Argumentative Essay On Gun Control
Gun Control: Is It An Effective Way To Limit Crime?
The theme of gun control is a sensitive and controversial issue that has been a subject of discussion for
eons of time. In the wake of recent tragic mass shootings, the issue has polarized individuals in regards
to what is the best solution. In one side of the debate, there are individuals who favor having
restrictions placed over guns. On the other hand, there are individuals who are opposed to regulating
and controlling guns.
The individuals against gun control mainly consider controlling guns will not solve the existing challenges
created by guns such as crimes or mass shootings. Having the right to control guns is an effective
deterrent. All law-abiding citizens should be allowed to carry guns, this is so as to defend themselves
against individuals who may have intentions of harming them such as in mass shooting cases.
Controlling of arms and guns will not deter criminals from possessing guns. Whether there are laws
passed so as to restrict the usage of guns by criminals will not in itself solve incidences of mass
shootings. This is because criminals already have the intent of not obeying the law hence whenever they
are presented with an opportunity of using them in the public, they tend to use them irrespective of the
laws and regulations that are in place. It is for this reason that controlling guns will not be an effective
mechanism since criminals do not operate on the laws of demand and supply. Instead, the main re asons
that lead to them performing heinous acts such as mass shootings lie solely in issues such as their
psychotic behavior (McClellan, Chandler & Erdal 623). To this end, there is a need for seeking
mechanism which should be used at taming these criminals from performing or carrying out their
activities within the public.
Since past and present laws have failed towards enacting stringent measures of controlling and
regulating the selling of firearms to criminals, there is a need of looking for alternative perspectives that
have led towards this crisis. It should be understood that cases of mass shootings that are carried by
criminals are achieved primarily due to having the supply of illegal arms in trade. Since there is a lot of
money that is made in the black market, there is a need of having to understand that somebody will
profit from selling these illegal firearms in the black market and they later settle on the wrong hands. As
a result, criminals are known to obtain these firearms in an easy way as long as they have money to
spend on buying them. If criminals want a gun, there is nothing that will stop them from accessing one.
It should be understood that criminals search for guns since they already have several enemies who are
trailing them. Rather than being caught with no form of security, criminals believe by having a gun to
protect themselves would help them from unwanted harm (Cooper 103). Thus, n trying to restrict guns
in the population in the efforts of reducing mass shootings in the public will not only be detrimental
consequences but also one which will leave the public exposed to gangs and criminals who are equipped
with mostly illegal firearms that have been bought in the black market.
The other argument against having more and more regulations placed in controlling guns so as to
minimize mass shootings is that, in the minds of gangs and criminals, the more and more there are
regulations that are restricting guns, the more these efforts make the criminals and gangs be happy. This
is because they understand that the more and more laws are enacted to limit guns in the population,
the easier it becomes for having greater chances of civilians not defending themselves whenever they
are attacked. The civilians will not have the means of defending themselves from individuals who have
