Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

APMA Requests for ICD-10 Code Changes: Foot Conditions and Fractures, Slides of Biology

Letters from the American Podiatric Medical Association (APMA) requesting changes to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) coding system. The letters discuss the need for separate codes for conditions such as bunion, joint pain in the foot, sinus tarsi syndrome, shin splints, Salter Harris fractures, sesamoiditis, congenital talipes varus, and metatarsus varus. The letters also provide details on the current ICD-9 codes and their mapping to ICD-10, as well as proposed changes and implementation timelines.

Typology: Slides

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

christina
christina 🇺🇸

4.6

(23)

404 documents

1 / 9

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
APMA Requests Status
*Item number references 10/8/2010 letter submitted by APMA, following September 2010 C&M meeting where they provided
comment on the GEMs 1
Item Topic Reference Details of request Status
2 Bunion
10/8/2010
APMA
Letter
APMA: The common diagnosis of “bunion” found in ICD-9 is not present in ICD-
10. Bunion is mapped to M20.10 (hallux valgus). This is an inaccuracy. A bunion
deformity is not a hallux valgus deformity. A bunion involves bony proliferation at
the level of the first metatarsal head (distal portion of the metatarsal), typically, but
not exclusively present on the medial bone, but may also involve the dorsal aspect of
the metatarsal. When the fifth metatarsal head involves bony proliferation it is
primarily present laterally and/or dorsally on the distal metatarsal. ICD-9 code 727.1
(bunion, bursitis of bunion) is used to describe these deformities whether present on
the first or fifth metatarsal heads. There is no similar deformity description in ICD-
10.
ICD-10 does, however, include “hallux valgus”, as does ICD-9. Hallux valgus is a
positional (rotational) deformity of the great toe relative to the first metatarsal.
Hallux valgus is accurately represented in ICD-10.
APMA is recommending the creation of separate codes for a bunion (first metatarsal
bone deformity) and bunionette (fifth metatarsal bone deformity), right, left, and
bilateral in ICD-10.
9/19/12:
Presented at ICD-9-CM C&M
meeting to revise tabular to
create codes M21.61 and
M21.62 for bunion and
bunionette.
Proposed to be implemented
on 10/1/2015 (1 year after
ICD-10-CM implementation).
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9

Partial preview of the text

Download APMA Requests for ICD-10 Code Changes: Foot Conditions and Fractures and more Slides Biology in PDF only on Docsity!

*Item number references 10/8/2010 letter submitted by APMA, following September 2010 C&M meeting where they provided

comment on the GEMs

Item Topic Reference Details of request Status

2 Bunion

APMA

Letter

APMA: The common diagnosis of “bunion” found in ICD-9 is not present in ICD-

  1. Bunion is mapped to M20.10 (hallux valgus). This is an inaccuracy. A bunion deformity is not a hallux valgus deformity. A bunion involves bony proliferation at the level of the first metatarsal head (distal portion of the metatarsal), typically, but not exclusively present on the medial bone, but may also involve the dorsal aspect of the metatarsal. When the fifth metatarsal head involves bony proliferation it is primarily present laterally and/or dorsally on the distal metatarsal. ICD-9 code 727. (bunion, bursitis of bunion) is used to describe these deformities whether present on the first or fifth metatarsal heads. There is no similar deformity description in ICD-

ICD-10 does, however, include “hallux valgus”, as does ICD-9. Hallux valgus is a positional (rotational) deformity of the great toe relative to the first metatarsal. Hallux valgus is accurately represented in ICD-10. APMA is recommending the creation of separate codes for a bunion (first metatarsal bone deformity) and bunionette (fifth metatarsal bone deformity), right, left, and bilateral in ICD-10.

Presented at ICD-9-CM C&M meeting to revise tabular to create codes M21.61 and M21.62 for bunion and bunionette.

Proposed to be implemented on 10/1/2015 (1 year after ICD-10-CM implementation).

*Item number references 10/8/2010 letter submitted by APMA, following September 2010 C&M meeting where they provided

comment on the GEMs

Revise code titles for M25.571, .572, .579 to read “and foot”

APMA

Letter

APMA: ICD-9 719.47 (pain in joint involving ankle and foot) maps only to the ankle joint in ICD-10 (M25.579), not including the description of the foot. ICD- offers other joint changes in the foot including joint effusion and joint stiffness, but not of joint pain in the foot. There needs to be an ICD-10 code set for joint pain in the foot. The ICD-10 coding includes an “unspecified” ankle code, but no bilateral option. ICD-9 719.47 (pain in joint involving ankle and foot) should map in ICD- to right, left and bilateral codes, in addition to the unspecified code. M25.571, Pain in right ankle M25.572, Pain in left ankle M25.579, Pain in unspecified ankle [All to] 719.47, Pain in joint involving ankle and foot The ICD-10 maps foot pain to M79.671 (pain in right foot); M79.672 (pain in left foot; and M79.673 (pain in unspecified foot). Toe pain maps to M79.674 (pain in right toe(s)); M79.675 (pain in left toe(s)); and M79.676 (pain in unspecified toe(s)). The issue is the toe and foot pain do not map to joint pain (M25.57-). Instead, it is directed to more generalized pain which does not characterized the condition correctly. Like other joint conditions, this should be classified just like other joint pain using the example of ankle pain as noted above.

