Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Aphasia: Historical Development, Legal Implications, and New Developments, Study notes of Communication

A historical overview of aphasia, its significance in legal matters, and recent developments in the field. It discusses the definition of aphasia, its historical background, and its impact on legal competency. The document also includes a case illustration of expert testimony by a speech pathologist and a psychiatrist in a child custody case.

What you will learn

  • What is aphasia and how is it defined?
  • How has aphasia been historically understood and classified?
  • What are the legal implications of aphasia and how has it been addressed in the courts?

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

faylin
faylin 🇺🇸

4.9

(8)

225 documents

1 / 7

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Aphasia and the Expert Medical Witness
RICHARD
T.
AND
ROBERT
RADA,
M.D.,
BRUCE
E.
KELLNER,
M.D.,
PH.D.-
Introduction
PORCH,
PH.D.,
The
incidence
of
cerebral vascular accident
in
the
U.S.
is
200
per
100,000
population
of
all ages,l
or
approximately
400,()()0
new strokes
per
year. Many
of
these patients develop
acute
or
chronic aphasia.
When
the
mental
capacity
or
legal competence
of
the
aphasic
patient
is
ljuestioned, it
is
frequently the psychiatrist whose
expert
testimony
is
requested.
In
1900,
Dr. Charles MiIIs,
writing
in the textbook
entitled
A System
of
Legal
Medicine,2
noted that the medical-legal aspects
of
aphasia had received little
attention
by compari-
son with
the
immense
literature
on
the general topic. A review
of
the recent medical
and
legal
literature
indicates that the situation remains unchanged today.
The
purpose
of
this
paper
is
to present a brief review
of
the historical development of aphasia,
of
aphasia as a legal matter,
and
of new developments in the field
of
aphasiology,
and
a
case illustration
of
combined
expert
testimony between a speech pathologist
and
a
psy-
chiatrist
in
a case involving child custody.
Definition of
Aphasia
Dorland's medical dictionary defines aphasia as
"a
defect
or
loss
of
power
of
expression
by speech, writing,
or
signs,
or
of
comprehending
spoken
or
written
language,
due
to
injury
or
disease
of
the
brain
centers."3
Injuries
to the
brain
frequently produce deficits
which
in
some way affect the
mental
capabilities
of
the
patient.
Damage to the left
hemisphere
is
frequently associated with the reduction
or
loss
of
communicative ability,
and
the
patient
is
described
as
having aphasia.
His
reduced capacity for carrying
out
all
encoding
and
decoding processes can be documented
and
various degrees
of
deficit can
be demonstrated in
the
broad areas
of
reading. writing. speaking
and
understanding.
Operationally.
the
brain
loses some
of
its ability
to
receive
and
send information, al-
though its
other
processes may remain intact.
Depending
upon
the
extent
of
breakdown
in communication, the
patient's
capacity to
handle
personal
and
social interaction may
be questioned.
The
Historical Development of
Aphaslology
The
modern
history
of
aphasia begins
in
the early
nineteenth
century with Franz
Joseph Gall,
better
known (or his theories
of
phrenology .• Gall was
the
first to suggest
that
linguistic capacities are functions of circumscribed
brain
areas.
In
1861, Broca
li
described
patients
who lost speech following damage to
the
third
frontal convolution.
He
presumed this area to be a
"center"
for
the
motor
images
of
speech. Shortly there-
after, Wernicke6 presented his first
paper
on aphasia associated with lesions
of
the
left
temporal lobe
and
suggested
that
in
addition
to the
motor
aphasia noted by Broca there
-
The
authors
are
all associated with the University
of
New Mexico School
of
Medicine. Dr.
Rada
is
Associate Professor
of
Ps~chiatrY;
Dr. Porch
is
Associate Professor,
Department
of
Communicative Disorders; Dr.
Kelln~r
is
Pr~fessor
of Psychiatry.
The
authors
wish to thank JanJues
M.
Quen, M.D
..
for suggesting the Benjamin Rush quotation.
231
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Aphasia: Historical Development, Legal Implications, and New Developments and more Study notes Communication in PDF only on Docsity!

