




Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Community
Ask the community for help and clear up your study doubts
Discover the best universities in your country according to Docsity users
Free resources
Download our free guides on studying techniques, anxiety management strategies, and thesis advice from Docsity tutors
Conservative vector fields in three dimensions, their properties, and provides examples. It explains the concept of conservative vector fields, the fundamental theorem of line integrals, and the necessary conditions for a vector field to be conservative. The document also includes an example of finding the line integral of a conservative vector field along a curve.
What you will learn
Typology: Study notes
1 / 8
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
Math 241 - Calculus III
Spring 2012, section CL
§ 16.5. Conservative vector fields in R
3
In these notes, we discuss conservative vector fields in 3 dimensions, and highlight the similar-
ities and differences with the 2-dimensional case. Compare with the notes on § 16.3.
Let us recall the basics on conservative vector fields.
Definition 1.1. Let
n be a vector field with domain D ⊆ R
n
. The vector field
F is said to be conservative if it is the gradient of a function. In other words, there is a
differentiable function f : D → R satisfying
F = ∇f. Such a function f is called a potential
function for
Example 1.2.
F (x, y, z) = (y
2
z
3
, 2 xyz
3
, 3 xy
2
z
2
) is conservative, since it is
F = ∇f for the
function f (x, y, z) = xy
2 z
3 .
Example 1.3.
F (x, y, z) = (3x
2
z, z
2
, x
3
+2yz) is conservative, since it is
F = ∇f for the function
f (x, y, z) = x
3 z + yz
2 .
The fundamental theorem of line integrals makes integrating conservative vector fields along
curves very easy. The following proposition explains in more detail what is nice about conser-
vative vector fields.
Proposition 1.4. The following properties of a vector field
F are equivalent.
F is conservative.
C
F · d~r is path-independent, meaning that it only depends on the endpoints of the curve
C
F · d~r = 0 around any closed curve C.
Example 1.5. Find the line integral
C
F · d~r of the vector field
F (x, y, z) = (3x
2 z, z
2 , x
3
along the curve C parametrized by
~r(t) =
ln t
ln 2
, t
3
2 , t cos(πt)
, 1 ≤ t ≤ 4.
Solution. We know that
F is conservative, with potential function f (x, y) = x
3 z + yz
2
. The
endpoints of C are
~r(1) = (0, 1 , −1)
~r(4) = (
ln 4
ln 2
The fundamental theorem of line integrals yields
C
F · d~r =
C
∇f · d~r
= f (~r(4)) − f (~r(1))
= f (2, 8 , 0) − f (0, 1 , −1)
To know if a vector field
F is conservative, the first thing to check is the following criterion.
Proposition 2.1. Let D ⊆ R
3
be an open subset and let
3
be a continuously
differentiable vector field with domain D. If
F is conservative, then it satisfies curl
Explicitly,
1
2
3
) satisfies the three conditions
1
2
2
1
1
3
3
1
2
3
3
2
everywhere on D.
Proof. Assume there is a differentiable function f : D → R satisfying
F = ∇f on D. Because
f is twice continuously differentiable (meaning it has all second partial derivatives and they are
all continuous), Clairaut’s theorem applies, meaning the mixed partial derivatives agree. Since
the first partial derivatives of f are (fx, fy, fz ) = (∂ 1 f, ∂ 2 f, ∂ 3 f ) = (F 1 , F 2 , F 3 ), we obtain
1
2
f = ∂ 2
1
f
1
2
2
1
1
3
f = ∂ 3
1
f
1
3
3
1
2
3
f = ∂ 3
2
f
2
3
3
2
These conditions are equivalent to curl
0, because of the formula:
curl
i
j
k
1
2
3
i(∂ 2
3
3
2
j(∂ 1
3
3
1
k(∂ 1
2
2
1
Solution. First we compute
curl
i
j
k
∂x ∂y ∂z
3 x
2 y
2 z + 5y
3 2 x
3 yz + 15xy
2 − 7 z x
3 y
2 − 7 y + 4z
3
i
2 x
3
y − 7 − (2x
3
y − 7)
j(3x
2
y
2
− 3 x
2
y
2
) +
k
6 x
2
yz + 15y
2
− (6x
2
yz + 15y
2
)
Moreover,
F is defined (and smooth) on all of R
3 , hence it is conservative. Let us find a
potential function f (x, y, z) for
F. We want
fx = F 1 = 3x
2
y
2
z + 5y
3
f y
2
= 2x
3
yz + 15xy
2
− 7 z
f z
3
= x
3 y
2 − 7 y + 4z
3 .
Using the first equation, we obtain
f =
1
dx
3 x
2
y
2
z + 5y
3
dx
= x
3
y
2
z + 5xy
3
whose derivative with respect to y is
2 x
3
yz + 15xy
2
(y, z).
Using the second equation, we equate this with F 2 :
2 x
3
yz + 15xy
2
(y, z) = 2x
3
yz + 15xy
2
− 7 z
⇒ gy(y, z) = − 7 z
⇒ g(y, z) =
− 7 z dy
= − 7 yz + h(z).
