Docsity
Docsity

Prepare for your exams
Prepare for your exams

Study with the several resources on Docsity


Earn points to download
Earn points to download

Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan


Guidelines and tips
Guidelines and tips

7 Questions on American Literature Before 1865 - Assignment | EN 2243, Study notes of English Language

Paper Assignment II Material Type: Notes; Professor: Little; Class: American Lit Before 1865; Subject: English; University: Mississippi State University; Term: Fall 2011;

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 10/20/2011

banana-jeannette
banana-jeannette 🇺🇸

1 document

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Assignment for the Second Paper
A paper (typed, not hand-written) of at least 700 words (exclusive of quotations)
is due on Friday, October 21. Choose one of these topics:
1. Go to cnn.com and find the section called “Political Ticker.” (Usually the list of
items on the home page has an item that begins “Ticker: . . . “’; you can click on
that, but there are other ways to get to “Political Ticker” as well.) Then write an
essay addressing one of these questions: A. On the basis of the
Autobiography, what would Benjamin Franklin be likely to say about one or more
of the items on the “Political Ticker”? B. On the basis of the two letters by
Thomas Jefferson that are on our reading list, what would Jefferson be likely to
say about one or more of the items on the “Political Ticker”?
2. On the basis of either the Autobiography or the selections by Paine in your
anthology, what might Benjamin Franklin or Thomas Paine say about Bradford’s
Of Plymouth Plantation, Winthrop’s Journal, or Sewall’s Diary (choose one)?
How do you know?
3. Discuss to what extent and in what way or ways Washington Irving’s “Rip Van
Winkle” dramatizes concepts found in Emerson’s Nature. Make this discussion
lead logically to discussion of at least one substantive difference. (By
“substantive,” I’m referring to perspective, to ideology, etc.––not to genre. Don’t
simply tell me that one piece is fiction and the other’s an essay.)
4. On the basis of Emerson’s “Self-Reliance,” what do you think that Emerson
might have to say about Franklin’s project of arriving at moral perfection
(including Franklin’s introductory account of his religious history), pp. 412-419 of
your anthology)?
5. Think about Emerson’s Nature and William Cullen Bryant’s “Thanatopsis.”
Identify something (or some things) that they have in common, and identify some
way in which their viewpoints diverge.
6. If Thomas Paine were to comment on the selection from Chapter VII of The
Deerslayer in your anthology, what might he be likely to say? (Your source for
Paine’s ideas will be the selections from The Age of Reason in your anthology.)
7. Ralph Waldo Emerson has just attended his first professional (or college)
football game. On the basis of Nature or “Self-Reliance” (or both), what would he
be likely to say on the subject?
+ + + + + + +
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download 7 Questions on American Literature Before 1865 - Assignment | EN 2243 and more Study notes English Language in PDF only on Docsity!

Assignment for the Second Paper

A paper (typed, not hand-written) of at least 700 words (exclusive of quotations) is due on Friday, October 21. Choose one of these topics:

  1. Go to cnn.com and find the section called “Political Ticker.” (Usually the list of items on the home page has an item that begins “Ticker:... “’; you can click on that, but there are other ways to get to “Political Ticker” as well.) Then write an essay addressing one of these questions: A. On the basis of the Autobiography , what would Benjamin Franklin be likely to say about one or more of the items on the “Political Ticker”? B. On the basis of the two letters by Thomas Jefferson that are on our reading list, what would Jefferson be likely to say about one or more of the items on the “Political Ticker”?
  2. On the basis of either the Autobiography or the selections by Paine in your anthology, what might Benjamin Franklin or Thomas Paine say about Bradford’s Of Plymouth Plantation , Winthrop’s Journal , or Sewall’s Diary (choose one)? How do you know?
  3. Discuss to what extent and in what way or ways Washington Irving’s “Rip Van Winkle” dramatizes concepts found in Emerson’s Nature. Make this discussion lead logically to discussion of at least one substantive difference. (By “substantive,” I’m referring to perspective, to ideology, etc.––not to genre. Don’t simply tell me that one piece is fiction and the other’s an essay.)
  4. On the basis of Emerson’s “Self-Reliance,” what do you think that Emerson might have to say about Franklin’s project of arriving at moral perfection (including Franklin’s introductory account of his religious history), pp. 412-419 of your anthology)?
  5. Think about Emerson’s Nature and William Cullen Bryant’s “Thanatopsis.” Identify something (or some things) that they have in common, and identify some way in which their viewpoints diverge.
  6. If Thomas Paine were to comment on the selection from Chapter VII of The Deerslayer in your anthology, what might he be likely to say? (Your source for Paine’s ideas will be the selections from The Age of Reason in your anthology.)
  7. Ralph Waldo Emerson has just attended his first professional (or college) football game. On the basis of Nature or “Self-Reliance” (or both), what would he be likely to say on the subject?

When I say “exclusive of quotations,” I don’t mean that you should not quote. I mean that whatever you quote does not count as part of the 700-word minimum. DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES CONSULT SECONDARY SOURCES FOR THE WRITING OF THIS PAPER, i. e., do not consult anybody’s commentary about any author, about any specific work by any author, or about the “historical period” in which an author lived. I will assess the quality of your paper on the basis of the depth and breadth of understanding it shows of the texts you choose to work with. I will look for intellectual ambition, insight, and subtlety of thought, as well as solidity of documentation (i. e., your finding clear textual bases for your observations). Naturally, clarity, efficiency, and simple correctness of writing will be necessary to the overall effectiveness of your presentation. Write in your own voice; do not pretend to be one of the authors. Your basic approach is “Author A would say X about Y because Z” (though I certainly do not expect all of your sentences to be structured that way). Give your paper a title, and make the title informative and, if possible, interesting. Do not waste time and energy with such expressions as “I feel,” “In my opinion,” or “The author of the present discussion is of the belief that.” Think of yourself as a person of knowledge and insight, writing to a reasonably intelligent audience. Your job is to teach. I will be glad to discuss this paper with you outside of class.