Aphasia and the Expert Medical Witness

RICHARD T.

AND ROBERT

RADA, M.D., BRUCE E.

KELLNER, M.D., PH.D.-

Introduction

PORCH, PH.D.,

The incidence of cerebral vascular accident in the U.S. is 200 per 100,000 population of all ages,l or approximately 400,()()0 new strokes per year. Many of these patients develop acute or chronic aphasia. When the mental capacity or legal competence of the aphasic patient is ljuestioned, it is frequently the psychiatrist whose expert testimony is requested. In 1900, Dr. Charles MiIIs, writing in the textbook entitled A System of Legal Medicine, noted that the medical-legal aspects of aphasia had received little attention by compari- son with the immense literature on the general topic. A review of the recent medical and legal literature indicates that the situation remains unchanged today. The purpose of this paper is to present a brief review of the historical development of aphasia, of aphasia as a legal matter, and of new developments in the field of aphasiology, and a case illustration of combined expert testimony between a speech pathologist and a psy- chiatrist in a case involving child custody.

Definition of Aphasia

Dorland's medical dictionary defines aphasia as "a defect or loss of power of expression by speech, writing, or signs, or of comprehending spoken or written language, due to injury or disease of the brain centers."3 Injuries to the brain frequently produce deficits which in some way affect the mental capabilities of the patient. Damage to the left hemisphere is frequently associated with the reduction or loss of communicative ability, and the patient is described as having aphasia. His reduced capacity for carrying out all encoding and decoding processes can be documented and various degrees of deficit can be demonstrated in the broad areas of reading. writing. speaking and understanding. Operationally. the brain loses some of its ability to receive and send information, al- though its other processes may remain intact. Depending upon the extent of breakdown in communication, the patient's capacity to handle personal and social interaction may be questioned.

The Historical Development of Aphaslology

The modern history of aphasia begins in the early nineteenth century with Franz Joseph Gall, better known (or his theories of phrenology .• Gall was the first to suggest that linguistic capacities are functions of circumscribed brain areas. In 1861, Brocali described patients who lost speech following damage to the third frontal convolution. He presumed this area to be a "center" for the motor images of speech. Shortly there- after, Wernicke 6 presented his first paper on aphasia associated with lesions of the left temporal lobe and suggested that in addition to the motor aphasia noted by Broca there

  • The authors are all associated with the University of New Mexico School of Medicine. Dr. Rada is Associate Professor of Ps~chiatrY; Dr. Porch is Associate Professor, Department of Communicative Disorders; Dr. Kelln~r is Pr~fessor of Psychiatry. The authors wish to thank JanJues M. Quen, M.D .. for suggesting the Benjamin Rush quotation.

231

were also a sensory aphasia and a conduction aphasia. Since the middle of the nineteenth century, most investigators in aphasiology have focused on the basic question of the direct relationship between language and the brain and have attempted to discover direct "centers" where language capacities could be localized. John Hughlings Jackson 7 , was one of the fint to seriously question the theory of localization. Then, in 1891, Freud o wrote a monograph entitled "On Aphasia." Acknowledging his indebtedness to Hughlings Jackson, Freud attacked the classical localization theory and the idea of speech as a cerebral reflex. Marks 10 has recently presented an excellent historical analysis of the significance of Freud's work on aphasia. Although the significance of Freud's monograph on aphasia is recognized by aphasiologists, it is an interesting fact that it was not in· c1uded in his collected works. During the first part of the twentieth century, the development of the study of aphasia was profoundly influenced by both the first and second World Wars, which produced many instances of head trauma and subsequent aphasia. Sir Henry Headll^ developed the first comprehensive body of tests for aphasic behavior following World War I. Kurt Goldstein l2^.^13 organized a hospital for treatment of brain·injured soldiers in Frankfurt during the first World War and was one of the first to indicate that alterations in per· formance with brain damage could be understood only in relation to the total organism. He emphasized that a patient's personality as a whole undergoes changes as a result of disease and that it was simplistic to look at the manifestations of change only in terms of different discrete functions or structures. The broad classification of types of aphasia includes total or global aphasia, which is loss of all or nearly all speech function; expressive (motor, Broca's) aphasia, which in· volves deficiency in motor speech production; and receptive (sensory. Wernicke's) aphasia, which involves deficiency in understanding spoken speech. It has become common clinical practice to dichotomize aphasia into receptive and expressive aphasia. This simple dichotomy has recently bet:n criticized,14 and some investigators believe that the nature and classification of aphasia are more complex. For a more complete classification of the various types of aphasia, the reader is referred to Brain's Disease Of the N enJOus S)'stem 15 and Harrison'S Textbook of Internal ,(l'dicine.^16