Plugging this back into the expression for f , we obtain
f = x
3
y
2
z + 5xy
3
− 7 yz + h(z)
whose derivative with respect to z is
x
3
y
2
− 7 y + h
′
(z).
Using the third equation, we equate this with F 3 :
x
3
y
2
− 7 y + h
′
(z) = x
3
y
2
− 7 y + 4z
3
⇒ h
′
(z) = 4z
3
⇒ h(z) =
4 z
3
dz
= z
4
Choosing the constant c = 0, we obtain h(z) = z
4 and thus the potential function
f (x, y, z) = x
3
y
2
z + 5xy
3
− 7 yz + z
4
.
Asking for
F to be defined (and continuously differentiable) on all of R
3 is somewhat restrictive.
That condition can be loosened.
Definition 4.1. A subset D of R
n is called simply connected if it is path-connected moreover,
and every loop in D can be contracted to a point.
Example 4.2. R
3 itself is simply connected.
Example 4.3. The first octant {(x, y, z) ∈ R
3
| x, y, z > 0 } is simply connected.
Example 4.4. The open ball {(x, y, z) ∈ R
3 | x
2
2
2 < 1 } is simply connected.
Example 4.5. The closed ball {(x, y, z) ∈ R
3 | x
2
2
2 ≤ 1 } is simply connected.
Example 4.6. The (surface of the) sphere {(x, y, z) ∈ R
3 | x
2
2
2 = 1} is simply connected.
See the nice picture here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simply-connected#Informal_discussion.
Example 4.7. Interesting fact: The punctured space
3 \ {(0, 0 , 0)} = {(x, y, z) ∈ R
3 | (x, y, z) 6 = (0, 0 , 0)}
is simply connected. This might seem confusing, since the punctured plane R
2 \ {(0, 0)} is
not simply connected. That is because in 3 dimensions, there is enough room to move a loop
around the puncture and then contract it to a point. Therefore the informal idea that “simply
connected means no holes” is not really accurate.
Example 4.8. The “thick sphere” {(x, y, z) ∈ R
3 | 1 < x
2
2
2 < 4 } between radii 1 and 2
is simply connected.
Example 4.9. R
3
with a line removed, for example
3
\ {z-axis} = {(x, y, z) ∈ R
3
| x
2
2
6 = 0}
is not simply connected. Indeed, any curve in D going once around the z-axis cannot be
contracted to a point.
Example 4.10. The “thick cylinder” {(x, y, z) ∈ R
3
| 1 ≤ x
2
2
≤ 4 } between radii 1 and 2 is
not simply connected, for the same reason.
Example 4.11. The solid torus {((3 + u cos α) cos θ, (3 + u cos α) sin θ, u sin α) | α, θ ∈ R, 0 ≤
u ≤ 1 } is not simply connected. A curve going once around the “hole” in the middle (e.g. u, α
constant, θ goes from 0 to 2π) cannot be contracted to a point.
Example 4.12. The (surface of the) torus {((3 + cos α) cos θ, (3 + cos α) sin θ, sin α) | α, θ ∈ R} is
not simply connected. A curve going once around the “hole” in the middle (e.g. α constant, θ
goes from 0 to 2π) cannot be contracted to a point. Also, a curve going once around the “tire”
(e.g. θ constant, α goes from 0 to 2π) cannot be contracted to a point.
With that notion, we obtain the following improvement on proposition 3.1.
Let us find a potential f for
F. We want
fx = F 1 =
x
ρ
2
f y
2
y
ρ
2
f z
3
z
ρ
2
Using the first equation, we obtain
f =
F 1 dx
x
x
2
2
2
dx Take u = x
2
2
2
, du = 2xdx
u
du
ln u + g(y, z)
ln(x
2
2
2
) + g(y, z)
whose derivative with respect to y is
y
x
2
2
2
(y, z).
Using the second equation, we equate this with F 2
y
x
2
2
2
(y, z) =
y
x
2
2
2
⇒ g y
(y, z) = 0
⇒ g(y, z) = 0 + h(z).
Plugging this back into the expression for f , we obtain
f =
ln(x
2
2
2
) + h(z)
whose derivative with respect to z is
z
x
2
2
2
′
(z).
Using the third equation, we equate this with F 3
z
x
2
2
2
′
(z) =
z
x
2
2
2
⇒ h
′
(z) = 0
⇒ h(z) = c.
Choosing the constant c = 0, we obtain h(z) = 0 and thus the potential function
f (x, y, z) =
ln(x
2
2
2
).
Suppose we are given a vector field
F in 3 dimensions and we want to know if
F is conservative.
F. If curl
0, then
F is certainly not conservative.
0 and the domain of
F is all of R
3 (or more generally: a simply-connected
region), then
F is certainly conservative.
0 and the domain of
F is not simply connected, then one cannot conclude:
could be conservative or not. One must work harder to answer the question.