



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
How the phenomenology of Alfred schutz can explain who nigerian get experience of their social world. With this theory Nigeria's are like other people of the world who the people of the past have a greater influence to how they understand their environment
Typology: Summaries
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Alfred schutz (1899-1959). Alfred Schutz was born in Vienna in 1899. He was an only child to an upper-middle class Austrain Jewish family and had a strong mother. In his youth he attended a classical Gymnasium in Vienna and developed a lifelong interest in music. After his serving in world war I, he received his doctorate in the philosophy of law at Vienna. Alfred schutz was an Austrian philosopher and social phenomenologist whose work bridged Sociological and phenomelogical tradition. Schultz is gradually being recognized as one of the 20th century's leading philosopher of social science. During his time at the University of Vienna, he attending lectures given by Max Weber. Schultz also work in a bank. He was once described by Edmund Husserl as "a banker by day and a philosopher by night". Schultz obtained his PhD from Vienna in 1921, he also moved to the United States in 1939 where he became a part-time faculty member at a University New school for social Research in New York. In 1952 he became professor at the same institution. Alfred Schutz was very involved with the interpretive sociology of Max Weber. Weber as one of the distinguished social scientist of his time had a great influence in Schutz's work, particularly in the issues of subjectivity and social action. It was in these topics that Schutz began to pursue the application of Husserl's phenomenology, in his work, The phenomenology of social world. He shows his understanding and his ambitions to use it in the grasping of social phenomena. Schutz was a founding member of the international Phenomenological society and editor of the philosophy and Phenomenological Research Journal. His writings had a lasting impact on the social sciences, both on phenomenological approaches to sociology and ethnomethodology. Peter L. Berger was also a student of Schutz, was arguably the best-known living sociologist influenced by Schutz, especially through his creation of the social construction theory. Berger and Thomas Luckman went on to use Schutz's work to further understand human culture and reality, through the development of a new form of the Sociology of Knowledge.
Phenomenology is commonly understood in either of the two ways: as a discipline field in philosophy, or as a movement in history of philosophy. The discipline of phenomenology may be defined initially as the study of structures of experience, or consciousness. Literally, phenomenology is the study of "phenomena": appearance of things, or things as they appear in our experience, or the ways we experience things, thus the meaning things have in our experience. Basically, phenomenology studies the structure of various types of experience ranging from perception, thought, memory, imagination, emotion, desire, and volition to bodily awareness, embodied action, and social activity, including linguistic activity. The structure of these forms of experience typically involves what Husserl called “intentionality”, that is, the directedness of experience toward things in the world, the property of consciousness that it is a consciousness of or about something. Phenomenology is an approach to qualitative research that focuses on the commonality of a lived experience within a particular group. The fundamental goal of the approach is to arrive at a description of the nature of the particular phenomenon (Creswell, 2013). Some philosophers argue that we can never have definite knowledge of what the world outside or
minds is really like ‘in itself’- we only know what our senses tell us and we cannot determine whether or not our senses see, smell etc. the true picture. This is the starting point for a philosophy known as phenomenology, developed by Edmund Husserl (1859-1938)
Alfred Schutz is often referred to as the founder of phenomenological sociology. Social phenomenology is an approach within the field of sociology that aims to reveal what role human awareness plays in the production of social action, social situations and social world. In essence, phenomenology is the belief that society is a human construction. Phenomenology was originally developed by a German Mathematician named Edmud Husserl in the early 1900s in order to locate the source or essence of reality in human consciousness. It was untill 1960s that it entered the field of sociology by Alfred Schutz who sought to provide a philosophical foundation for Max Weber's interpretive sociology (Social Action). He did this by applying the phenomenological philosophy of Husserl to the study of the social world. Schultz postulated that it is subjective meaning that give rise to an apparently objective world. He argued that people depend upon language and the "stock of Knowledge" they have accumulated to enable social interaction. All social interaction requires that individuals characterize others in his world. Schultz claims that we experience the world as containing various relatively distinct and independent provinces of meaning (Schutz 1962). Schutz's main intellectual project was to include the phenomenological view in the social sciences in order to renovate the foundation of interpretive sociology by putting it on a phenomenological framework. With this in mind, he developed a wide base to examine social phenomena using Husserl's phenomenological method, which he studied, mastered and even reinterpreted. Husserl himself gave him credit for being such a deep and serious expert of his phenomenology (Walsh,1967). Schutz agreed with Husserl that thought and experience are in profround relation to the world. For him, social phenomena such as economic and legal systems and institutions should be understood in their origin and development surroundings so that all social phenomena and interaction involved were not taken for a granted. His phenomenological sociology come to be as a means to account for these purpose. In this respect, he was interested in understanding how a human being become a social being; how language occurs and how symbols are used in communications; why do we get to understand others and their action and others ours; how are comprehension and communication possible; how and why do we make sense of our action and where and how does the motivation for making sense come from (Schutz, 1967). He related these questions with the structures of consciousness, which in his view intervenes in organizing experience and therefore, in organizing the social world.
