Partial preview of the text
Download Actual 2024 AQA A-level LAW 7162/2 Paper 2 Merged Question Paper + Mark Scheme Actual 2024 and more Exams Law in PDF only on Docsity!
Actual 2024 AQA A-level LAW 7162/2 Paper 2 Merged Question Paper + Mark Scheme AQA= Please write clearly in block capitals. Centre number Candidate number Surname Forename(s) Candidate signature | declare this is my own work. A-level LAW Paper 2 Tuesday 4 June 2024 Afternoon Time allowed: 2 hours Materials _ * You will need no other materials. fon bariners Use Question Mark Instructions is e Use black ink or black ball-point pen. ¢ Fill in the boxes at the top of this page. 5 « Answer all questions. You must answer the questions in the spaces i provided. Do not write on blank pages. 8 ¢ If you need extra space for your answer(s), use the lined pages at the end of 5 this book. Write the question number against your answer(s). ¢ Do all rough work in this book. Cross through any work you do not want to 10 be marked. 41 * Questions should be answered in continuous prose. Give reasoned answers. Where appropriate, make reference to cases, statutes and Ueuels examples. Information e The marks for questions are shown in brackets. ¢ The maximum mark for this paper is 100. 62201 IB/G/Jun24/G4004/E6 7162/2 1 Do not write outside the Answer all questions in the spaces provided. box Only one answer per question is allowed. For each question completely fill in the circle alongside the appropriate answer. CORRECT METHOD [e| WRONG METHODS |e lola! d| If you want to change your answer you must cross out your original answer as shown. Dx If you wish to return to an answer previously crossed out, ring the answer you now wish to select as shown. Which of the following would not have to be proved when claiming under the rule in Rylands v Fletcher? [1 mark] A That the claimant had a legal interest in the affected land. B That the defendant's actions were reckless. C That the loss suffered was reasonably foreseeable. [a] fo) [a] [ol D That there was an escape of a dangerous thing. Which of the following is not a remedy available to a claimant in the tort of private nuisance? [1 mark] A Afine B An injunction limiting behaviour which is a nuisance C An injunction prohibiting behaviour which is a nuisance [o] Lo] {2} [0] D Damages 02 IB/G/Jun24/7162/2 2 Do not write outside the Explain three of the stages in the House of Commons during the process of creating an bok Act of Parliament. [5 marks] Extra space 5 INI IB/GiJun24/7162/2 4 Do not write outside the 10x Adam was an independent financial advisor, who often met with clients at his home. Bess, his neighbour, disliked Adam. Consequently, every time that Bess saw a client arriving at Adam’s house, she began repair work using loud power tools. The noise of the power tools badly disrupted Adam’s meetings. Adam sued Bess in private nuisance and won his case. Suggest two factors that the court might have taken into account when reaching its decision that Bess’s activities amounted to an unlawful or unreasonable interference under private nuisance. [5 marks] Extra space 5 Turn over for the next question Turn over > 05 IB/G/Jun24/7162/2 5 Do not write outside the box Turn over > INI IB/GiJun24/7162/2 7 Do not write outside the box In Question 09 you are required to provide an extended answer which shows a clear, logical and sustained line of reasoning leading to a valid conclusion. Examine the connection between law and morality. Discuss whether the rules for secondary victims claiming for psychiatric injury in negligence reflect morality. [15 marks] IB/GiJun24/7162/2 8 10 In Question 10 you are required to provide an extended answer which shows a clear, logical and sustained line of reasoning leading to a valid conclusion. Ella owned a biscuit factory. One of the ovens was not working properly. Ella asked Frank, a qualified oven repairer, to check the oven. When Frank tried to check it, he was badly burned by the door of the oven which was unexpectedly hot. The factory's boundary fence ran through some trees. Children often climbed these trees to get over the fence and then run into the factory warehouse to steal biscuits. Ella found this very annoying. She knew that the door to the warehouse, through which the children ran, was loose and in danger of collapse. Ella had told her employees to use a different door. Ella had also put a sign on the door telling people to keep out. One day, Gemma, who was 12 years old, got over the fence and went to the warehouse to look for biscuits. As she was just entering the warehouse, the door collapsed and fell on her. Gemma suffered a broken arm and her mobile phone was badly damaged. Taking into account the law of occupiers’ liability, consider the rights and remedies of Frank against Ella and of Gemma against Ella. [30 marks] IB/G/Jun24/7162/2 10 Do not write outside the box 10 11 Do not write outside the box Turn over > 11 IB/GiJun24/7162/2 11 13 Do not write outside the box Turn over > 13 IB/GiJun24/7162/2 13 14 Do not write outside the box 30 IB/GiJun24/7162/2 14 16 Do not write outside the box 16 IB/GiJun24/7162/2 16 17 Do not write outside the box Extra space Turn over > 17 IB/GiJun24/7162/2 17 19 Do not write outside the box Turn over > IB/GiJun24/7162/2 19 20 Do not write outside the box END OF QUESTIONS 20 IB/G/Jun24/7162/2 20 
