Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

Principles of Good Consideration in Contract Law, Exams of Law

The concepts of adequacy and sufficiency of consideration in contract law. It discusses the general rules and exceptions regarding past consideration, existing legal duty, and fresh consideration. The document also covers the impact of practical benefit, termination and replacement of contracts, third-party obligations, and bona fide agreements.

What you will learn

  • What are the exceptions to the existing legal duty rule?
  • How does the concept of practical benefit apply to consideration in contract law?
  • What are the general rules regarding past consideration in contract law?

Typology: Exams

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

millionyoung
millionyoung 🇬🇧

4.5

(25)

242 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Adequacy of consideration
Consideration need not be adequate but must be sufficient (peppercorn principle) [nominal
consideration]
Value is subjective
Courts have no expertise in monetary value judgments
Uncertainty with every case
Other areas of law could cover it instead
Economic freedom which the courts should respect
Sufficiency of consideration
Must be sufficient in the eyes of the law – must have legal value
---
PAST CONSIDERATION
General rule: Past consideration is not good consideration. Consideration which was for a pre-existing
contract [Roscorla v Thomas]
Exception: Services are expected to be paid for. Past consideration is good consideration when it was at
the promisor’s request [Lampleigh v Brathwait] [Ipex software]
EXISTING LEGAL DUTY
General rule: Not good consideration as the promisee is not doing anything more than they were
obliged to do in the first place [Stilk v Myrick]
Part payment/payment of a lesser sum for a larger sum does not constitute as good consideration
[Foakes v Beer]
EXCEPTIONS TO THE EXISTING LEGAL DUTY RULE
Practical benefit
When doing what they were obliged to do would confer a practical benefit to the promisor
Test in [Williams v Roffey Bros] per Glidewell
1. A and B enter into a contract
2. B has doubts as to whether or not A can complete the contract
3. B gives additional payment in return for A to perform their promise
4. B obtains a benefit or obviates a disbenefit
5. B’s promise is not part of economic duress or fraud on behalf of A
6. The benefit to B is valid consideration
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Principles of Good Consideration in Contract Law and more Exams Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Adequacy of consideration

Consideration need not be adequate but must be sufficient (peppercorn principle) [nominal consideration]

 Value is subjective  Courts have no expertise in monetary value judgments  Uncertainty with every case  Other areas of law could cover it instead  Economic freedom which the courts should respect

Sufficiency of consideration

Must be sufficient in the eyes of the law – must have legal value


PAST CONSIDERATION

General rule: Past consideration is not good consideration. Consideration which was for a pre-existing contract [Roscorla v Thomas]

Exception: Services are expected to be paid for. Past consideration is good consideration when it was at the promisor’s request [Lampleigh v Brathwait] [Ipex software]

EXISTING LEGAL DUTY

General rule: Not good consideration as the promisee is not doing anything more than they were obliged to do in the first place [Stilk v Myrick]

Part payment/payment of a lesser sum for a larger sum does not constitute as good consideration [Foakes v Beer]

EXCEPTIONS TO THE EXISTING LEGAL DUTY RULE

Practical benefit

 When doing what they were obliged to do would confer a practical benefit to the promisor

Test in [Williams v Roffey Bros] per Glidewell

  1. A and B enter into a contract
  2. B has doubts as to whether or not A can complete the contract
  3. B gives additional payment in return for A to perform their promise
  4. B obtains a benefit or obviates a disbenefit
  5. B’s promise is not part of economic duress or fraud on behalf of A
  6. The benefit to B is valid consideration

Santow’s modifications in [Musumeci v Winadell]

  1. A and B enter into a contract
  2. B has doubts as to whether or not A can complete the contract
  3. B gives additional payment or other concession in return for A to perform their promise  A’s performance is worth more than any remedy or damages if they were to breach the contractA suffers a detriment as they could have forgone the concession and breached the contract instead
  4. B obtains a benefit or obviates a disbenefit
  5. B’s promise is not part of economic duress or fraud on behalf of A
  6. The benefit to B or detriment to A is valid consideration

Fresh consideration

 Additional consideration that was not given prior [Ponsonby]

Termination and replacement of a contract

 After being released from a contract, consideration for the new contract with the same terms [Ponsonby]

Third party

 New obligations to a third party  Promise to perform a pre-existing obligation for a third party – valid if the promisee gains a benefit from this performance  [Pao on v Lau Yiu Long]

Bona fide

 If both parties genuinely believe that they had no legal obligation to follow through with the contract  [Wigans v Edwards] Edwards believed that they had a right to sue Wigans/not pay him. The consideration was not to sue

[Intention to create legal relations]

Intention – an outward manifestation that suggests that a party intended to enter inter a legal relation

Objective approach: whether or not the party intended to be bound according to a reasonable person [Shahid] – look at the circumstances, status of the parties, their relationship, what they said or did, how weighty the issue is

Presumptions