Schutz concentrated on people's experience of everyday life and the ways in which everyday experience come to be "taken for granted" as part of the life world, the world as it is routinely expected and lived as natural. Life-world in the work of Schutz refers to the world of immediate experience common to all of us, not the private world of Ang individual. It is the "self-evident", "pre-scientific", and "taken for granted". World of daily life is the world dominated by "eminently
and therefore more safe. Schutz noted that, objects in the life-world are not simple unique, individual entities, mountains, tress, houses, animals, and person. No matter what we encounter it is something whose more or less general type we are familiar with. For example, a person who has only very limited knowledge of trees can perhaps not tell whether the tree she passes in the wood is a neem or a mahogany, but she sees it immediately as a tree. Therefore, we have a kind of immediate knowledge about how to understand our environment, and the primary source of this knowledge is previous experience, both the experience we have had ourselves, and experience transmitted to us by others. For Schutz, inter-subjectivity was at the genesis of the life-world, a fundamental part that gave it structure. As part of the experience assembled upon the life-world and being a shared and not private one, it is the basis on which all social relations are built. Intersubjectivity is the basis for living together with others in specific dimensions of time and space and for sharing the understanding of the life-world with them. Through intersubjectivity we refine the stock of knowledge by validating or adjusting it to subsequent experiences where the stock is only partially originated by personal experience. The biggest part comes from living in the life-world inter-subjectively, that is, through the assimilation of the experience with others. And the meanings of these experiences are common and shared with others. In regard to this explanation an example from Nigerian environment can be given, people from the masses social class try to understand and shared experience among their group about politicians, that are people whom are corrupted and all what comes from their mouth is lie, they are people of dishonest. This is what they understand and structured their social world and is been shared among them, not a meaning of one single individual but common to all members of the group relate and interact in such order. And another example is the belief or consciousness that Gombe State University has the most beautiful environment, this speculation may originate from one single individual but at the long run it may be validated and subsequently experience by other members of the group and be part of the social reality. He goes further to the investigation of intersubjectivity, how one subject has experiential access to another subject, and how a community of we is constituted, how a multitude of experience can constituted the structures of meaning that make up social reality. He also focuses on the aspect of socialization of human knowledge: it's structural socialization, it's genetic socialization , and it's social distribution. As for the structural aspect, Schutz emphasizes that the knowledge we have is knowledge that others could have as well, if they had access to the same facts as we have access to. Knowledge also has a social genesis, in that most of our knowledge has been transmitted to us through others (parents, friends, and teachers who were themselves thought by teachers and so on). This mean that the knowledge we have to this social world was not a something new but with which is shared and transmitted from the past to the present and even to future. Therefore the way we experience and give meaning to our world, the way our next generation may likely explain and view the world.
Phenomenology of Schutz has to do with the people understanding of life-world or world around them, it focuses on meanings, feelings, experiences that people attach to their society. Phenomenology is concern with the human sense in world around them based on the culture of the
people to identify the situation of the every life and which to so extent explain the world-life in Nigeria. Phenomenological sociology emphasis on the need to take everyday life seriously, primary object of social reality include institutions, organization, ethnicgrouping, classes, and so on must be regarded as a product of human activity and the sociological task is to understand the working of this product. Nick Crossley (1996), outline some problematic on the Schutz Phenomenological sociology. According Crossley, Schutz failed to consider the community as a system that perpetuated itself through space and time. REFERENCES