeting at the company’s registered office. The said meeting was then held at some other place and resolution for removal of the auditor was passed.

Discuss the validity of the said meeting and resolution passed therein. (05)

(b) (i) List down the type of companies who are not required to hold the statutory meeting. (02)

(ii) State the provisions of the Companies Ordinance, 1984 regarding adjournment of statutory meeting. (02)