Presented at ICD-9-CM C&M meeting to revise code titles in tabular to include ankle and foot.

Change effective 10/1/ (before ICD-10-CM implementation)

*Item number references 10/8/2010 letter submitted by APMA, following September 2010 C&M meeting where they provided

comment on the GEMs

12 Shin splints

APMA

Letter

APMA: Shin splints (ICD-9 844.9) maps in the ICD-10 Index to T79.6 (traumatic ischemia of muscle). GEM maps shin splints to S86.911A (strain of unspecified muscle(s) and tendon(s) at lower leg level, right leg, initial encounter) and S86.912A (strain of unspecified muscle(s) and tendon(s) at lower leg level, left leg, and initial encounter). Shin splits are not clinically ischemia of muscle. Shin splints are characterized by inflammation of the periosteum of the tibial and of the anterior and medial muscles of the lower leg. M60.86- (other myositis, lower leg) offers an option and possibility of a more correct code from the existing set of codes. However, offering a new set of codes (our suggestion: M60.863 (other myositis, shin splints, right lower leg); M86.864 (other myositis, shin splints, left lower leg); and M86.865 (other myositis, shin splints, unspecified lower leg) would be a more appropriate diagnoses code set.

Presented at ICD-9-CM C&M meeting to revise index to code S86.89.

Change will be on 10/1/ addenda (before ICD-10-CM implementation)

*Item number references 10/8/2010 letter submitted by APMA, following September 2010 C&M meeting where they provided

comment on the GEMs

Salter Harris fractures of foot

APMA

Letter

Sept 2012 APMA Letter (pg. 2)

APMA (2010): Salter Harris fractures and epiphyseal fractures only address tibia and fibula, S89.001A-S89.399S. There should be an option for the bones of the foot (metatarsals and phalanges) as these, too, are categorized by these types of fractures.

Sept 2012: APMA letter with suggested codes needed for Salter Harris fractures of calcaneus, metatarsals & phalanges.

Presented proposal for 378 new codes to capture these.

Proposed to be implemented on 10/1/2015 (1 year after ICD-10-CM implementation).

Sesamoiditis ICD-9-CM: 733.

ICD-10-CM: see osteomyelitis, spec type NEC

APMA

Letter

APMA: ICD-9 733.99 for “Sesamoiditis” when referenced in the ICD-10 Index directs to the reader to see “Osteomyelitis”. This is not correct. Sesamoiditis is an inflammatory condition, not a bone infection (osteomyelitis). There is no appropriate code available in ICD-10. There needs to be an Inflammation of either the tibial (medial) or fibular (lateral) sesamoid bone of the first metatarsal added.

Presented at ICD-9-CM C&M meeting to revise index to delete “see” note and index to code M25.8-

Change effective 10/1/ (before ICD-10-CM implementation)

*Item number references 10/8/2010 letter submitted by APMA, following September 2010 C&M meeting where they provided

comment on the GEMs

**Metatarsus varus (congenital metatarsus adductus) ICD-9-CM

ICD-10-CM indexed to Q66.2. Congenital metatarsus (primus) varus**

APMA

Letter

APMA: ICD-9 754.53 (congenital metatarsus adductus) is mapped to Q66.2. Metatarsus adductus is adduction of all the metatarsals not just the first metatarsal (metatarsus primus varus). Congenital metatarsus adductus could map to Q66. (other congenital varus deformities of feet), but a better choice would be for this diagnosis to have its own ICD-10 code.

Presented at ICD-9-CM C&M meeting to expand Q66.2 for these two conditions.

Proposed to be implemented on 10/1/2015 (1 year after ICD-10-CM implementation).

Spontaneous rupture/ disruption of tendon

APMA

Letter

APMA: ICD-9 727.67 (Achilles tendon rupture, non-traumatic) crosswalk in ICD- 10 to M66.369, an unspecified code. There should be choices for right and left sides. A bilateral code should be added. In addition, the APMA recommends, base of the importance and function of the Achilles tendon, that this tendon should have its own specific code set for right, left and bilateral in ICD-10. 3/4/2013: NCHS received response from AAOS/CCRC to add this to index to codes at M66.86-

NCHS will propose addenda change at Sept 2013 ICD-9- CM C&M meeting to add to ICD-10-CM index to M66.86- Effective 10/1/2015.

*Item number references 10/8/2010 letter submitted by APMA, following September 2010 C&M meeting where they provided

comment on the GEMs

N/A

Congenital coxa vara and coxa valga

APMA

Excel spreadsheet (also noted by AHIMA)

APMA: ICD-9-CM has unique codes for several orthopedic conditions but there are no parallel codes for those conditions in ICD-10-CM. The conditions are acquired valgus and varus deformities of the hip (codes 736.31 and 736.32), vertical talus as deformity (754.61) and congenital valgus and varus deformities of the hip (codes 755.61 and 755.62).

Presented at ICD-9-CM C&M meeting to expand Q65.8.

Change effective 10/1/ (before ICD-10-CM implementation)

N/A

Acquired coxa valga and coxa vara

APMA

Excel spreadsheet

APMA: From ICD9 to ICD 10 lumping 736.31 and 736.32 in same code (M21.85-) is unfounded, these are opposite deformities. In ICD 10 each should have its own.

Presented at ICD-9-CM C&M meeting to create at M21.05- and M21.06-.

Change effective 10/1/ (before ICD-10-CM implementation)