





Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Chemical formula detective: determine the empirical formula of hydrate and draw the flow charts.
Typology: Lab Reports
1 / 9
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Bellevue College | CHEM& 161
Different elements can form chemical bonds to create compounds. For example, sodium and chlorine combine to form sodium chloride, NaCl. In the chemical formula NaCl, there is a 1: ratio of sodium ions:chloride ions. However, not all compounds form in a 1:1 ratio of their constituent elements. If they did, John Dalton would have been correct in 1803 when he proposed the chemical formula of water as HO∗. Of course, we now know that the correct chemical formula of water is H 2 O, in which there is a 2:1 ratio of hydrogen atoms to oxygen atoms. Since a mole is Avogadro’s number of atoms, H 2 O is also a 2:1 ratio of moles of hydrogen to moles of oxygen. Thus, the atom ratio is equivalent to the mole ratio (not a mass ratio) in a given chemical formula. As chemistry students you have learned how to predict chemical formulas of ionic compounds based on periodic trends and nomenclature rules, but it hasn’t always been that way. For hundreds of years, the chemical composition of compounds was studied experimentally, and the results generalized into the nomenclature rules used today. These rules allow the accurate prediction of chemical formulas for many ionic compounds without doing any experimentation. For example, the nomenclature rules can be used to correctly predict the formula of magnesium iodide as MgI 2 rather than MgI. The curious student of chemistry will wonder how such a prediction could be verified by experimental means. Your task is to determine the chemical formula of an unknown copper chloride hydrate by experiment. An ionic hydrate is an ionic compound that has water molecules trapped within its crystal lattice (refer to the index/glossary of your textbook for more information). For example, Epsom salt (MgSO 4 ·7H 2 O) is a heptahydrate of magnesium sulfate: within one mole of magnesium sulfate heptahydrate there are seven moles of water. This water can be driven off by heat to form the anhydrous (dehydrated) ionic compound, magnesium sulfate (MgSO 4 ). The chemical formula of your unknown copper chloride hydrate is in the general form of Cu x Cl y · z H 2 O. Your objective is to determine what the actual formula is (what are the integers x , y , and z ?) You will be required to make careful mass measurements and make calculations based on these.
∗ (^) John Dalton (1766-1844) made an assumption that when only one compound was formed from two elements, they did so in the simplest ratio, 1:1. (Water was the only known compound formed from hydrogen and oxygen at the time. Hydrogen peroxide, H 2 O 2 , was not discovered until 1815.) Since the mass ratio of oxygen to hydrogen in water is 8:1, he assigned the mass of hydrogen (the lightest element) to be 1 and , assuming the formula HO, assigned the value 8 to oxygen. The correct formula of water and the relative atomic mass of oxygen as 16 was a puzzle that would not be solved for another fifty years, despite evidence on the combining volumes of hydrogen and oxygen gas in a 2:1 ratio. Avodgadro’s hypothesis would later be used to interpret this evidence correctly.
The formula will be determined by careful mass measurements. Remember, you are starting with Cu x Cl y · z H 2 O. You will decompose this into several components, taking mass measurements along the way. The first step is to gently dehydrate a known mass of your sample. The resulting dehydrated sample will be weighed to determine the amount of water lost (this is the z H 2 O part). The dehydrated copper chloride (now just Cu x Cl y ) will be made into a solution, dissolving the sample into water, making a mixture of copper ions and chloride ions. The copper ions will be reduced∗^ to copper metal, which will be collected, dried, and weighed (now just Cu x ). The remaining task is to determine the mass of chloride∗∗^ in the compound, which can easily be done by mass difference. (The masses of the initial sample, water lost, and copper were determined in the previous steps.) These steps should give you enough data to figure out the chemical formula of the unknown copper chloride hydrate.
∗ (^) Reduction of copper means that copper ions gain electrons to form copper metal. These electrons will be provided by the oxidation (loss of electrons) of an aluminum wire in the solution. ∗∗ (^) The mass of chloride (Cl-^ ion) is being determined. The difference between the mass of chlorine (Cl) and chloride (Cl-^ ion) is negligible. (Why?)
Data Mass of crucible Mass of crucible + CuxCly•zH 2 O Color of CuxCly•zH 2 O crystals Mass of crucible + CuxCly Color of CuxCly solid Initial color of CuxCly solution (before adding Al) Final color of CuxCly solution (after reaction with Al) Mass of watchglass + filter paper Mass of watchglass + filter paper + dried copper Results mass (g) moles CuxCly•zH 2 O CuxCly water released copper chlorine Empirical formula of the copper chloride hydrate: ______________________ Report Sheets Name________________________
What effect would each of the following situations have on the calculation of the number of moles of copper in this experiment? Would the moles of copper increase, or decrease, or stay the same? Give a very brief explanation for each. a) You removed the aluminum wire while the mixture was still blue or contained bubbles. b) You added twice as much aluminum wire as necessary to the copper chloride. (Hint: Is aluminum a limiting reactant or in excess?) c) You couldn’t scrape all of the copper off the aluminum wire. d) The dehydration was not complete because your crystals were still green. You did not reheat to complete the dehydration.
List at least two reasonable sources of error in this experiment. DO NOT list human error ( e.g. spilling chemicals), miscalculations, or significant figures/rounding errors.
Bellevue College | CHEM& 161