Aphasia as a Legal Matter and the Role of the Psychiatrist In 1810, Benjamin Rush presented a lecture "On the Study of Medical Jurispru· dence."17 In that lecture he stated: It is possible a man may forget the names, and number, and even the faces of his children, and yet not forget that they are the lawful heirs of his property. It is possible that he may forget to call his different coins by their appropriate names, and yet retain a perfect knowledge of their number, denominations and uses .... Such persons should be considered as inti tied [sic] to all the benefits, and subject to all the penalties of civil and criminal laws of our country. Despite the early recognition of the importance of aphasia and its relationship to mental competency in "ariom legal matters. the medical·legal literature on aphasia and the majority of court cases are primarily concerned with liability,IR.lo compensation,2o recovery of damage.21. 22 and testamentary capacity.23.211 In addition, the legal competence of aphasic subjects has been raised in a few cases involving criminal responsibilit (^) y27,Z and those involving the ability of the aphasic to testify as a witness. 29 •^32 No cases in the literature could be found related to aphasia and legal competency in such areas as marriage. divorce, custody of children. or voting. The ·test of competency i, based on the particular legal question at issue. Therefore, the requirements for testamentary capacity are different from those for competency to stand trial, etc. The effect of aphasia on the client's competency must take into account the task which is germane to the specific legal issue. The legal question is 1I0t the mere

232

The Bu'Ie'" r

Differential Diagnosis of Aphasia. the Functional Communication Profile. Examining for Aphasia. Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. and the Porch Index of Com· municative Ability. Brookshire:J8 provides a description and discussion of each of these tests. The Porch Index of Communicative Abilit (^) y 39 is one recently developed method for assessing the aphasic patient which also attempts to quantify the extent and severity of the aphasia. In this test the patient is presented with 10 common objects (e. g .. tooth· brush. comb. fork. cigaret) and is asked to do a variety of common communicative tasks. e. g .• show (gestural). say (verbal) or write on paper (graphic) what one does with these items. The three modalities (gestural. verbal. and graphic) are then tested in increasingly more complicated tasks to observe the point at which a deficit of communi· cative functioning occurs. There are 18 modality subtests (8 gestural. 4 verbal and 6 graphic) and 10 objects for each sub test which means a total of 180 separate communi· cative tasks are graded. The responses of the subjects are graded on a scale from 1- no response-to l6--a complete and complex response (Table I). The grading of the response is based on a multidimensional scoring system 40 which consists of the scoring of not only the accuracy but also the responsiveness. the completeness. the promptness and the efficiency of the response (Fig. I). The mean score for each modality subtest is computed and the total of all subtests means is divided by 18 to yield an overall response

