

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
The concepts of adequacy and sufficiency of consideration in contract law. It discusses the general rules and exceptions regarding past consideration, existing legal duty, and fresh consideration. The document also covers the impact of practical benefit, termination and replacement of contracts, third-party obligations, and bona fide agreements.
What you will learn
Typology: Exams
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Adequacy of consideration
Consideration need not be adequate but must be sufficient (peppercorn principle) [nominal consideration]
Value is subjective Courts have no expertise in monetary value judgments Uncertainty with every case Other areas of law could cover it instead Economic freedom which the courts should respect
Sufficiency of consideration
Must be sufficient in the eyes of the law – must have legal value
PAST CONSIDERATION
General rule: Past consideration is not good consideration. Consideration which was for a pre-existing contract [Roscorla v Thomas]
Exception: Services are expected to be paid for. Past consideration is good consideration when it was at the promisor’s request [Lampleigh v Brathwait] [Ipex software]
EXISTING LEGAL DUTY
General rule: Not good consideration as the promisee is not doing anything more than they were obliged to do in the first place [Stilk v Myrick]
Part payment/payment of a lesser sum for a larger sum does not constitute as good consideration [Foakes v Beer]
EXCEPTIONS TO THE EXISTING LEGAL DUTY RULE
Practical benefit
When doing what they were obliged to do would confer a practical benefit to the promisor
Test in [Williams v Roffey Bros] per Glidewell
Santow’s modifications in [Musumeci v Winadell]
Fresh consideration
Additional consideration that was not given prior [Ponsonby]
Termination and replacement of a contract
After being released from a contract, consideration for the new contract with the same terms [Ponsonby]
Third party
New obligations to a third party Promise to perform a pre-existing obligation for a third party – valid if the promisee gains a benefit from this performance [Pao on v Lau Yiu Long]
Bona fide
If both parties genuinely believe that they had no legal obligation to follow through with the contract [Wigans v Edwards] Edwards believed that they had a right to sue Wigans/not pay him. The consideration was not to sue
Intention – an outward manifestation that suggests that a party intended to enter inter a legal relation
Objective approach: whether or not the party intended to be bound according to a reasonable person [Shahid] – look at the circumstances, status of the parties, their relationship, what they said or did, how weighty the issue is
Presumptions