TABLE I

Multidimensional Scoring Categories of the Porch Index of Communicative Ability

Score

16

15 14

13

12

11

10

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

level

Complex

Complete Distorted

Complete- Delayed Incomplete

Incomplete- Delayed Corrected

Repetition

Cued

Related

Error Intelligible

Unintelligible

Minimal

Attention No Response

Accurate. responsive. complex, immediate, elaborative response to test item. Accurate, responsive. complete. immediate response to test item. Accurate, responsive, complete response to test item but with re- duced facility of production. Accurate, responsive, complete response to test item which is sig- nificantly slow or delayed. Accurate, responsive response to test Item which is lacking In completeness. Accurate, responsive, incomplete response to test item which is significantly slowed or delayed. Accurate response to test item self-correcting a previous error without request or after a prolonged delay. Accurate response to test item after a repetition of the instructions by request or after a prolonged delay. Accurate response to test item stimulated by a cue, additional information, or another test item. Inaccurate response to test item which is clearly related to or suggestive of an accurate response. Inaccurate response to the test item. Intelligible response which is not associated with the test item, for example, perseverative or automatic responses or an expressed indication of inability to respond. Unintelligible or incomprehensible response which can be differen- tiated from other responses. Unintelligible response which cannot be differentiated from other responses. Patient attends to test item but gives no responses. Patient exhibits no awareness of test item.

(^234) The Bulletin I

j

RESPONSIVE

CORRECTED 10 REPEATED 9 CUED 8 INTELLIGIBLE 5 UNINTELLIGIBLE 4 MINIMAL 3 ATTENTION 2 NO RESPONSE I

FIGURE I. The multidimensional binary-choice scoring system schematizing the flow of scorer decisions in deriving a response score of the Porch Index of Communicative Ability.

score. Thus, proper administration of this test allows for a thorough appraisal of the communicative skills of the subject in three modalities, and small changes in com- municative functioning can be accurately documented. Forty hours are required to become proficient in administering the Porch Index of Communicative Ability, and in the hands of the experienced examiner the test has a high level of interscorer reliability, test-retest stability and internal consistency when administered to aphasic patients. The test generally takes one hour to administer, although it can take longer for severely aphasic patients. Norms have been established for aphasic patients, and it is possible to predict a course of recovery of language deficit in the typical aphasic patient by estab- lishing the degree of deficit on initial testing. Since aphasia is not static in the acute phase, the possibility of prediction of future recovery can have important legal impli- cations, as is demonstrated by the following case.

Case illustration The case involved a woman who was aphasic following a stroke two years previously. The woman was the mother of a 5-year-old and a 3-year-old child, both of whom were currently in her custody. The husband was suing for custody of the children on the grounds that the woman could not adequately care for them. The subject had been seen over a two-year period and tested with the Porch Index of Communicative Ability. At the time of her first examination, she was found to be at the 35th percentile of aphasic patients. The 50th percentile has been found to divide dependent communication from independent communication; in other words, patients below the 50th percentile must rely on others to carry the responsibility for communication. One year following her initial examination, the subject was found to have recovered to the 60th percentile and at the time of trial, was expected to recover to the 70th percentile by the use of concerted speech therapy for a three-month period. At the trial a psychiatrist testified to the woman's mental health, her concern for her children, and the emotional impact

Aphasia and the Expert Medical Witness 235

  1. Critchley M: Testamentary capacity in aphasia. Neurology II: 749. 1961
  2. Lewin v Lewin «(TPD] 1949 [4] SALR 241)

26. Usdin GL: The physician and testamentary capacity. Amer J Psych 114:249. 1958

  1. Commonwealth v Morrison. 109 A 878. 800 (1920)

28. Morse HN: The aberrational man-a tour de force of legal psychiatry. J Forensic Sci U:I-32.

  1. Schneiderman v Interstate Lines.Inc. 394 III 569. 69 NE 2nd 293 (1946)
  2. People v Denton. 178 P 2d 524. 78 CA 2d 540
  3. People v Horowitz. 161 P 2d 833. 70 CA 2d 675
  4. Langer v Langer. 194 2d 81.85 CA 2d 806
  5. Lewin v Lewin. op cit n 25
    1. Critchley M: Testamentary capacity in aphasia. In Aphasiology. Critchley M. London. Arnold.
  6. pp 288-
  7. Commonwealth ' Morrison. op cit n 27

36. In Re Comfort. 63 N J. Eq. 377.55 At. U5. 155 (1902)

  1. Usdin op cit
    1. Brookshire RH: An Introduction to Aphasia. BRK. Publishers. Minneapolis. 1975
  2. Porch BE: Porch Index of Communicative Ability. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist. 1967

40. Porch BE: Multidimensional scoring in aphasia testing. J Speech Hearing Res 14:776-792.